> "Pavel" == Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Pavel> Hello! What version of Automake are we using to rebuild
Pavel> Makefile.in's?
Pavel> It must be a modified version since the stock Automake
Pavel> hardcodes "gtar" and has a bug in the "distdir" target.
I use ``stock'' Automake 1
Hi People,
We are heading slowly towards the 2.50 release. There are still many
small details to fix in Autoconf, in particular the test suite which
Pavel is quickly improving. I think it is reasonable to aim at 2.49b,
a widely advertised beta, for the next couple of weeks.
Before 2.50, it wo
Akim Demaille writes:
> > "Russ" == Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Russ> Could the really annoying "feature" of mangling the subjects of
> Russ> incoming messages be turned off?
>
> It should be ok by now.
I liked it... :-(
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] h
Hello!
Could anybody please look at "man pdksh" and check whether "set -o posix"
in pdksh will make any difference for Autoconf.
The testsuite passes under pdksh without "set -o posix" just fine, but if
Autoconf relies on some constructs that behave differently it would be
nice to add a test.
T
Hello!
How portable is "mv -f" used in autoheader.sh? If it is, I believe we
should switch to using it everywhere to avoid any unwanted interactivity.
Otherwise, it should be replaced with "rm -f" and "cp".
Related question - how portable is "mv" across mount points, i.e. between
$TMPDIR and the
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 02:56:07PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Akim Demaille writes:
>
> > > "Russ" == Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Russ> Could the really annoying "feature" of mangling the subjects of
> > Russ> incoming messages be turned off?
> >
> > It should be
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 08:17:18AM -0700, Ossama Othman wrote:
: On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 02:56:07PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
: > Akim Demaille writes:
: >
: > > > "Russ" == Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > >
: > > Russ> Could the really annoying "feature" of mangling the su
| On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 08:17:18AM -0700, Ossama Othman wrote:
| : On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 02:56:07PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
| : > Akim Demaille writes:
| : >
| : > > > "Russ" == Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| : > >
| : > > Russ> Could the really annoying "feature" of
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 05:45:24PM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
> | : > I liked it... :-(
> | :
> | : As did I. :-(
> |
> | I didn't. :-/
>
> Stop growing this series of replies ;)
Right! :-)
Out of curiosity, are you guys receiving duplicate e-mails from the
list? I seem to be getting two
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 08:54:59AM -0700, Ossama Othman wrote:
: Out of curiosity, are you guys receiving duplicate e-mails from the
: list? I seem to be getting two copies of each e-mail sent from all of
: the GNU lists I'm subscribed to.
On the Guile user list, I've in the last couple of days
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 02:56:07PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Akim Demaille writes:
> >
> > > > "Russ" == Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > Russ> Could the really annoying "feature" of mangling the subjects of
> > > Russ> incoming messages be turned off?
> > >
>
2000-09-21 Lars J. Aas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* autoconf.sh: Report full macro name for missing macros.
Index: autoconf.sh
===
RCS file: /cvs/autoconf/autoconf.sh,v
retrieving revision 1.89
diff -u -r1.89 autoconf.sh
--- auto
--- Ossama Othman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Out of curiosity, are you guys receiving duplicate e-mails from the
> list? I seem to be getting two copies of each e-mail sent from all of
> the GNU lists I'm subscribed to.
>
Not all. Only some. Akim's posts are being repeated.
Cheers,
===
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 06:50:43 -0400 (EDT)
From: Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
How portable is "mv -f" used in autoheader.sh? If it is, I believe we
should switch to using it everywhere to avoid any unwanted interactivity.
I believe that mv -f is fully portable. I think the only
Hello!
I tried to run autoupdate on the following configure.in
AC_INIT
AC_LINK_FILES(a, b)
AC_OUTPUT
and it printed:
/tmp/au9096/input.m4:45: /usr/bin/m4: Non-numeric argument to built-in `0@0@h'
/tmp/au9096/input.m4:45: /usr/bin/m4: Cannot open [/tmp/au9096/disable.m4]: No such
file or direc
Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 06:50:43 -0400 (EDT)
>From: Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>How portable is "mv -f" used in autoheader.sh? If it is, I believe we
>should switch to using it everywhere to avoid any unwanted
>interactivity.
I'd like to have Autoconf generate makefile
dependencies for compilers other than gcc,
but I'm not familiar with the autoconf source
enough to find where it is done. Would someone
be kind enough to point me in the right direction?
--
Robert Boehne Software Engineer
Ricardo Software
Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's a pity that the Autoconf documentation gives hint about broken
> functions only for functions that have their own AC_FUNC_FOO, likewise
> for headers. If you know a function which should be AC_CHECK_FUNC'd or
> AC_REPLACE_FUNC'd, please, submit so
From: Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 21 Sep 2000 18:10:18 -0700
> I believe that mv -f is fully portable. I think the only portable
> options to mv are -f and -i.
I know that cp -f definitely *isn't* portable. I forget where it
misbehaved, but it was a bug report agai
[ On Thursday, September 21, 2000 at 09:38:19 (-0700), Ben wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Meta list issue: subject prefixes
>
> I third that. It made it really easy to scan my inbox and see what went where.
> ;-(
There are many many better ways to sort one's mail than to depend on
some broken mailing
[ On , September 21, 2000 at 18:37:09 (-0700), Russ Allbery wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Call for help on improving the documentation
>
> * SysV systems (e.g. Solaris) often don't have hstrerror.
hstrerror is part of libresolv and any system which has a libresolv too
old to have hstrerror will likely
21 matches
Mail list logo
