Re: U-Boot 2022.10 and dtb from Linux 6.0.8

2023-05-08 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Sun, 7 May 2023 17:54:17 + > From: Klemens Nanni > > On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 06:30:55PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > As I've said before, the u-boot developers have poor quality control > > and this will almost certainly break some targets. > > > > I think the way forward is to h

Re: U-Boot 2022.10 and dtb from Linux 6.0.8

2023-05-08 Thread Patrick Wildt
> Am 07.05.2023 um 19:54 schrieb Klemens Nanni : > > On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 06:30:55PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: >> As I've said before, the u-boot developers have poor quality control >> and this will almost certainly break some targets. >> >> I think the way forward is to have a u-boot p

Re: U-Boot 2022.10 and dtb from Linux 6.0.8

2023-05-08 Thread Mark Kettenis
> From: Patrick Wildt > Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 14:14:27 +0200 > > > Am 07.05.2023 um 19:54 schrieb Klemens Nanni : > > > > On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 06:30:55PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > >> As I've said before, the u-boot developers have poor quality control > >> and this will almost certainly

Re: U-Boot 2022.10 and dtb from Linux 6.0.8

2023-05-08 Thread David Gwynne
> On 8 May 2023, at 22:44, Mark Kettenis wrote: > >> From: Patrick Wildt >> Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 14:14:27 +0200 >> >>> Am 07.05.2023 um 19:54 schrieb Klemens Nanni : >>> >>> On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 06:30:55PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: As I've said before, the u-boot developers have