I get the following error msgs when using autoheader while trying to
build mktemp:-
autoheader.: checking completeness of the template
autoheader.: No template for symbol `HAVE_PROGNAME'
autoheader.: No template for symbol `MKDTEMP'
autoheader.: No template for symbol `MKSTEMP'
autoheader.: No
On Wed, 2001-11-07 at 10:55, John Poltorak wrote:
>
> I get the following error msgs when using autoheader while trying to
> build mktemp:-
>
> autoheader.: checking completeness of the template
> autoheader.: No template for symbol `HAVE_PROGNAME'
> autoheader.: No template for symbol `MKDTEMP
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 11:33:32AM +0100, Tim Van Holder wrote:
> On Wed, 2001-11-07 at 10:55, John Poltorak wrote:
> >
> > I get the following error msgs when using autoheader while trying to
> > build mktemp:-
> >
> > autoheader.: checking completeness of the template
> > autoheader.: No temp
On Wed, 2001-11-07 at 11:54, John Poltorak wrote:
>
> So this line:-
>
> test "$mktemp_cv_progname" = "yes" && AC_DEFINE(HAVE_PROGNAME)
>
> should be changed to something like:- ?
>
> test "$mktemp_cv_progname" = "yes" && AC_DEFINE(HAVE_PROGNAME, 1, [foo])
>
Exactly (though I'd prefer an if/
I found this excellent website yesterday:-
http://www.amath.washington.edu/~lf/tutorials/autoconf/
Unfortunately it is out of date, and a number of links are broken.
Can anyone suggest an updated alternative?
--
John
Here is a macro to test for stdbool.h; since it is a standard header
I think it belongs in autoconf rather than in some macro archive.
The patch is against 2.52f
Paolo
diff -r -U3 old/doc/autoconf.texi new/doc/autoconf.texi
--- old/doc/autoconf.texi Fri Nov 2 17:10:56 2001
+++ new/doc
For some reason I keep getting this error msg when running Make after
configure:-
*** Warning: File `config.h' has modification time in the future
config.h has a timestamp one hour in front of the current time.
Any suggestions about what could be causing this?
I suspect it is related to $TZ
Es schrieb John Poltorak:
>
> For some reason I keep getting this error msg when running Make after
> configure:-
>
> *** Warning: File `config.h' has modification time in the future
>
> config.h has a timestamp one hour in front of the current time.
>
> Any suggestions about what could be cau
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 03:32:55PM +0100, Guido Draheim wrote:
> Es schrieb John Poltorak:
> >
> > For some reason I keep getting this error msg when running Make after
> > configure:-
> >
> > *** Warning: File `config.h' has modification time in the future
> >
> > config.h has a timestamp one
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 12:32:55PM +, John Poltorak wrote:
> I found this excellent website yesterday:-
>
> http://www.amath.washington.edu/~lf/tutorials/autoconf/
>
> Unfortunately it is out of date, and a number of links are broken.
>
> Can anyone suggest an updated alternative?
Last lin
I'm trying to build the GNU Sharutils using an external GETTEXT library,
but the current (very old) archive doesn't seem to have an option for
specifying this. Since the the Sharutils seem to be abandoned, or at least
I can't find a maintainer, I wonder if anyone here could suggest any
chang
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 07:21:24PM +, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 12:32:55PM +, John Poltorak wrote:
> > I found this excellent website yesterday:-
> >
> > http://www.amath.washington.edu/~lf/tutorials/autoconf/
> >
> > Unfortunately it is out of date, and a number o
I very much like the idea of having a macro like this, but I worry
about the fact that it creates a file stdbool.h. Suppose that file is
left around from a previous build: won't that possibly screw up the
next build if it doesn't want stdbool.h? Surely the output file
should be removed before th
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 07:49:28PM +, John Poltorak wrote:
>
> Yes, it does look useful, but it would be better if it included Autoconf
> v2.50.
> I would definitely buy the book if it did.
I find your words quite rude!
You don't seem to realize the amount of effort that was put in this,
y
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07/11/2001 12:49]:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 07:49:28PM +, John Poltorak wrote:
> >
> > Yes, it does look useful, but it would be better if it included Autoconf
> > v2.50.
> > I would definitely buy the book if it did.
>
> Let me emphasize it again.
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 09:36:06PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 07:49:28PM +, John Poltorak wrote:
> >
> > Yes, it does look useful, but it would be better if it included Autoconf
> > v2.50.
> > I would definitely buy the book if it did.
>
> I find your words qu
***
USNETLOAN.COM
http://www.usnetloan.com/index1.html
1-888-696-9600
***
Call USNETLOAN NOW at 1-888-696-9600 to take advantage of this incredible opportunity
to DRASTICALLY lower your monthly mortgage!
We will LOCK
It says,
> I'd like to say one small thing before the actual
> content starts: Please contribute!
Attached are two files that produce six feature
tests. The first file is "misc.def" which defines
the six tests. The second file is "config.tpl" which
defines how to create an autoconf feature te
> > > Mktemp is available here:-
> > > ftp://ftp.cs.colorado.edu/pub/mktemp/mktemp-1.3.1.tar.gz
> >
> > No it's not:
> > --11:32:26--
> > ftp://ftp.cs.colorado.edu:21/pub/mktemp/mktemp-1.3.1.tar.gz
> >=> `mktemp-1.3.1.tar.gz'
> > Connecting to ftp.cs.colorado.edu:21...
> > Connectio
Paul Eggert wrote:
>
> I very much like the idea of having a macro like this, but I worry
> about the fact that it creates a file stdbool.h. Suppose that file is
> left around from a previous build: won't that possibly screw up the
> next build if it doesn't want stdbool.h? Surely the output fi
20 matches
Mail list logo
