On 2023-05-24 12:14, Luke Mewburn wrote:
11: autoconf: forbidden tokens, basic FAILED (tools.at:485)
41: autom4te preselections FAILED (tools.at:1545)
Are these known issues on RHEL 8 / CentOS / Fedora style systems?
Is it worth sending more details to
Hi,
While preparing some bug fixes for autoconf, I ran the testsuite
from a clean git clone (branch master as at commit 8e7281d7)
on CentOS Stream 8, and there were two failures:
## GNU Autoconf 2.72c.24-8e728 test suite. ##
## --- ##
> From: Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 07 Jun 2002 11:43:41 +0200
>
> I think it is high time to disable include and sinclude from
> Autoconf. That's too dangerous. Paul, do we agree? m4_include and
> m4_sinclude are available since 2.50, and people are not supposed to
> use include
| Alexandre Oliva wrote:
| >
| > On Jan 26, 2001, Matt Schalit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| >
| > > I'm concerned that the CVS version will have more bugs in it.
| > > If it's not stable, then I thought it's not stable.
| >
| > Maybe using yesterday's candidate release, just taken out of the C
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> On Jan 26, 2001, Matt Schalit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm concerned that the CVS version will have more bugs in it.
> > If it's not stable, then I thought it's not stable.
>
> Maybe using yesterday's candidate release, just taken out of the CVS
> tree, would
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> On Jan 26, 2001, Matt Schalit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm concerned that the CVS version will have more bugs in it.
> > If it's not stable, then I thought it's not stable.
>
> Maybe using yesterday's candidate release, just taken out of the CVS
> tree, would
On Jan 26, 2001, Matt Schalit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm concerned that the CVS version will have more bugs in it.
> If it's not stable, then I thought it's not stable.
Maybe using yesterday's candidate release, just taken out of the CVS
tree, would make you feel better? We'd rather hash
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> On Jan 21, 2001, Matthew Schalit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Is this because I have no CXX or F77 at this point?
>
> Quite likely. Would you give CVS autoconf a spin and see how it goes?
> It should probably handle the lack of these programs more gracefully.
>
On Jan 21, 2001, Matthew Schalit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this because I have no CXX or F77 at this point?
Quite likely. Would you give CVS autoconf a spin and see how it goes?
It should probably handle the lack of these programs more gracefully.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', se
Hi Folks,
I'm not sure where to post for help. Perhaps this
is the right place. I'm asking for some help checking
the FAIL lines from my gmake check output.
I am trying to compile and test the latest autoconf-2.13,
on UnixWare 7.1.1 using cc.
I am running
UnixWare 7.1.1
gmake 3.79.1
> "Pavel" == Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Pavel> I don't know what "trap" you are talking about,
In the case we AC_MSG_ERROR.
Pavel> but the testsuite fails after this patch because "conftest" is
Pavel> not removed e.g. by AC_PROG_CC
Arg, I forgot to adjust my patch, I had not
Hello, Akim!
You just applied:
2000-11-30 Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* acspecific.m4 (_AC_EXEEXT, _AC_OBJEXT): Make the two macros more
alike: a loop over a sorted list of possible files.
Don't cleanup on errors, the trap will do it.
Cleanup when there a
12 matches
Mail list logo
