Hi!
Shouldn't AC_CANONICAL_* be adjusted to the fact there can be
quadruples now? I'm referring to ensuring that foo_os does not
include the kernel part, and defining {host, target, build}_kernel?
Akim
> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alexandre> Like /tmp/$$$RANDOM.ac? Or ac$$.$RANDOM? Both sound good
Alexandre> to me.
I like ac$$.$RANDOM better, it's easier when you debug to have the
right completion from the shell.
On Apr 5, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alexandre> Except that RANDOM may be not that RANDOM, i.e., it may
Alexandre> randomly clash too, so we'd better retry it a few times
Alexandre> before giving up. It may be
> "Peter" == Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Paul Eggert wrote:
>> The autoconf philosophy is that you shouldn't test for compiler or
>> OS version; you should test for specific features.
Peter> I agree with that in principle. But how does AC_PROG_CC_G
On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Paul Eggert wrote:
> The autoconf philosophy is that you shouldn't test for compiler or OS
> version; you should test for specific features.
I agree with that in principle. But how does AC_PROG_CC_GNU fit in there?
Shouldn't you *test* if the compiler supports -O2 or whatever
> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alexandre> Except that RANDOM may be not that RANDOM, i.e., it may
Alexandre> randomly clash too, so we'd better retry it a few times
Alexandre> before giving up. It may become extremely annoying in case
Alexandre> of a huge packag
> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Akim> I'm in favor of moving the obsolete macros documentation into the
Akim> chapter `Old Names', renamed as `Obsolete Macros'.
Alexandre> Sounds good to me.
Excellent :)
Akim> I'll leave a few @ref where needed.
Alexandre> Ev
