Apologies; "two or more signalling links in a linkset" below should have
been "more than two signalling links in a linkset"
On 2020-01-09 10:38 pm, Gregory Massel wrote:
Hello all,
I've picked up bugs in libss7-2.0.0 and within sig_ss7.c (chan_dahdi).
- Libss7-2.0.0
hey can be incorporated into future versions of libss7 and Asterisk.
Thank you
Gregory Massel
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-ss7 mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update optio
context = from-pstn
Regards,
Lucian
FROM: asterisk-ss7-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-ss7-boun...@lists.digium.com] ON BEHALF OF Gregory
Massel
SENT: Monday, December 15, 2014 1:06 PM
TO: asterisk-ss7@lists.digium.com
SUBJECT: Re: [asterisk-ss7] libss7 - two linksets with different DP
email: mi...@enterux.in <mailto:mi...@enterux.in>
DID: +91-22-71967196
Cell: +91-9820332422
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Gregory Massel <mailto:g...@csurf.co.za>> wrote:
libss7 supports this but chan_ss7 doesn't.
On 2014/12/15 11:19 AM, Kaloyan Kovachev wrote:
libss7 supports this but chan_ss7 doesn't.
On 2014/12/15 11:19 AM, Kaloyan Kovachev wrote:
Hi,
it is absolutely normal to have such setup. Each linkset has it's own
CIC numbering
On 2014-12-15 01:06, Lucian Raducanu wrote:
Hi,
Is there any possibility to set up on the same asterisk box 2 E
See https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/T.38+Fax+Gateway
Particularly the line:
exten => 1,n,Set(FAXOPT(gateway)=yes)
which you need on the SIP side of the DAHDI-SIP bridge
On 2014/08/26 08:01 AM, Huseyin Kaya wrote:
Hello
Does anyone has a working libb7 server that able to handle T38
I have had ongoing problems with the VPMOCT256 modules on these cards
that Digium has not been able to resolve as yet. This has occurred in
multiple sites using a number of different cards, so it's definitely not
a case of just one faulty unit. The VPMOCT256 will intermittently cause
dead-silen
I have two Asterisk servers, one with 4x E1 (server A) and another with
16x E1 (server B), both running Asterisk 10.12.2, DAHDI 2.6.2 and
libss7-1.0.2.
I have recently set up TDMoE between the two servers and DACS to map
four of the physical E1's on server B to virtual E1's on server A. Two
o
Quite the opposite. SS7 is used extensively on the interconnect side.
The more the landline subscriber base erodes and voip subscriber base
grows, the more demand there will be fore voip operators to interconnect
with existing landline operators.
Also, from a development perspective, those tha
This does not appear to be an SS7 issue.
Check your cables and connections, particularly for loose contacts or
potential shorts (e.g. where the jumper cable on the Krone block is
making poor contact or the cable hasn't been stripped cleanly and is
touching another pair or the frame itself, or
t piece of information as libss7 and asterisk
versions. Is this with the latest changes made ( see
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1676/ and issue SS7-27)?
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 02:19:10 +0200, Gregory Massel
wrote:
I've picked up a bug in libss7.
The really annoying part of this is that I canno
I've picked up a bug in libss7.
The remote end is sending me two CGB messages, the first to block CICs
1-15 and the second to block CICs 17-31.
My end is responding correctly with CGBA messages, however, only CICs
1-15 show a remote block, despite it acknowledging the block for CICs 17-31.
He
yes and dials it out via chan_dahdi/libss7.
This is why:
ExecIf($[${CALLERID(num-pres)}=allowed_not_screened]?Set(CALLERID(num-pres)=allowed))
Works around the problem.
On May 17, 2012, at 8:39 AM, Gregory Massel wrote:
I'm struggling with what appears to be a bug in libss7...
As
Hello
I'm struggling with a redundant linkset setup in libss7.
When the one of the two signalling links goes down, none of the CICs
show as Idle. Calls can still be received, however, none can be made
out. Also, libss7 does not automatically block the CICs associated with
the E1's that have f
I'm struggling with what appears to be a bug in libss7...
Asterisk 10.4.0, libss7 1.0.2, dahdi-linux-complete-2.6.1+2.6.1
When a call comes into the box using SIP (sendrpid=yes, trustrpid=yes),
caller ID is not presented on the SS7 channel. A debug shows that libss7
thinks the call is supposed
Hello
Is anyone using libss7 on Asterisk 10 with T.38 gateway (or without
using T.38)?
I've got two boxes on Asterisk 1.8 with libss7 (in addition to a few
with Ast 1.8 and chan_ss7) that are pretty stable and was just wondering
whether it's worth upgrading the libss7 boxes to Asterisk 10, w
fficult to change the applicable code.
On 2011/11/21 02:11 PM, Gregory Massel wrote:
Looking at l4isup.c and the dump, I'm just wondering, is it correct
behaviour to have an empty optionals section?
e.g. code like the following in isup_send_rlc():
isup_msg_start_optional_part(msg, sizeof(ms
ions
are such that no optionals need to be added?
--Greg
On 2011/11/21 01:36 PM, Gregory Massel wrote:
I have the exact same condition with chan_ss7 on Asterisk 1.4 and
Asterisk 1.8 and can confirm that I've run all versions of chan_ss7
from 1.3 up to 2.1.0 (2.1.0 on Asterisk 1.8 and the pre
I have the exact same condition with chan_ss7 on Asterisk 1.4 and
Asterisk 1.8 and can confirm that I've run all versions of chan_ss7 from
1.3 up to 2.1.0 (2.1.0 on Asterisk 1.8 and the previous versions on
Asterisk 1.4).
The remote end is, to the best of my knowledge, a Siemens EWSD.
The fol
I forgot to mention that the old chan_ss7/ast1.4 is running on 2x Digium
4xE1 cards while the libss7/ast1.8 is running 1x Sangoma A108.
It seems the problem may rest in the wanpipeX.conf files...
On 10/22/2011 3:33 PM, Gregory Massel wrote:
Hello
I'm struggling to move a chan_ss7/as
Hello
I'm struggling to move a chan_ss7/ast 1.4 setup to libss7/ast 1.8. The
MTP2 and CICs come up, but then it goes into a flood of error messages.
I've included logs below.
I would be most appreciative if anyone can suggest what may be wrong.
There are four E1's to one site and four E1's t
Thanks! The NEWS file just says compatibility with 1.8.x has been added.
Have there been any bug fixes (e.g. broken config file processing for
cluster configs, handling of overlapping CIC numbers in combined
linksets) as well or is this purely about compatibility with 1.8?
Are there any plans
Hello
I'm trying to set up a chan_ss7 cluster, however, both chan_ss7 and mtp3d
segfault in config.c when trying to read the [cluster] section of the config
file.
To ensure it wasn't my config, I eventually used the
ss7.conf.template.two-hosts sample (as distributed in the chan_ss7 source)
he problem if you don't use more than 50% of
your capacity. Just a theory...
--Greg
- Original Message -
From: Robert Verspuy
To: Gregory Massel
Cc: asterisk-ss7@lists.digium.com
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: chan_ss7 1.4.3 bug with overlappin
1467]
l4isup.c: Trying to remove CIC=68 from idle list, but not found?!?." and the
associated eventual crash.
Unfortunately I'm a bit out of my depth in terms of locating and modifying
the part of the code where the problem is occ
Hi Edrich
To answer your question, yes, chan_ss7 does support STP setups from version
1.3 upwards.
And both libss7 and chan_ss7 have been used to interconnect with Telkom SA
although both have different limitations which you may bump into down the
line.
The messages about the unhandled option
I wrote the following patch to deal with subscriber numbers and special
characters that we see with subscriber numbers:
--- l4isup.c.old2009-12-06 11:34:42.0 +0200
+++ l4isup.c2010-05-27 11:43:45.0 +0200
@@ -1689,7 +1689,7 @@ static void check_obci(struct ss7_chan*
}
Dear Anders
Please can you confirm whether this version includes Robert's patch
"chan_ss7: patch for overlapping cic codes with 2 redundant signaling
links." I see the release notes refer to "Multiple DPC per linkset handling
(Dutch ISUP)" but it is not clear if this is the same thing.
Thank y
number portability here start with 'D'.
I think it would also be hugely beneficial to be able to set the
international, national and subscriber number prefixes in the config file. I
have not contributed a patch to such effect as I have not studied the
chan_ss7 source code sufficient
Thanks!
I had the same issue in South Africa, but eventually got the network on the
remote end to set up different CIC ranges to work around the issue in
chan_ss7. It's good to have a fix for chan_ss7 that resolves this.
--Greg
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Verspuy"
To:
Sent: Wed
I'm using it with Asterisk 1.4.29 and it works well.
- Original Message -
From: anwarul mamun
To: asterisk-ss7@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 8:18 AM
Subject: [asterisk-ss7] chan_ss7-1.3
Hi All,
Anybody yet tried chan_ss7-1.3? If so, which vers
Hello
I'm running chan_ss7 1.3 on * 1.4.29 and have a high load average (exceeds
1.0) with 90% CPU on Asterisk process and only around 30 calls. Load and CPU
usage seems to vary proportionately with the call volume; it's no issue when
there are only around 15 calls.
Given the hardware (Quad Co
The configuration items you're using (ss7_.*prefix) relate to libss7, not
chan_ss7.
You could swap over to libss7.
Alternatively, if you're using chan_ss7, you need to modify the source, as it
currently doesn't identify subscriber calls.
All the relevent code is in l4isup.c (at least for chan_
use libss7 its work better than chan_ss7
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 5:15 AM, Gregory Massel wrote:
> from chan_ss7 faq:
[snip]
> you can try:
> - newer version of chan_ss7
> - jitter buffer option in ss7.conf
> [jitter]
> jbenable = yes
> from chan_ss7 faq:
[snip]
> you can try:
> - newer version of chan_ss7
> - jitter buffer option in ss7.conf
> [jitter]
> jbenable = yes
> jbmaxsize = 1000
> jbresyncthreshold = 1000
> jbimpl = adaptive
Thank you!
Apologies for asking a question in the FAQ. One more question: where do I
find th
Hello
I'm getting the following errors:
[Jan 26 19:40:39] NOTICE[9960]: l4isup.c:2434 ss7_write: Write buffer full
on CIC=122 (wrote only 0 of 160), audio lost (suppress 17).
[Jan 26 19:40:50] NOTICE[9960]: l4isup.c:2434 ss7_write: Write buffer full
on CIC=122 (wrote only 0 of 160), audio lost
Hello
I can compile chan_ss7 1.3 cleanly against Asterisk 1.4.29, however, get the
following errors when compiling against Asterisk 1.6.0.21:
l4isup.c: In function âss7_writeâ:
l4isup.c:2400: error: request for member âptrâ in something not a structure
or union
l4isup.c: In function âsetup_cicâ
Hello
I was just wondernig if anyone has successfully used libss7 to interconnect
with Telkom or the MNOs in South Africa?
Alternatively, if you've successfully interconnected libss7 with a Siemens
EWSD running software v17, that should answer my question.
I did see Steve's post from 2007 sugg
38 matches
Mail list logo
