Hello!
After the changes committed today the testsuite fails. The first failing
test is aclocali.test:
$ make check TESTS=aclocali.test VERBOSE=1
make check-TESTS
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/automake.v0/tests'
=== Running test ./aclocali.test
automake: configure.in: required fil
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hari> I don't know if this a GCC bug. I'm assuming it's not -- it
> Hari> makes sense to clean up if the compile fails; the compiler
> Hari> doesn't provide rollback for -o, why should it provide rollback
> Hari> for -MF.
>
> Dependency files are differen
> "Hari" == Raja R Harinath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hari> GCC 3.0 doesn't still exactly implement exactly what 'depcomp'
Hari> wants.
Bummer.
Hari> I don't know if this a GCC bug. I'm assuming it's not -- it
Hari> makes sense to clean up if the compile fails; the compiler
Hari> doesn't
Hi,
Raja R Harinath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> GCC 3.0 doesn't still exactly implement exactly what 'depcomp' wants.
>
> The problem is that if the compile fails, the file specified to -MF is
> deleted too. With 'gcc -MF $depfile', $depfile is deleted. But,
> $depfile is eventually included
Hi,
GCC 3.0 doesn't still exactly implement exactly what 'depcomp' wants.
The problem is that if the compile fails, the file specified to -MF is
deleted too. With 'gcc -MF $depfile', $depfile is deleted. But,
$depfile is eventually included by the Makefile -- so subsequent
'make' invocations w
> "Cliff" == Cliff Tsai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Cliff> I write a simple program and using autoconf,automake,but
Cliff> have following automake problem.
Cliff> my Makefile.am is
Cliff> bin_PROGRAMS = test
Cliff> test_SOURCES = main.c help.c help.h
Cliff> but encou