On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 1:50 PM, Lynne Bartholomew
wrote:
> Hi, Warren.
>
> Apologies; not sure whether your "This works for me" note refers to the
> current text or the "Possibly" text. Would you please clarify?
>
Sorry, as Paul notes, this is a direct quote, and so the current should
remain.
On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 8:46 AM, Dan Harkins wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Yes, I confirm. I'm fine publishing without the DOI.
>
Yah, me too!
W
>
> regards,
>
>
>
> Dan.
>
>
>
> --
>
> "the object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to
>
> escape finding oneself in t
On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 3:05 PM, Alanna Paloma wrote:
> Hi Gábor and Warren (AD)*,
>
> *Warren - As the AD, please review and approve of the updated key word in
> Section 4.4:
>
> Original:
> [RFC4814] REQUIRES pseudorandom port numbers, which the authors believe is
> a good approximation of the
Approved!
Thank you very much!
W
On Tue, Dec 17 2024 at 6:39 PM, Sandy Ginoza wrote:
> Hi Warren and Dan,
>
> Pulling this request to the top:
>
> Please confirm you approve the RFC for publication.
>
> We request your approval because it’s not a matter of publishing without a
> DOI; we have
[ + Med ]
I believe that this is fine (and good!), but I'm adding Med as the current
OpsAD for formal approval.
W
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 11:22 AM, Madison Church <
mchu...@staff.rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> Hi Authors, *Warren,
>
> Authors - Thank you for your replies! We have noted your approval
I agree with all of Jeff's comments, other than the change from
"Traditional" to "Conventional"
To me, "conventional" means doing something according to convention - the
commonly agreed upon manner. For example, "By convention, we state
temperature in degrees Celsius". This is what we do now / tod
I also approve publication.
Thank you,
W
On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 5:49 PM, Karen Moore
wrote:
> Authors,
>
> We have also noted Sriram’s approval on the AUTH48 status page (https://
> www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9774).
>
> Best regards,
> RFC Editor/kc
>
> On May 6, 2025, at 2:46 PM, Karen Moor
On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 4:29 PM, John Scudder wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> About the use of “traditional”, I looked at the current version, and I
> have a suggestion. After reading the text with any of the suggested
> adjectives, none of them fills me with happiness. I think that’s because
> “brief” is n
