On Mar 1, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Eric" == Eric Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Eric> This problem pretty much happens on any machine without a
Eric> compiler installed. What would be ideal is if config.guess
Eric> didn't require a compiler.
> Can it happ
Akim Demaille wrote:
> > "Eric" == Eric Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Eric> This problem pretty much happens on any machine without a
> Eric> compiler installed. What would be ideal is if config.guess
> Eric> didn't require a compiler.
>
> Can it happen that one needs the infor
> "Eric" == Eric Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Eric> This problem pretty much happens on any machine without a
Eric> compiler installed. What would be ideal is if config.guess
Eric> didn't require a compiler.
Can it happen that one needs the information given by config.guess if
sh
%% Ben Elliston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> BTW this problem doesn't just occur on RedHat Linux boxes without a C
>> compiler. I have a RedHat 6.1 box here which has gcc installed, but
>> only as `gcc' and not as `cc'. I'm not totally sure how it got this
>> way since the egcs rpm do
> BTW this problem doesn't just occur on RedHat Linux boxes without a C
> compiler. I have a RedHat 6.1 box here which has gcc installed, but
> only as `gcc' and not as `cc'. I'm not totally sure how it got this
> way since the egcs rpm does have /usr/bin/cc in. I suspect I built
> gcc-2.95.2 f
> This problem pretty much happens on any machine without a compiler
> installed. What would be ideal is if config.guess didn't require a
> compiler.
That's impossible.
Many of the tests in config.guess use runtime tests to produce accurate
results. These programs have to be built and run. We
> BTW this problem doesn't just occur on RedHat Linux boxes without a C
> compiler. I have a RedHat 6.1 box here which has gcc installed, but
> only as `gcc' and not as `cc'. I'm not totally sure how it got this
> way since the egcs rpm does have /usr/bin/cc in. I suspect I built
> gcc-2.95.2
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Paul D. Smith" writes:
> 1) Have AC_CANONICAL_HOST require AC_PROG_CC, as Ossama suggested. One
>problem here is that not all runs of config.guess _do_ require a C
>compiler, and it's a minor drag that you can't use AC_CANONICAL_HOST
>without a C compi
Hello, Paul!
> 1) Have AC_CANONICAL_HOST require AC_PROG_CC, as Ossama suggested. One
> problem here is that not all runs of config.guess _do_ require a C
> compiler, and it's a minor drag that you can't use AC_CANONICAL_HOST
> without a C compiler; couldn't we write a configure.in
%% Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
tom> In general send config.guess problems to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well... I would have but I don't have a patch :).
Anyway, it's not clear that the entire problem is config.guess, here.
Paul> Should I move AC_CANONICAL_HOST to _after_ my test for
P
> "Paul" == Paul D Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Paul> Well, until recently GNU make was a happy _non_-user of
Paul> config.guess :). However, in order to support LFS I needed to
Paul> add AC_CANONICAL_HOST to configure.in.
Paul> [ ... ]
In general send config.guess problems to [EMAIL P
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 12:59:27PM -0500, Paul D. Smith wrote:
> Should I move AC_CANONICAL_HOST to _after_ my test for AC_PROG_CC, and
> figure out how to invoke config.guess in such a way as to use the
> compiler it finds, or what? Am I using a too-old config.guess; has this
> been fixed i
Well, until recently GNU make was a happy _non_-user of config.guess
:). However, in order to support LFS I needed to add AC_CANONICAL_HOST
to configure.in.
It seems that everyone puts this right up front, before any other
checking, so I did too.
But, I just got a bug report from someone on a R
13 matches
Mail list logo
