Martin wrote:
>configure.in:20: warning: AC_PROG_CPP was called before AC_PROG_F77
>configure.in:21: warning: AC_PROG_F77 was called before AC_PROG_F77_C_O
These seem bogus to me, too.
>Another issue: I question whether "g77" should really be the first-choice
>Fortran compiler on systems with bo
> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alexandre> On Jul 10, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> elif test -f "$ac_given_srcdir/$f"; then
Alexandre> This shouldn't be done when $f is a full pathname.
Well:
+ for f in $ac_file_in; do
+ case $f i
On Jul 10, 2000, "Lars J. Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 01:21:54PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> : On Jul 10, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> : > elif test -f "$ac_given_srcdir/$f"; then
> :
> : This shouldn't be done when $f is a full pat
The following warnings
configure.in:20: warning: AC_PROG_CPP was called before AC_PROG_F77
configure.in:21: warning: AC_PROG_F77 was called before AC_PROG_F77_C_O
are issued by autoconf, because of AC_BEFORE statements in AC_PROG_F77 and
AC_PROG_F77_C_O. I don't understand both statements, for
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 01:21:54PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
: On Jul 10, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > elif test -f "$ac_given_srcdir/$f"; then
:
: This shouldn't be done when $f is a full pathname.
Are you crazy? Full pathnames aren't supported yet ;) - not
On Jul 10, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> elif test -f "$ac_given_srcdir/$f"; then
This shouldn't be done when $f is a full pathname.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com,
On Jul 10, 2000, "Lars J. Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 05:02:51PM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
> : > "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : Alexandre> How about `pwd`? :-)
> :
> : I don't understand the pwd stuff, but here is my proposal.
> "Martin" == Martin Wilck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> I am very sorry I messed up things again :(
No problem, we're responsible too, since we didn't walk fast enough to
catch up with you.
Martin> Yes, the new patch obsoletes my previous stuff, although it is
Martin> the same code,
> "Pavel" == Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Pavel> Sorry, wget-1.5.3 is the latest version, and yet it knows
Pavel> nothing about the binary mode. I'm screwed too, just like your
Pavel> proxy :-)
Yep, it does :)
Wget also supports the `type' feature for FTP URLs. By default,
Dear Akim Demaille, you wrote on Friday:
> You're losing us Martin. I was still waiting for approvals from
> Alexandre to be able to apply the previous patches I approved :)
> If you mean to obsolete all your previous patches with this one,
> please say so.
>
> but the diff you send us is no l
Looks OK to me.
Lars J
Akim,
> | /tmp % wget ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/GNUinfo/make-stds.texi
> | --17:10:23-- ftp://ftp.gnu.org:21/gnu/GNUinfo/make-stds.texi
> |=> `make-stds.texi'
> | Connecting to proxy.epi.net:3128... connected!
> | Proxy request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
> | Length: unspecified [a
> "Pavel" == Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Pavel> wget ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/GNUinfo/make-stds.texi gives me
Pavel> make-stds.texi which is 36362 bytes long. This is the same what
Pavel> "dir" shows on the GNU server. This file has UNIX line endings
Pavel> only.
:(
| /tmp % wget
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 05:02:51PM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
: > "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Alexandre> How about `pwd`? :-)
:
: I don't understand the pwd stuff, but here is my proposal.
What I figured Alexandre meant was that since support for absolute
pa
> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alexandre> On Jul 10, 2000, "Lars J. Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> How about tagging it with "^/" instead?
Alexandre> How about `pwd`? :-)
I don't understand the pwd stuff, but here is my proposal.
To answer a question you w
Akim,
> >> Is it something related to the use of wget? Or are the GNU std
> >> really in DOS?
wget ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/GNUinfo/make-stds.texi
gives me make-stds.texi which is 36362 bytes long. This is the same what
"dir" shows on the GNU server. This file has UNIX line endings only.
> Pavel>
> "Pavel" == Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Pavel> Akim,
>> Is it something related to the use of wget? Or are the GNU std
>> really in DOS?
Pavel> No, they are not in DOS. You can check previous revisions -
Pavel> they are in UNIX.
Well, Netscape seems to agree they are in DOS (
Akim,
> Is it something related to the use of wget? Or are the GNU std really
> in DOS?
No, they are not in DOS. You can check previous revisions - they are in
UNIX.
I guess, the "commit" script should do more sanity checks on the files
being committed. Better worry than sorry.
Pavel
> "Pavel" == Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Pavel> Hello! The following files on the autoconf CVS have DOS-style
Pavel> line endings:
Pavel> doc/make-stds.texi doc/standards.texi doc/texinfo.tex
Ahhh! That's the problem we're facing with makeinfo. Thanks a lot!
Is it something
On Jul 10, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Akim> I like it very much, and much approve it.
> Alexandre, I need a second approval for this one.
Sorry, I thought I had already approved it. It's ok.
--
Alexandre Oliva E
| Thanks for the comments.
| Yet one questions: when autoconf 1.4 will be released ?
Autoconf 2.50. I guess September.
| If not "in next few days", than may be better put it on autoconf archive
| without using of not-existing-release futures ?
As you like. We should snapshot in July I thi
> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Akim> I like it very much, and much approve it.
Alexandre, I need a second approval for this one. It does not include
the $builddir stuff.
Akim Demaille wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Thanks for the contribution.
>
> It is too late for us to include brand new macros in Autoconf, we're
> trying to rel*se it (hm, that word hurts :). I'm unsure whether it
Thanks for the comments.
Yet one questions: when autoconf 1.4 will be released ?
If not
Hello!
The following files on the autoconf CVS have DOS-style line endings:
doc/make-stds.texi
doc/standards.texi
doc/texinfo.tex
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 08:19:30AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
: On Jul 10, 2000, "Lars J. Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > How about tagging it with "^/" instead?
:
: How about `pwd`? :-)
OK, feel free to remove the ./ pattern patching then. I assume I won't have
to resubmit the patch...
On Jul 10, 2000, "Lars J. Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about tagging it with "^/" instead?
How about `pwd`? :-)
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 05:58:18AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
: On Jul 8, 2000, "Lars J. Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > + Source files can now also be specified with absolute (/)
: > + and builddir-relative (./) paths.
:
: I don't like `./'; it may well be the result of some scripting
On 10 Jul 2000, Akim Demaille wrote:
> > "Mo" == Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Mo> I took a peek at the config.guess and found this.
>
> See http://sources.redhat.com/ml/autoconf/2000-04/msg00097.html and
> following :)
We should keep a "confusion tally" for sections of the cod
On Jul 10, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alexandre> On Jul 9, 2000, Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> My real question is, why do I need to do this? If autoconf knows
>>> that it is cross compiling then it s
On Jul 8, 2000, "Lars J. Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> + Source files can now also be specified with absolute (/)
> + and builddir-relative (./) paths.
I don't like `./'; it may well be the result of some scripting such as
`dirname foo`/foo, which will break. I'd rather have a VPATH-like
> "Mo" == Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mo> I took a peek at the config.guess and found this.
See http://sources.redhat.com/ml/autoconf/2000-04/msg00097.html and
following :)
> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alexandre> On Jul 9, 2000, Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> My real question is, why do I need to do this? If autoconf knows
>> that it is cross compiling then it should know to set the HOST_CC
>> (or BUILD_CC) to gcc or cc.
32 matches
Mail list logo
