Re: AC_EXEEXT macro problem

2001-08-09 Thread Akim Demaille
| As a workaround (so Python users don't require a CVS or hacked version of | autoconf), you could strip '-g' from CFLAGS on BeOS (as it seems to be that | flag that produces the .xSYM file) in configure.in. | | Index: lib/autoconf/lang.m4 | ==

Re: AC_EXEEXT macro problem

2001-08-08 Thread Tim Van Holder
> I'm the creator of Python. Like anyone here wouldn't recognize your name. You're quite famous in certain circles, you know. > I'm new to this list. We use autoconf (happily, I might add) and I've > run into a snag. Please look at this Python bug report on SourceForge: > > http://sf.net/tra

Re: AC_EXEEXT

2001-05-19 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ralf> BTW: This example triggers further problems in automake's and Ralf> autoconf's interaction wrt. handling ASM-code. AFAIS, Ralf> CVS/automake currently generates bogus code for ASM; autoconf Ralf> probably might need an AC_PROG_AS-ma

Re: AC_EXEEXT

2001-05-19 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ralf> Until now this package's configure.in has been using AC_EXEEXT Ralf> alone (w/o AC_PROG_CC), now I seem to need adding AC_PROG_CC, Ralf> but .. Undesired side effect. It seems so weird to need EXEEXT but no compiler... Ralf> A

RE: AC_EXEEXT

2001-05-17 Thread Tim Van Holder
> > > Until now this package's configure.in has been using AC_EXEEXT alone > > > (w/o AC_PROG_CC), now I seem to need adding AC_PROG_CC, but .. > > > .. Adding AC_CANONICAL_HOST would give sense, but this also > > > apparently isn't sufficient. > > > > This does seem like the right thing to do th

Re: AC_EXEEXT

2001-05-17 Thread Ralf Corsepius
Tim Van Holder wrote: > > On 16 May 2001 00:22:43 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > Until now this package's configure.in has been using AC_EXEEXT alone > > (w/o AC_PROG_CC), now I seem to need adding AC_PROG_CC, but .. > > .. Adding AC_CANONICAL_HOST would give sense, but this also > > apparen

Re: AC_EXEEXT

2001-05-15 Thread Tim Van Holder
On 16 May 2001 00:22:43 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Until now this package's configure.in has been using AC_EXEEXT alone > (w/o AC_PROG_CC), now I seem to need adding AC_PROG_CC, but .. > .. Adding AC_CANONICAL_HOST would give sense, but this also > apparently isn't sufficient. This does seem

Re: AC_EXEEXT

2001-05-15 Thread Ralf Corsepius
Akim Demaille wrote: > > > "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Ralf> Hi, > > Hi! > > Ralf> With autoconf-cvs AC_EXEEXT doesn't do anything anymore. I.e. > Ralf> configure-scripts which are using AC_EXEEXT, but do not > Ralf> explicitly call AC_PROG_CC, silently break w

Re: AC_EXEEXT

2001-05-15 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ralf> Hi, Hi! Ralf> With autoconf-cvs AC_EXEEXT doesn't do anything anymore. I.e. Ralf> configure-scripts which are using AC_EXEEXT, but do not Ralf> explicitly call AC_PROG_CC, silently break with autoconf-cvs Ralf> (@EXEEXT@ will not