Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> On Jan 26, 2001, Matt Schalit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm concerned that the CVS version will have more bugs in it.
> > If it's not stable, then I thought it's not stable.
>
> Maybe using yesterday's candidate release, just taken out of the CVS
> tree, would make you feel better? We'd rather hash out any bugs
> before the release :-) That's why I suggested you might want to try
> the CVS tree...
>
Ok, I'll try it and try to post an intelligent followup that contains
what I did, what issues I had, and any relevant outputs.
Thanks,
Matt
