Re: bad config.h on Solaris 8

2001-07-16 Thread Paul Eggert
> From: Ed L Cashin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 04 Jul 2001 18:57:13 -0400 > > > Ed> I've found that saying "test -r" is not reliable on Solaris. > > Huh? > > Sorry, I think I was confusing "test -e" with "test -r". I'll let you > know if I learn more. Yes, "test -e" does not work with Solar

Re: bad config.h on Solaris 8

2001-07-04 Thread Ed L Cashin
Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > "Ed" == Ed L Cashin writes: > > Ed> I've found that saying "test -r" is not reliable on Solaris. > > Huh? Sorry, I think I was confusing "test -e" with "test -r". I'll let you know if I learn more. -- --Ed Cashin PGP pub

Re: bad config.h on Solaris 8

2001-07-03 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Ed" == Ed L Cashin writes: Ed> I've found that saying "test -r" is not reliable on Solaris. Huh? Could you demonstrate clearly the problem? I mean, a small script with surprising results. Or some documentation. Ed> I only get consistent results if I use the full path. Could you

Re: bad config.h on Solaris 8

2001-07-02 Thread Ed L Cashin
Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Recap of problem: configure script doesn't generate config.h on the > | basis of results from tests. Removing config.cache and rerunning > | configure yeilds a correct config.h. > | > | > What version of Autoconf? > | > | 2.13 and 2.50. > > Hm...

Re: bad config.h on Solaris 8

2001-06-23 Thread Akim Demaille
| Recap of problem: configure script doesn't generate config.h on the | basis of results from tests. Removing config.cache and rerunning | configure yeilds a correct config.h. | | > What version of Autoconf? | | 2.13 and 2.50. Hm... Does autoconf 2.50 complain when you run it? A common mist

Re: bad config.h on Solaris 8

2001-06-19 Thread Ed L Cashin
The problem is back (probably it was a fluke that it went away), so I'm sending specifics. This is a Solaris 8 machine on SPARC in the sourceforge compile farm. Recap of problem: configure script doesn't generate config.h on the basis of results from tests. Removing config.cache and rerunning c

Re: bad config.h on Solaris 8

2001-06-19 Thread Ed L Cashin
Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi! > > Sorry, but if you want help, you need to help us. We have little > time. Sure. :) (I know the feeling.) > What version of Autoconf? I used both 2.13 and 2.50 with the same results for both versions. ... > Could you send the two versions o

Re: bad config.h on Solaris 8

2001-06-19 Thread Akim Demaille
Hi! Sorry, but if you want help, you need to help us. We have little time. What version of Autoconf? Could you attach config.h.in? Could you send the two versions of config.h?

bad config.h on Solaris 8

2001-06-18 Thread Ed L Cashin
Hi. I haven't been able to find mention of this problem elsewhere: on Solaris 8, my autoconf-generated configure script fails to relate test results to the generated config.h file. However, removing config.cache and re-running configure *does* generate a correct config.h file. This pattern is