Re: installation instructions on OpenBSD and FreeBSD

On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 01:16:10AM -0500, Greg A. Woods wrote: > > Strictly speaking such systems as the *BSD ports/pkgsrc should not be > running the configure but should instead have pre-canned configurations > ready to use. > > Configure is just too damn smart for any package building system,

Re: win32 compiler test V3a

| Which is the error I eas seeing before.. Without the sources we can't do anything for you but asking a stupid question: what version of Autoconf are you using?

Re: Depending on system install scripts (was Re: [BUGS] COBOL) (fwd)

> "Peter" == Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Peter> The problem with AC_PROG_INSTALL is that it doesn't actually Peter> test whether the found program works. I agree it is quite badly written and does exactly what we tell people not to do. Send patches :)

Re: win32 compiler test V3a

I cat'd the sources so you could see... and they are in the V4 macro I've mailed out (just un dnl the two AC_REQUIRE lines and run aclocal && autoconf) CVS autoconf. $ autoconf --version autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.49d Written by David J. MacKenzie. Copyright 1992, 1993, 1994, 1996, 1999, 2000 Fre

Re: win32 compiler test V3a

> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Robert> I cat'd the sources so you could see... (One coffee later). Well, I reread your previous message, and indeed _now_ there are sources in there. How did you do that? :) | $ cat ./acinclude.m4 | AC_DEFUN([AC_PROG_CXX_WIN32], [

Re: win32 compiler test V3a

- Original Message - From: "Akim Demaille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 8:40 PM Subject: Re: win32 compiler test V3a > > "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

V4a win32 macro

This has the AC_REQUIRE autoconf problem fixed (thanks Akim). However if the user doesn't put AC_PROG_CC in anyway, the output looks like: configure: creating cache /dev/null checking for a BSD compatible install... /bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for ma

Re: win32 compiler test V3a

> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Robert> That works. I take it that putting the [ around the Robert> AC_PROG_CXX_WIN32 is ok? No, it is mandatory. Actually that was the meaning of my `quote' comments in your first draft. Read the CVS Autoconf doc about quotation.

Re: V4a win32 macro

> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Robert> However if the user doesn't put AC_PROG_CC in anyway, Robert> the output looks like: /tmp % cat configure.ac nostromo 11:14 m4_include([acinclude.m4]) AC_INIT AC_API_WIN32 /tmp % ace

Re: V4a win32 macro

Must be an oddity with my install then. Rob - Original Message - From: "Akim Demaille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 9:15 PM Subject: Re: V4a win32 macro > > "Robert" == Robert

Re: V4a win32 macro

> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Robert> Must be an oddity with my install then. Rob What are your sources?

Suggestion: Allow cleanup code in AC_LANG_POP

Hello, I'd like to suggest the following small patch (rationale below): Index: aclang.m4 === RCS file: /cvs/autoconf/aclang.m4,v retrieving revision 1.124 diff -u -r1.124 aclang.m4 --- aclang.m4 2001/03/13 12:28:19 1.124 +++

where can I find "acmkdir" utility?

Well, the subject says it all. I'm trying to learn to use the autotools, but the mysterious "acmkdir" utility is nowhere to be found. I've downloaded autoconf, automake, and libtool. Does anyone know where I can find acmkdir? Thanks, Daniel -- Daniel Herrington, KC0IFV http://members.home.