> Date: Sun, 7 May 2023 17:54:17 +0000 > From: Klemens Nanni <k...@openbsd.org> > > On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 06:30:55PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > As I've said before, the u-boot developers have poor quality control > > and this will almost certainly break some targets. > > > > I think the way forward is to have a u-boot port per SoC such that we > > can leave older SoCs using an older U-Boot version that we know to be > > good while newer SoCs can switch to a newer version after testing a > > few boards. > > That should always work. Not sure if pulling them out of the main u-boot > port one by one or all at once is better, though.
I'd do it one-by-one. > For the 2207.* update it seemed as if the Pinebook Pro's breakage alone kept > all others boards on outdated versions and we practically have no other way > of disentangling this mess, afaict. > > We already have sysutils/u-boot-asahi. > > Would mean some ports shuffling and installing more package where boot media > is built, but that doesn't seem like too much work.
