Christopher Dimech writes:
> One thing is that expl3 style files allow use of underscore, but latex
> mode treats them an subscripts.
Can you show an example? I know what you mean, but I don't think AUCTeX
does this. Have a look at the screenshot I've provided here[1]; this is
with 'emacs -Q'
> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2025 at 10:05 AM
> From: "Arash Esbati"
> To: auctex-devel@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Improving LaTeX3 support in style/expl3.el
>
> Hi Florent,
>
> Florent Rougon writes:
>
> > I don't have time for AUCTeX hacking unfor
Hi Florent,
Florent Rougon writes:
> I don't have time for AUCTeX hacking unfortunately,
Too bad, of course ;-)
> but am happy to answer questions on expl3 if you need and if I know
> the answers. :-)
Thanks, may be I come back to that, but I'd like to get some feedback
from people who actual
Hi Arash,
Le 06/03/2025, Arash Esbati a écrit:
> Thanks for your response. I think I have to work on some rough edges in
> order to get the fontification[1], in-buffer completion, identing
> etc. right, but I think it is doable.
>
> I'd appreciate feedback in that regard, I personally don't do
Hi Florent,
Florent Rougon writes:
> This looks good to me, thank you!
Thanks for your response. I think I have to work on some rough edges in
order to get the fontification[1], in-buffer completion, identing
etc. right, but I think it is doable.
I'd appreciate feedback in that regard, I pers
Hi Arash,
Le 04/03/2025, Arash Esbati a écrit:
> I think we can improve the support for LaTeX3 programming in
> style/expl3. I had a brief look at interfaces.pdf and there is not much
> code needed to get completion support for macro defining commands. My
> initial approach on this is attached
Hi all,
I think we can improve the support for LaTeX3 programming in
style/expl3. I had a brief look at interfaces.pdf and there is not much
code needed to get completion support for macro defining commands. My
initial approach on this is attached.
Reg. fontification: My current thinking is to
