On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 11:12:42PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Mar 9, 2000, "H . J . Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> all: stmp-run-ld > >> stmp-run-ld: ld-new > >> @ ./ld-new > $@ 2>&1 > > > Tried. It doesn't work with parallel build due to the recursive make. > > Use `all-am', then. > It works a little better. But it still doesn't work right since ld-new$(EXEEXT) is made through the recursive make. ld-new$(EXEEXT) has to be run at the same make level where ld-new$(EXEEXT) is built. -- H.J. Lu ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- [PATCH]: ld/Makefile.am H . J . Lu
- Re: [PATCH]: ld/Makefile.am Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [PATCH]: ld/Makefile.am H . J . Lu
- Re: [PATCH]: ld/Makefile.am Andreas Schwab
- Re: [PATCH]: ld/Makefile.am Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [PATCH]: ld/Makefile.am Andreas Schwab
- Re: [PATCH]: ld/Makefile.am Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [PATCH]: ld/Makefile.am Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [PATCH]: ld/Makefile.am H . J . Lu
- Re: [PATCH]: ld/Makefile.am Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [PATCH]: ld/Makefile.am H . J . Lu
- Re: [PATCH]: ld/Makefile.am Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [PATCH]: ld/Makefile.am Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [PATCH]: ld/Makefile.am H . J . Lu
- Re: [PATCH]: ld/Makefile.am Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [PATCH]: ld/Makefile.am H . J . Lu