>>>>> "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ralf> Hi,
Hi!
Ralf> With autoconf-cvs AC_EXEEXT doesn't do anything anymore. I.e.
Ralf> configure-scripts which are using AC_EXEEXT, but do not
Ralf> explicitly call AC_PROG_CC, silently break with autoconf-cvs
Ralf> (@EXEEXT@ will not be substituted).
Ralf> Can't autoconf at least warn about using AC_EXEEXT w/o
Ralf> AC_PROG_CC?
Hm, does EXEEXT make sense when there are no binaries? I mean,
shouldn't it be defined to nothing. And in fact, how come it is used
if there are no binaries?
