New Vitality Newsletter
Green Tea Is It Nature's Answer?
IMPORTANT HEALTH BULLETIN
GREEN TEA
Youve probably read about it in the papers, heard about it on CNN and radio, and word
of mouth can be pretty powerful as well, but do you really know what Green Tea is all
about and what it can mean
New Vitality Newsletter
Green Tea Is It Nature's Answer?
IMPORTANT HEALTH BULLETIN
GREEN TEA
Youve probably read about it in the papers, heard about it on CNN and radio, and word
of mouth can be pretty powerful as well, but do you really know what Green Tea is all
about and what it can mean
Thanks everyone. Right now I'm just using the as a workaround until the
automake problem is fixed. I'm only worried about GNU make on Cywin at
the moment.
Dave
Lars J. Aas wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 06:37:38PM +0100, Akim Demaille wrote:
> : Hm, it looks like it's removed only in the to
I'm not sure if this is the correct list to mention Makefile.in, but
I will anyway...
In the process of trying to build WGET v1.6 on OS/2, it was discovered
that the GNU source compiled fine if:-
exeext = @exeext@
was changed to:-
exeext = @EXEEXT@
in src/Makefile.in
Is the variable ex
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 06:37:38PM +0100, Akim Demaille wrote:
: Hm, it looks like it's removed only in the top dir. It also seems
: you've been saved by the colon :) But apparently, expect problems
: with Sun? Dunno.
If I recall correctly, IRIX make supports $VPATH in the sense that
it will u
> "Dave" == Dave Brolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dave> No problems so far. What kind of problems are you expecting?
It likes removing VPATH definitions from Makefiles. Many people
complain about that, but I confess I never really tried to understand
what the problem was. I just know th
> "Dave" == Dave Brolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dave> FWIW, I'm working around this for now using VPATH:
Dave>VPATH=$(srcdir):../host
Dave> and specifying h1.cpp without a path in in
Dave> libfred_la_SOURCES. Seems to work OK. Is this supported?
I'm afraid not. I believe some versi
> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alexandre> I think I wouldn't reject a patch that would look at
Alexandre> MAKEFLAGS and turn libtool quiet if it finds a -s in
Alexandre> there...
Automake could do this too. But it will just make the Makefiles even
more complica
Akim Demaille wrote:
>> "Dave" == Dave Brolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Dave> FWIW, I'm working around this for now using VPATH:
>
> Dave>VPATH=$(srcdir):../host
>
> Dave> and specifying h1.cpp without a path in in
> Dave> libfred_la_SOURCES. Seems to work OK. Is this sup
> "Dave" == Dave Brolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dave> FWIW, I'm working around this for now using VPATH:
Dave>VPATH=$(srcdir):../host
Dave> and specifying h1.cpp without a path in in
Dave> libfred_la_SOURCES. Seems to work OK. Is this supported?
Expect problems with Autoconf...
Tom Tromey wrote:
>> "Dave" == Dave Brolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Dave> To work around the problem I have to change the generated dependency to:
>
> Dave>h1.lo: ../host/h1.cpp
> Dave>$(LTCXXCOMPILE) -c -o $@ $<
>
> Dave> Is this a make bug, or should automake
11 matches
Mail list logo
