On Mar 9, 2000, "H . J . Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 11:12:42PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Mar 9, 2000, "H . J . Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >> all: stmp-run-ld
>> >> stmp-run-ld: ld-new
>> >> @ ./ld-new > $@ 2>&1
>>
>> > Tried. It doesn't work w
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 11:12:42PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Mar 9, 2000, "H . J . Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> all: stmp-run-ld
> >> stmp-run-ld: ld-new
> >> @ ./ld-new > $@ 2>&1
>
> > Tried. It doesn't work with parallel build due to the recursive make.
>
> Use `all-am', th
On Mar 9, 2000, "H . J . Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> all: stmp-run-ld
>> stmp-run-ld: ld-new
>> @ ./ld-new > $@ 2>&1
> Tried. It doesn't work with parallel build due to the recursive make.
Use `all-am', then.
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Enjoy Guaraná
Cyg
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 10:41:22PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Mar 9, 2000, "H . J . Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > As the result, ./ld/ld-new, which is a shell script, uses too many
> > arguments when it was executed the first time.
>
> What I don't understand is why it doesn't us
On Mar 9, 2000, "H . J . Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As the result, ./ld/ld-new, which is a shell script, uses too many
> arguments when it was executed the first time.
What I don't understand is why it doesn't use too many arguments
afterwards... Do you know?
> The idea is to create .li
Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|>Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 11:50:59 -0800
|>From: "H . J . Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|>
|>I know this patch doesn't look very clean. But I don't know automake
|>well enough to make it better. Here is the problem I am trying to fix.
|>I
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 11:58:15AM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 11:50:59 -0800
>From: "H . J . Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>I know this patch doesn't look very clean. But I don't know automake
>well enough to make it better. Here is the problem I am trying t
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 11:50:59 -0800
From: "H . J . Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I know this patch doesn't look very clean. But I don't know automake
well enough to make it better. Here is the problem I am trying to fix.
I got:
# /work/ia64/bin/cygnus/2303/gcc/xgcc
-B/usr/ia64-
I know this patch doesn't look very clean. But I don't know automake
well enough to make it better. Here is the problem I am trying to fix.
I got:
# /work/ia64/bin/cygnus/2303/gcc/xgcc
-B/usr/ia64-cygnus-linux/ia64-cygnus-linux/bin/
-B/usr/ia64-cygnus-linux/ia64-cygnus-linux/lib/ -B/work/ia
Hi,
When compiling with IRIX's CC (depmode=sgi), the libtool=yes option will
cause a lot of warning messages on the .deps/*.TPlo files (cannot open).
With libtool=no there are no problems (obviously, the other case in this
test works for CC):
sgi)
if test "$libtool" = yes; then
"$@" "-Wc
10 matches
Mail list logo
