Re: AC_PROG_CC now required?

[Akim Demaille]

>>>>> "Harlan" == Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Harlan> Latest CVS autoconf.  I have several autoconf packages that do
Harlan> not do any compiling, so I don't bother to call AC_PROG_CC .

Harlan> However, the generated "configure" script seems to want to
Harlan> find the C preprocessor, and this fails with:

Hm, this is not meant.  I don't observe this with, e.g., Autoconf
itself, we need more details.