On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 23:55 +0000, Patrick Welche wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 09:38:31PM +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > > >>> "RB" == Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > RB> 5. The autoconf manual has no index entry for aclocal. There is one > > for > > RB> aclocal.m4, and the text refers to aclocal. Is aclocal deprecated? > > > > aclocal is part of Automake, not autoconf. The Automake manual > > documents aclocal and explains how to handle local macros properly. > > Isn't the long term goal "aclocal must be subsumed into autoconf"? What is > preventing this from happening sooner rather than later? > Some of the posts I reviewed suggested that the long-term goal was "aclocal must die."
_______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
