Re: Pacman lite?

2025-05-17 Thread Pocket
On 5/17/25 5:21 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Sat, 2025-05-17 at 08:03 +, Edward Toroshchyn wrote: Without knowing more about the problem you're solving it's hard to give a more specific advice. Good point! I guess dependencies such as bash or systemd might be a concern. If you're want a

Re: Pacman lite?

2025-05-17 Thread Pocket
On 5/17/25 4:03 AM, Edward Toroshchyn wrote: pacman is open source, so of course you can change it however you want. Without knowing more about the problem you're solving it's hard to give a more specific advice. If you're want a minimalistic OS and/or package manager, have you looked at

Pacman lite?

2025-05-16 Thread Pocket
Is it possible to build a neutered version of pacman? A pacman lite if you will I need to cut down on the dependencies pacman requires. Without key signing and package signing. I would like to only have package building and package management and pull from an http respository. This is

Re: Package building and signing

2025-05-06 Thread Pocket
On 5/6/25 6:17 AM, Markus Schaaf wrote: Am 04.05.25 um 19:13 schrieb Pocket:   gpg —full-gen-key gpg —export —armor —output public-key.asc  pocket gpg —export-secret-keys —armor —output private-key.asc pocket The key id is pocket. For each key/attempt I  imported each key into Pacman-key

Re: Building in a clean chroot

2025-05-05 Thread Pocket
On 5/4/25 9:33 PM, u...@net9.cf wrote: Pocket wrote: On 5/4/25 3:12 PM, Doug Newgard wrote: On 5/4/25 8:20 AM, Pocket wrote: I am getting this error when running is there a way to fix this? We aren't the ones to be asking. Arch is x86_64 only, ArchLinuxARM is a separate distro

Re: Building in a clean chroot

2025-05-04 Thread Pocket
On 5/4/25 3:12 PM, Doug Newgard wrote: On 5/4/25 8:20 AM, Pocket wrote: I am getting this error when running is there a way to fix this? We aren't the ones to be asking. Arch is x86_64 only, ArchLinuxARM is a separate distro with it's own repositories. This is what I

Re: Building in a clean chroot

2025-05-04 Thread Pocket
On 5/4/25 3:12 PM, Doug Newgard wrote: On 5/4/25 8:20 AM, Pocket wrote: I am getting this error when running is there a way to fix this? We aren't the ones to be asking. Arch is x86_64 only, ArchLinuxARM is a separate distro with it's own repositories. I heard you the first t

Refreshing pacman database

2025-05-04 Thread Pocket
pacman -Syy refreshes all db for all repositories Is there a way to have pacman only refresh a single repository db? Ie pacman -Syy custom only refreshes custom withou refreshing core extra etc -- Hindi madali ang maging ako

Re: Building in a clean chroot

2025-05-04 Thread Pocket
On 5/4/25 3:12 PM, Doug Newgard wrote: On 5/4/25 8:20 AM, Pocket wrote: I am getting this error when running is there a way to fix this? We aren't the ones to be asking. Arch is x86_64 only, ArchLinuxARM is a separate distro with it's own repositories. I found something i

Re: Package building and signing

2025-05-04 Thread Pocket
Sent from my iPhone > On May 4, 2025, at 11:50 AM, u...@net9.cf wrote: > > Pocket wrote: > >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>>> On May 4, 2025, at 9:21 AM, u...@net9.cf wrote: >>> >>> Pocket wrote: >>> >>&g

Re: Package building and signing

2025-05-04 Thread Pocket
Sent from my iPhone > On May 4, 2025, at 9:21 AM, u...@net9.cf wrote: > > Pocket wrote: > >> >> I am building packages using makepkg for the raspberry pi 4 platform >> >> I changed the CFLAGS adding -march=armv8-a -mtune=cortex-a72 (makepkg.conf

Building in a clean chroot

2025-05-04 Thread Pocket
I am getting this error when running is there a way to fix this? Using makechrootpkg -c -r "$CHROOT" -- --ignorearch --skippgpcheck works fine $ arch-nspawn $CHROOT/root pacman -Syy :: Synchronizing package databases... custom 11.5 KiB 261 KiB/

Package building and signing

2025-05-04 Thread Pocket
I am building packages using makepkg for the raspberry pi 4 platform I changed the CFLAGS adding -march=armv8-a -mtune=cortex-a72 (makepkg.conf). I started to build all the packages that make up the "Building in a clean chroot" following the building in a claen chroot on the wiki. All when w

Re: Building with cmake

2025-04-21 Thread Pocket
On 4/21/25 2:41 AM, Robin Candau wrote: On 4/21/25 4:15 AM, Pocket wrote: I am building packages following DeveloperWiki:Building in a clean chroot When building packages that are associated with gnome I get the following error:   CMake Error at wsrep-lib/CMakeLists.txt:5

Building with cmake

2025-04-20 Thread Pocket
I am building packages following DeveloperWiki:Building in a clean chroot When building packages that are associated with gnome I get the following error: CMake Error at wsrep-lib/CMakeLists.txt:5 (cmake_minimum_required): Compatibility with CMake < 3.5 has been removed from CMake. Updat

Mail Server: A new beginning

2024-11-05 Thread Pocket
I have read the information previous supplied and found some useful tidbits/information. This is to better explain what I am trying to accomplish server alarm.home.org <-- fetchmail<-- 1...@example.org Dovecot/SMTP<-- 2...@example.org

Re: Mail server

2024-11-05 Thread Pocket
On 11/5/24 04:31, Uwe Koloska wrote: I just need help setting up multiple accounts (smarthost) to www.twc.com. One of the following, opensmtpd | postfix | exim. This is easy with postfix and well documented: http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#client_sasl_sender Hope this helps Uwe

Re: Mail server

2024-11-04 Thread Pocket
On 11/4/24 17:44, David C. Rankin wrote: On 11/4/24 11:09 AM, Pocket wrote: I am looking to setup an email server for home use. I want to replace a debian server on a RPI 4 to an archlinux arm on RPI 4. I have dovecot and postifix on the debian rpi presently. It is not working as needed

Re: Mail server

2024-11-04 Thread Pocket
On 11/4/24 15:50, Polarian wrote: Just a note, If this is being done on residential broadband then good luck, its very unlikely to work. A large number of ISPs block/filter port 25 (which is used to relay emails) to "protect against spam". Not to mention the horrific IP reputations which mos

Mail server

2024-11-04 Thread Pocket
I am looking to setup an email server for home use. I want to replace a debian server on a RPI 4 to an archlinux arm on RPI 4. I have dovecot and postifix on the debian rpi presently. It is not working as needed. I have looked at the relative wiki pages for postfix, exim, opensmtpd and dovec

Re: PKGBUILD: nodejs

2024-04-17 Thread Pocket
On 4/17/24 18:44, Doug Newgard wrote: On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 13:01:11 -0400 Pocket wrote: I am trying to build nodejs in a chroot using pkgctl repo clone --protocol=https nodejs pushd nodejs makechrootpkg -c -u -r "$CHROOT" -- --skippgpcheck popd It fails at this point ==

PKGBUILD: nodejs

2024-04-17 Thread Pocket
I am trying to build nodejs in a chroot using pkgctl repo clone --protocol=https nodejs pushd nodejs makechrootpkg -c -u -r "$CHROOT" -- --skippgpcheck popd It fails at this point ==> Entering fakeroot environment... chmod: cannot access '/startdir/pkg': No such file or directory I don't h

building plasma-wayland-protocols

2024-04-13 Thread Pocket
Trying to build plasma-wayland-protocols This is the error I am getting What executable is it looking for? I have built the entire qt5/qt6 stack except for qt5-ukui-platformtheme plasma-wayland-protocols is a dependency of qt5-ukui-platformtheme So I am stuck here Can anyone shed light on t

Building qt-5 packages from PKGBUILD

2024-04-10 Thread Pocket
I have a project where I am building arch packages for raspberry pi's 4/5. Building the base and devtools with all there dependencies I have 2477 completed with some packages being complete failures. In the qt5-* PKGBUILD most fail due to the wrong directory For example in qt5-tools: Build