Re: HPUX: running `ranlib --version' creates ./--version [Re: fileutils/autoconf: --version left behind

2001-04-24 Thread Akim Demaille
> | Looking at config.log I find: > | > | configure:2667: checking for ranlib > | configure:2682: found /usr/ccs/bin/ranlib > | configure:2684: /usr/ccs/bin/ranlib --version &2 > | + eval $ac_dir/$ac_word --version &2 > | + /usr/ccs/bin/ranlib --version > | + 0< /dev/null 1>& 2 > |

Re: AC_PROG_CC now required?

2001-04-24 Thread Harlan Stenn
Ah! This is the problem. It looks for CPP, which defaults to /lib/cpp; however cpp is in /usr/bin/cpp on my system, and that path is not located. If we search for CC, the CPP test works. Now I'm insanely tired and am really going to fall asleep before it gets any brighter outside. H -- > >

Re: Autoconf 2.49e

2001-04-24 Thread Lars J. Aas
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 03:27:39AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: : On Apr 23, 2001, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : Alexandre> Please tag the tree as autoconf-2_49e immediately. Then, : Alexandre> we can always branch off the tag if needed. : : > Are you referring to a plain : : >

Re: security vs. configure

2001-04-24 Thread Lars J. Aas
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 09:15:20PM -0400, Eric Siegerman wrote: : On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 10:14:16PM +1000, Michael Still wrote: : > How many people use make dist though? My thinking was based on the fact : > that the configure script is the bit that people seem to be concerned : > about the most,

Re: Autoconf 2.49e

2001-04-24 Thread Eric Siegerman
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 03:27:39AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Apr 23, 2001, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Are you referring to a plain > > > cvs tag autoconf-2_49e > > Yep. But it's too late now, since other changes have been checked in > after the snapshot was ta

[Help:] autoconf installation

2001-04-24 Thread J. Liu
Hello, I am new to autoconf. would please give me soem detail instruction on how to install the package and m4 package ? thanks.

¹«·á·Î µå¸³´Ï´Ù.(50ºÐ¿¡°Ô¸¸)

2001-04-24 Thread E4 µµ¿ì¹ÌÀÔ´Ï´Ù .
Title: *»çÀ̹ö°­ÁÂ(»ùÇÃÆ÷ÇÔ)¸¦µéÀ¸½Ã·Á¸éGVA¸¦¼³Ä¡ÇϼžßÇÕ´Ï´Ù.          

Re: AC_PROG_CC now required?

2001-04-24 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Harlan" == Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Harlan> Latest CVS autoconf. I have several autoconf packages that do Harlan> not do any compiling, so I don't bother to call AC_PROG_CC . Harlan> However, the generated "configure" script seems to want to Harlan> find the C preprocesso

Re: AC_PROG_CC now required?

2001-04-24 Thread Harlan Stenn
Found it (mostly). The following configure.in will fail: AC_INIT(sidai, 1.0, [EMAIL PROTECTED]) AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(sidai, 1.0) AC_PROG_MAKE_SET AC_CANONICAL_BUILD AC_PATH_X AC_OUTPUT It works fine without the AC_PATH_X. I need to fall asleep soon. H

Re: AC_PROG_CC now required?

2001-04-24 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Harlan" == Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Harlan> Found it (mostly). The following configure.in will fail: Harlan> AC_INIT(sidai, 1.0, [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Harlan> AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(sidai, 1.0) Harlan> AC_PROG_MAKE_SET Harlan> AC_CANONICAL_BUILD Harlan> AC_PATH_X Harlan>