Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not very robust

2000-06-14 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Alexandre> Because some compilers just print a warning message and Alexandre> proceed. GCC on HP/UX without GNU as is a good example. >> Aaah! OK, thanks. But what can drive someone to make such a >> decision? Alexandre> Maybe

Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not very robust

2000-06-14 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Alexandre> On Jun 13, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'm tempted to say he is right. Why don't we just check for the >> exit status? Alexandre> Because some compilers just print a warning message and Alexandre>

Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not very robust

2000-06-14 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Jun 14, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Alexandre> On Jun 13, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I'm tempted to say he is right. Why don't we just check for the >>> exit status? Alexandre> Becaus

Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not very robust

2000-06-14 Thread Akim Demaille
| Maybe you could just check for stderr output, instead of checking both | stdout and stderr? But I don't know if compilers reliably send warning | messages of this sort to stderr, as they should. (Sigh...) Hm, I like the idea, but don't know if it is good or not :) Anyway, it doesn't cost to

Re: Getting a "cannot run" message from ./configure

2000-06-14 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Ossama" == Ossama Othman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ossama> Hi Akim, On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 09:48:02AM +0200, Akim Ossama> Demaille wrote: >> > "Mo" == Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Mo> I am stumped. Is something wrong with the Mo> AC_REQUIRE([AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR_DEFAULT])

[Fwd: Re: VAX Ultrix bootstrap failure with gcc-2.96]

2000-06-14 Thread Bruce Korb
Original Message Subject: Re: VAX Ultrix bootstrap failure with gcc-2.96 Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 08:07:51 -0700 From: Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Santa Cruz Operations To: John David Anglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PRO

Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not very robust

2000-06-14 Thread Mo DeJong
On 14 Jun 2000, Akim Demaille wrote: > > "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Alexandre> Because some compilers just print a warning message and > Alexandre> proceed. GCC on HP/UX without GNU as is a good example. ... > So, I think we should base our conclusion up

Re: DJGPP testsuite results

2000-06-14 Thread Mark E.
> I don't get it at all. Why would you have such problems, and I > don't??? > > Can you send one of these input.m4 files? Thanks! > The first error messages from debug-98.sh are this: ../autoupdate -d -v -m $top_srcdir -

Start Your Own E-Commerce Store with NO COSTS

2000-06-14 Thread cory_alan
Name Your SHOPPING MALL Yes, your own e-commerce site Choose the name, design, stores, and even the products you feature! ALL at Absolutely no cost -- FREE! No credit card needed to open your mall, just an address to mall your sale checks & commissions to: HURRY before the name you want fo