> "Ian" == Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Akim> I would like to understand why there are three `rm' while one
Akim> seems way enough. It seems like the author took a special care
Akim> to remove the conftest files before the user can touch them.
Ian> I don't know. This is a g
From: Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 03 Mar 2000 09:41:51 +0100
I would like to understand why there are three `rm' while one seems
way enough. It seems like the author took a special care to remove
the conftest files before the user can touch them.
I don't know. This i
>
> On Mar 3, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I would like to understand why there are three `rm' while one seems
> > way enough. It seems like the author took a special care to remove
> > the conftest files before the user can touch them.
>
> Probably because user code c
On Mar 3, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to understand why there are three `rm' while one seems
> way enough. It seems like the author took a special care to remove
> the conftest files before the user can touch them.
Probably because user code could contain othe
> "Earnie" == Earnie Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Earnie> I'll investigate further. Most of my experience with autoconf
Earnie> is with Cygwin and MinGW and I don't remember seeing anything
Earnie> that detailed.
Something I'd like to call a flaw with config.log is that it is
cleared ea
I'll investigate further. Most of my experience with autoconf is with Cygwin
and MinGW and I don't remember seeing anything that detailed.
Earnie.
--- Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Earnie" == Earnie Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Earnie> config.log doesn't contain the
> "Earnie" == Earnie Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Earnie> config.log doesn't contain the compilers failure if I remember
Earnie> correctly. Only where in configure that it is.
Hm, what do you mean?
/tmp % cat configure.in
AC_INIT
AC_PROG_CC
AC_TRY_COMPILE([int main () { syntax error}])
--- Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-8<-
> If you want to check the various failures after configure was run, you
> should browse config.log, that's its point.
>
config.log doesn't contain the compilers failure if I remember correctly. Only
where in configure that it is.
=
---
> "Earnie" == Earnie Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Earnie> My vote would be to remove conftest at the front of the
Earnie> script, if that's even necessary, and leave it for the user to
Earnie> look at when script exists. Then let `make clean' handle the
Earnie> removal of conftest.
We m
--- Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Let's raise this question again, I'm really puzzled, and I'd like to
> be explained what is going on.
>
-8<-
> I would like to understand why there are three `rm' while one seems
> way enough. It seems like the author took a special care
Hi!
Let's raise this question again, I'm really puzzled, and I'd like to
be explained what is going on.
Below is the current AC_TRY_CPP, but other AC_TRY have more or less
the same code. In particular, pay attention to the various `rm
conftest'.
| # AC_TRY_CPP(INCLUDES, [ACTION-IF-TRUE], [AC
11 matches
Mail list logo
