[auth48] Re: [AD] re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9758 for your review

2025-04-01 Thread Rick Taylor via auth48archive
;> > >>>>> ipn URI scheme -> ‘ipn’ URI scheme (throughout the text) > >>>>> ipn scheme URIs -> 'ipn' scheme URIs (8 instances) > >>>>> ipn scheme -> 'ipn' scheme (3 instances: Sections 7.1, 8.3, and 9) > >&g

[auth48] Re: [EXT] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9758 for your review

2025-03-25 Thread Rick Taylor via auth48archive
L. > >> > >> > >> 6) We will await a reply from Ed for the following three questions: > >> > >>> #2) >> The updated XML file is here: > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9758.xml > >> > >> The updated output files

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9758 for your review

2025-05-16 Thread Rick Taylor via auth48archive
xt) > > ipn scheme URIs -> 'ipn' scheme URIs (8 instances) > > ipn scheme -> 'ipn' scheme (3 instances: Sections 7.1, 8.3, and 9) > > > > Note that we updated “IPN URI scheme” to "‘ipn’ URI scheme" in the > > examples in Sections 6.1.1 a