Re: Handling of extra macros

2005-12-02 Thread Patrick Welche
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 04:26:40PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Patrick Welche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Isn't the long term goal "aclocal must be subsumed into autoconf"? What > > is preventing this from happening sooner rather than later? > > I never really understood why one would want

Re: Handling of extra macros

2005-12-01 Thread Russ Allbery
Patrick Welche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Isn't the long term goal "aclocal must be subsumed into autoconf"? What > is preventing this from happening sooner rather than later? I never really understood why one would want to use aclocal rather than m4_include with separate .m4 files unless one

Re: Handling of extra macros

2005-12-01 Thread Ross Boylan
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 23:55 +, Patrick Welche wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 09:38:31PM +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > > >>> "RB" == Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > RB> 5. The autoconf manual has no index entry for aclocal. There is one > > for > > RB> aclocal.m4, a

Re: Handling of extra macros

2005-12-01 Thread Patrick Welche
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 09:38:31PM +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > >>> "RB" == Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > RB> 5. The autoconf manual has no index entry for aclocal. There is one for > RB> aclocal.m4, and the text refers to aclocal. Is aclocal deprecated? > > aclocal is p

Re: Handling of extra macros

2005-12-01 Thread Keith Marshall
On Thursday 01 December 2005 9:10 pm, Ross Boylan wrote: > On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 21:38 +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > > >>> "RB" == Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > RB> 5. The autoconf manual has no index entry for aclocal. There is one > > for RB> aclocal.m4, and the text re

Re: Handling of extra macros

2005-12-01 Thread Ross Boylan
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 21:38 +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > >>> "RB" == Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > RB> 5. The autoconf manual has no index entry for aclocal. There is one for > RB> aclocal.m4, and the text refers to aclocal. Is aclocal deprecated? > > aclocal is part of

Re: Handling of extra macros

2005-12-01 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "RB" == Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: RB> 5. The autoconf manual has no index entry for aclocal. There is one for RB> aclocal.m4, and the text refers to aclocal. Is aclocal deprecated? aclocal is part of Automake, not autoconf. The Automake manual documents aclocal and explains

Handling of extra macros

2005-12-01 Thread Ross Boylan
I've seen conflicting advice about how to handle extra macros, whether developed locally or from the archive. What's the best way to get them into configure? I think this reduces to the question of how to make aclocal aware of them. 1. AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR doesn't work, according to prior posts o