Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 06:50:43 -0400 (EDT)
   From: Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

   How portable is "mv -f" used in autoheader.sh? If it is, I believe we
   should switch to using it everywhere to avoid any unwanted interactivity.

I believe that mv -f is fully portable.  I think the only portable
options to mv are -f and -i.

   Related question - how portable is "mv" across mount points, i.e. between
   $TMPDIR and the current directory? Will "mv -f" help?

I do not think that mv across mount points is portable.  The -f option
will not help.

Ian
_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

Reply via email to