| As a workaround (so Python users don't require a CVS or hacked version of
| autoconf), you could strip '-g' from CFLAGS on BeOS (as it seems to be that
| flag that produces the .xSYM file) in configure.in.
|
| Index: lib/autoconf/lang.m4
| ==
> I'm the creator of Python.
Like anyone here wouldn't recognize your name. You're quite famous in
certain circles, you know.
> I'm new to this list. We use autoconf (happily, I might add) and I've
> run into a snag. Please look at this Python bug report on SourceForge:
>
> http://sf.net/tra
> "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ralf> BTW: This example triggers further problems in automake's and
Ralf> autoconf's interaction wrt. handling ASM-code. AFAIS,
Ralf> CVS/automake currently generates bogus code for ASM; autoconf
Ralf> probably might need an AC_PROG_AS-ma
> "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ralf> Until now this package's configure.in has been using AC_EXEEXT
Ralf> alone (w/o AC_PROG_CC), now I seem to need adding AC_PROG_CC,
Ralf> but ..
Undesired side effect. It seems so weird to need EXEEXT but no
compiler...
Ralf> A
> > > Until now this package's configure.in has been using AC_EXEEXT alone
> > > (w/o AC_PROG_CC), now I seem to need adding AC_PROG_CC, but ..
> > > .. Adding AC_CANONICAL_HOST would give sense, but this also
> > > apparently isn't sufficient.
> >
> > This does seem like the right thing to do th
Tim Van Holder wrote:
>
> On 16 May 2001 00:22:43 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
> > Until now this package's configure.in has been using AC_EXEEXT alone
> > (w/o AC_PROG_CC), now I seem to need adding AC_PROG_CC, but ..
> > .. Adding AC_CANONICAL_HOST would give sense, but this also
> > apparen
On 16 May 2001 00:22:43 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Until now this package's configure.in has been using AC_EXEEXT alone
> (w/o AC_PROG_CC), now I seem to need adding AC_PROG_CC, but ..
> .. Adding AC_CANONICAL_HOST would give sense, but this also
> apparently isn't sufficient.
This does seem
Akim Demaille wrote:
>
> > "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Ralf> Hi,
>
> Hi!
>
> Ralf> With autoconf-cvs AC_EXEEXT doesn't do anything anymore. I.e.
> Ralf> configure-scripts which are using AC_EXEEXT, but do not
> Ralf> explicitly call AC_PROG_CC, silently break w
> "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ralf> Hi,
Hi!
Ralf> With autoconf-cvs AC_EXEEXT doesn't do anything anymore. I.e.
Ralf> configure-scripts which are using AC_EXEEXT, but do not
Ralf> explicitly call AC_PROG_CC, silently break with autoconf-cvs
Ralf> (@EXEEXT@ will not