>>>>> "Hari" == Raja R Harinath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hari> GCC 3.0 doesn't still exactly implement exactly what 'depcomp'
Hari> wants.
Bummer.
Hari> I don't know if this a GCC bug. I'm assuming it's not -- it
Hari> makes sense to clean up if the compile fails; the compiler
Hari> doesn't provide rollback for -o, why should it provide rollback
Hari> for -MF.
Dependency files are different from .o files though.
It would make sense to write a temporary dependency file and then `mv'
it on success (or `rm' on failure).
Hari> * depcomp (gcc3): Protect against the compiler deleting
Hari> the dependency output file.
I checked this in.
Tom
