Re: changequote used incorrectly

2000-09-07 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 02:12:34PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > - > However, in a few places the macros need to use brackets (usually in C > program text or regular expressions). In those places, they use the `m4' > builtin command `changequote' to temporarily change the quote charact

Re: HTML format documentation

2000-09-07 Thread Russ Allbery
Greg A Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [ On , September 6, 2000 at 21:57:04 (-0700), Russ Allbery wrote: ] >> You need both; > Actually no, as I tried to explain earlier you do not want to be able to > adjust $(prefix) during any "make" execution, at least not the way many > people use $(pr

Re: changequote used incorrectly

2000-09-07 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello, Lars! I'm moving the discussion to [EMAIL PROTECTED] where it seems more appropriate. >From the discussion in [EMAIL PROTECTED] > : # Check for any special shared library compilation flags. > : -changequote(,)dnl > : if test -n "$ac_cv_prog_cc_shlib"; then > :AC_MSG_WARN([\`$CC' re

Re: [autoconf] HTML format documentation

2000-09-07 Thread RĂ¼diger Kuhlmann
Hi! >--[Greg A. Woods]--<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [ On , September 6, 2000 at 21:57:04 (-0700), Russ Allbery wrote: ] > very different in what they do. Indeed it should be possible to adjust > ${DESTDIR} during "make install" (and it would only have effect during > "make install"). $(prefix) spec

RE: AC_C_BIGENDIAN add a default if failed parameter

2000-09-07 Thread Bernard Dautrevaux
> -Original Message- > From: Caolan McNamara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 9:21 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: AC_C_BIGENDIAN add a default if failed parameter > > > On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Guido Draheim wrote: > > This case of [AC_C_BIGENDIAN fai

Re: HTML format documentation

2000-09-07 Thread Greg A. Woods
[ On Thursday, September 7, 2000 at 05:51:44 (-0600), Richard Stallman wrote: ] > Subject: Re: HTML format documentation > > We can think of /bin as a place where a few things get "promoted" > which would normally be in /usr/bin. In the past, sysadmins often > moved programs between /bin and /usr

Re: HTML format documentation

2000-09-07 Thread Greg A. Woods
[ On Thursday, September 7, 2000 at 05:51:46 (-0600), Richard Stallman wrote: ] > Subject: Re: HTML format documentation > > Call it what you will, but that's explicitly what I mean -- a variable > that will provide a prefix where all installation activities will occur > but which will

Re: HTML format documentation

2000-09-07 Thread Greg A. Woods
[ On , September 6, 2000 at 21:57:04 (-0700), Russ Allbery wrote: ] > Subject: Re: HTML format documentation > > Paul D Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > %% Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>> * Is the advantage big enough to justify the incompatible change > >>> of saying "Yo

Re: HTML format documentation

2000-09-07 Thread Ole Aamot
(I have cc'ed this mail to Daniel Quinlan, the FHS coordinator.) Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Unless the GNU System also wants to make the leap of eliminating either > /usr, or /bin and /sbin, it's necessary to use (or at least imply the > use of) "--prefix=/" to in

Re: HTML format documentation

2000-09-07 Thread Richard Stallman
For instance, if we do decide to support some --docdir, or --htmldir etc., in a large tree with several configures of different generations (which is always likely to happen), then outer configures might pass a --htmldir which an inner configure won't understand, and it will choke

Re: HTML format documentation

2000-09-07 Thread Richard Stallman
Alexandre> Of course, sometimes it's convenient to change these Alexandre> options at build time, but the potential for trouble is Alexandre> such that I wouldn't recommend this practice. I would even prevent this practice, make it invalid. I am not sure exactly which practice yo

Re: HTML format documentation

2000-09-07 Thread Richard Stallman
> No, in GNU these programs should not be in /usr/local, because they > *are* "the system". Ah, yes, exactly. Except that even the GNU System has add-on third-party packages and indeed I believe, correct me if I'm wrong, that it is the practice on GNU systems to use /usr/loca

Re: HTML format documentation

2000-09-07 Thread Richard Stallman
Call it what you will, but that's explicitly what I mean -- a variable that will provide a prefix where all installation activities will occur but which will be invisible (i.e. not used) during run time. This sounds exactly the same as what exec_prefix does now. I see you THINK you ar

Re: AC_C_BIGENDIAN add a default if failed parameter

2000-09-07 Thread Caolan McNamara
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Guido Draheim wrote: > This case of [AC_C_BIGENDIAN failure] would enforce the autoconf'ed package > installer to go without autoconf'ed configure, whereas that is the case > we have now for *everyone* trying to cross-compile packages containing > AC_C_BIGENDIAN. > Mind yo