On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Paul Eggert wrote:
Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Should dependency-name be a package or a desired feature, which the
suggested package(s) support?
A feature, obviously. But I don't see the need for dependency-name in
the first place. I think it won't wo
hi
iam getting the following when i do autoconf
iam usin autoconf 2.59
if the error is due to version incompatability
then how do i find out which version to use.
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/experi/mutt-1.5.8$ autoconf
configure.in:1: error: possi
Hello,
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 11:24:45AM -0500, John W. Eaton wrote:
> Same as `AC_LINK_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([[INCLUDES]],
> [[FUNCTION-BODY]])], [ACTION-IF-TRUE], [ACTION-IF-FALSE])' (*note
> Running the Compiler::).
you are quoting here the node with title "Obsolete Macros".
On 7-Mar-2005, Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 11:24:45AM -0500, John W. Eaton wrote:
| > Same as `AC_LINK_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([[INCLUDES]],
| > [[FUNCTION-BODY]])], [ACTION-IF-TRUE], [ACTION-IF-FALSE])' (*note
| > Running the Compiler::).
|
|
Hello,
one idea just came to my mind:
for each AC_SUBSTed variable, Automake adds a line like
ZZZ_LIBS = @ZZZ_LIBS@
to each Makefile.in.
We should somehow take care of this, so that the produced Makefiles
are not incorrect.
I'm not sure how the solution should look like, though.
Perhaps w
Hello,
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 07:09:49PM -0300, Hema K wrote:
> iam getting the following when i do autoconf
> iam usin autoconf 2.59
> if the error is due to version incompatability
> then how do i find out which version to use.
>
> ---
> [EMAIL PROTE
Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Paul, can I commit the attached small doc patch?
Yes, please. Thanks.
___
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
