WOW THIS REALLY WORKS!!!
Dear Friend & Future Millionaire:
AS SEEN ON NATIONAL TV:
Making over half a million dollars every 4-5 months from your home for
an investment of only $25 U.S. Dollars expense one time.
THANKS TO THE COMPUTER AGE AND THE INTERNET!!
==
Title: Untitled Document
2001ÄêÖйú¹ú¼ÊÅ©Òµ¿Æ¼¼Äê»á¹ú¼ÊÂÌɫʳƷÓëÈËÀཡ¿µ²©ÀÀ»á¼°Ñ§ÊõÌÖÂÛ»áÕ¹ÆÚ£º
¡¡2001Äê9ÔÂ4ÈÕ-7Èյص㣺
¡¡´óÁ¬ÐǺ£»áÕ¹ÖÐÐÄÖ÷°ì£º
¡¡ÖлªÈËÃñ¹²ºÍ¹úÅ©Òµ²¿¡¡Öйú¿Æѧ¼¼Êõлᡡ´óÁ¬ÊÐÈËÃñÕþ¸®³Ð°ì£º
¡¡ÖйúÂÌɫʳƷ·¢Õ¹ÖÐÐÄ¡¡Öйúũѧ»á¡¡ÖйúÂÌɫʳƷлᡡ´óÁ¬ÊÐÅ©Òµ¾Ö¡¡´óÁ¬
> "Denis" == Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Denis> Hi Akim,
Hi!
Denis> is there a (good ;)) reason why Autoconf 2.50 do not respect
Denis> its own advice, e.g. by not renaming configure.in to
Denis> configure.ac, or still using AC_OUTPUT(FILES...)?
The fact that no Automake rele
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 10:35:29AM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
> > "Denis" == Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Denis> Hi Akim,
>
> Hi!
>
> Denis> is there a (good ;)) reason why Autoconf 2.50 do not respect
> Denis> its own advice, e.g. by not renaming configure.in to
> Denis>
Remember a good while back, I kept whinging about F77_WRAPPERS on my NetBSD
box? Well, I just tried what's in CVS and all tests pass! (1.5W/i386)
Thanks a lot,
Patrick
> From: Ed L Cashin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 04 Jul 2001 18:57:13 -0400
>
> > Ed> I've found that saying "test -r" is not reliable on Solaris.
> > Huh?
>
> Sorry, I think I was confusing "test -e" with "test -r". I'll let you
> know if I learn more.
Yes, "test -e" does not work with Solar
> From: "Andrej Borsenkow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 21:44:58 +0400
>
> > > From: "Andrej Borsenkow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:58:35 +0400
> > >
> > > It checks only for specific option for IRIX and _FILE_OFFSET_BITS and
> > > _LARGE_FILES macros. That
On Monday 16 July 2001 9:35 am, Akim Demaille wrote:
> > "Denis" == Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Denis> Hi Akim,
>
> Hi!
>
> Denis> is there a (good ;)) reason why Autoconf 2.50 do not respect
> Denis> its own advice, e.g. by not renaming configure.in to
> Denis> configure.ac
> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alexandre> It would probably be appropriate to take this opportunity
Alexandre> to rename AM_DEPENDENCIES to _AM_DEPENDENCIES, since now it
Alexandre> must no longer be called by the user (otherwise it might
Alexandre> run before AC
