Dear Madison, Dear Eliot,
thanks for your suggestions. As for the conversion Latin --> Hebrew of the
example date, we have probably used a wrong converter, so we agree to use the
conversion you suggest.
As for the rest, please find in-line our replies.
Thanks!
Pierluigi and Enrico
_
Dear Madison,
thanks for your additional remarks! Please find below (in-line) our comments
and proposals.
Best regards
Pierluigi and Enrico
From: Madison Church
Sent: 29 January 2025 22:52
To: ENRICO FRANCESCONI ; pierluigi.spin...@gmail.com
; caterina.l.
Dear Eliot,
sorry for such a delay: there were several remarks in the last review, and
we took a bit more time than expected to clarify and process them. We are
basically ready to send our feedback. We'll do that in the next few hours.
Thanks for your understanding
Enrico
Dear Colleagues,
thanks a lot for your extensive review of the URN:LEX draft and sorry for
our delay.
We have reported in a new draft all your remarks accepting your proposals,
except the ones still in doubts. Please find them, in-line, here below. Once
clarified these last doubts, we can sub
Dear Eliot,
thanks for your feedback. Below in-line our remarks. If all is good, we will
upload the next version (25), where all the remaining issues are fixed.
Thanks!
Pierluigi and Enrico
From: Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear)
Sent: 12 Decemb
Dear Madison, Eliot,
thanks for your remarks, it is actually our interest to have the document
finalised and sorry for this additional trouble.
As for the previous submission, the instructions email reported what follows:
> You may submit your changes in one of two ways:
>
> An update to the
Dear Madison and Eliot,
please find here below (in-line) our feedback. In case of additional remarks
please let us know.
Best
Pierluigi and Enrico
From: Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear)
Sent: 24 January 2025 18:06
To: Madison Church ; ENRICO FRANCESCONI
; pierluigi.spin...@gma
Hi Eliot,
yes, we are on it. Let us double check the document and will be back soon.
We are obviously interested to have it finished very soon too.
Best
Enrico
On 8 Apr 2025, at 17:38, Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear)
wrote:
Enrico, authors,
Could you please review? I'd li
Hi Madison,
we double checked the latest changes and everything seems ok. So for us we
can proceed.
Thanks again for your collaboration!
Pierluigi and Enrico
> On 15 Apr 2025, at 17:43, Madison Church wrote:
>
> Hi Enrico,
>
> Thank you for your reply! We have updated the document as
Dear Madison,
thanks a lot for your collaboration!
We have double checked the latest version and we found the following issues:
1) At the end of section 3.4. "Unicode Characters Outside the ASCII Range"
- at Munich circular, the UTF-8 code still includes %xC3%xBC instead of %C3%BC,
- at Law of
Dear Madison and Eliot,
thanks for your feedback about dates and different conversion formats.
In this respect, we noticed a potential issue in the fact that the Hebrew date
is written using spaces. Now, the LEX specifications suggest to replace spaces
with dots. On the other hand in the dates
Dear Madison and Eliot,
thanks for your feedback about dates and different conversion formats.
In this respect, we noticed a potential issue in the fact that the Hebrew date
is written using spaces. Now, the LEX specifications suggest to replace spaces
with dots. On the other hand in the dates
Dear Madison and Eliot,
just an additional remark: as for the UTF-8 format, we think that in the RFC
we should report the version without ‘x’, which is just meant to indicate that
what follows are hex values.
Basically something like:
%xd7%x98… —> %d7%98…
which is the encoding used in URLs
Dear Madison and Eliot,
we were preparing an answer to the previous message, when we received two
new emails of yours.
We report in the following our reply which partially addresses the issue on
Hebrew characters you underline in your message.
As for the alternatives you propose, we agree with
Dear Eliot,
the latest email of ours was on March 6th about spaces in Hebrew dates. In
our opinion it was the last issue to fix. We are now waiting for feedback.
Best
Enrico
On 31 Mar 2025, at 20:25, Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear)
wrote:
Madison, Enrico, where are we?
Eli
Dear Sandy,
thanks for your feedback!
After a new double check, we found the following minor issue to fix at section
2.1:
jurisdiction-unit The possible administrative hierarchical
—>
jurisdiction-unit: The possible administrative hierarchical
As for the points you addressed
>
> a) Section
16 matches
Mail list logo
