Title: Montaje de Stands para Ferias, Exposiciones y actos similares
Montaje de Stands para Ferias, Exposiciones y actos similares
Mensaje enviado con motivo de :
Stands
de diseño
Feria
entera
Title: Message
Your email address was obtained from a subscribed
service, Reference # 4060-6106If you wish to unsubscribe from this list,
please Click Here This
email was intended to be received in HTML format. If you did not receive this
email in the proper form, Click Here
Hi there,
I have a small query regarding the pthread support on Interix. I hope I can
get some answers here.
I am compiling a code that uses posix threads using pthread library
extensively. When I am trying to port this code for Interix 3.0, I am facing
a lot of problems, a basic of them is that
| > From: Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > Date: 22 Jul 2002 17:33:13 +0200
| >
| > Paul> AIX and Interix use _ALL_SOURCE, Solaris uses __EXTENSIONS__,
| > Paul> GNU uses _GNU_SOURCE, HP/UX uses _HPUX_SOURCE, and Minix uses
| > Paul> _MINIX, _POSIX_SOURCE and _POSIX_1_SOURCE. Currently the
Title: ¸ðÀÚÀÌÅ©°¡ µå¸®´Â ¹Ý°¡¿î ¼Ò½Ä
ÈÞ°¡Ã¶ µ¿¾È ȨÆäÀÌÁö¸¦ ´ÜÀåÇÏ¸é ¾î¶³±î¿ä?
Title: DVDÇ÷¹À̾î Ư°¡À̺¥Æ®
<ŸÀÌƲ¼±ÅÃ>
±îÀÌÀ¯
ÇdzëÅ°¿À
The Kid
¸ðÂ÷¸£Æ®
¸ÞÀÌÁö
¿¤¸ðÀÇ ´ë¸ðÇè
¾ç¹èÃß À
Dear autoconf ,
Want
To Harvest A Lot Of Email Addresses In A Very Short Time?
Easy Email
Searcher is
a powerful Email software that
harvests general Email lists from mail servers Easy Email Searcher can get 100,000
Ditch Interix and use Cygwin, perhaps?
Microsoft's support for Posix has always sucked,
and will always suck.
- Dan
-Original Message-
From: Santosh Kadam
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 7/23/2002 5:36 AM
Subject: Pthread Support For Interix
Hi there,
I have a small query regarding the pt
Neither interix or cygwin support pthreads to my knowledge. I personally
would use interix in preference to cygwin as it has fewer documented
security holes...
There used to be a project which was implementing pthreads as a layer on
top of NT threads, but I can't remember where it was. Checking
> From: "Mark D. Roth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 13:08:51 -0500
> We might be able to compensate for this by trying
> /bin/pwd, but only using the result if it exists successfully.
I'd rather try $PWD, then pwd, and fall back on /bin/pwd only if the
other two methods don't wor
On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 11:47:36AM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
> > "mcmahill" == mcmahill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> mcmahill> I'm ending up with a file called '=build/configure.lineno'
> mcmahill> after 'make distcheck' which of course causes the distcheck
> mcmahill> to fail. This is
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 04:16:52PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 11:47:36AM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
> > > "mcmahill" == mcmahill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > mcmahill> I'm ending up with a file called '=build/configure.lineno'
> > mcmahill> after 'make dis
It still a bug. Patrick: Do you know if it is autoconf or automake that is
creating this file?
> -Original Message-
> From: Patrick Welche [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 8:23 AM
> To: Patrick Welche
> Cc: Akim Demaille; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [
On Tuesday 23 July 2002 04:14 pm, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> By the way, is it intentional that the autogen binary is called
> i386-redhat-linux-autogen? I think it's a bad idea. I'm currently trying
> to use Autogen to generate one Linux driver from another (spectrum_cs.c
> from orinoco_cs.c in cas
On Tue Jul 23 13:31 2002 -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> I'd rather try $PWD, then pwd, and fall back on /bin/pwd only if the
> other two methods don't work. That way, the names will be nicer.
That won't solve the problem, specifically because $PWD and pwd give
the "nice" path names. The problem is
I just compiled and ran a pthreads program on Cygwin,
so perhaps they have progressed since last time you checked.
Which documented security holes are you referring to?
Interix costs money, so it's a bit moot; I use Cygwin because
I don't have to fill out a purchase order and have my boss
approv
Hi
Could someone tell me how to remove optims in my autoconf/automake project?
I use gcc 2.96 on Linux with autoconf 2.53 and automake 1.5
Thanks
-jec
> I just prefer bash sometimes. Gets me that nice tab
> completion feature missing in win2k.
Of course you should use cygwin :-) but you don't need to get it just
for tab completion. Set in your registry
\HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Command Processor\CompletionChar
to 9, and tab will
18 matches
Mail list logo
