On 2021-03-02 13:12, Esa Laitinen wrote:
On 02.03.21 10:49, Vittorio Bertola via anti-abuse-wg wrote:
Il 02/03/2021 00:08 Kristijonas Lukas Bukauskas via anti-abuse-wg
ha scritto:
UCEPROTECT blacklists the whole range of IP addresses, including the
full IP range of some autonomous systems:
On 03.03.21 09:35, Kristijonas Lukas Bukauskas wrote:
> Interestingly -- but not unexpectedly -- enough they may add you to
> the uceprotect-level1 list if they see you attempted a payment but
> haven't paid. So, for reasons not related to spamming.
>
>
> The whole autonomous system of my clou
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 11:57:13AM +0100, Esa Laitinen wrote:
> This indeed puts the uceprotect in a different category in my books.
> Please forget what I wrote earlier in this chain.
I do have my own opinion about uceprotect (and it's not favourable), but
we do not need to actually discuss
Hi.
Let me disagree on this misconcept of "endorsement" or "reference" or
"reporting".
There are **plenty** blacklists out there.
RIPE reports specifically UCEPROTECT and SPAMHAUS.
This kind of usage and reference by RIPE empirically
supports/endorses/make those as a reference. (or a troll feed
True. If you’re listing only two BLs - one reputable and the other UCEPROTECT..
there are many other public block lists, ok fewer than there were in the 2000s
but still ..
--srs
From: anti-abuse-wg on behalf of Nuno Vieira
via anti-abuse-wg
Sent: Wednesday, Ma
There are plenty of blacklists and there is no need to "support" just
those two.
So i totally agree that the RIPE should expand the list or remove it
Am 03.03.21 um 12:31 schrieb Nuno Vieira via anti-abuse-wg:
> Hi.
>
> Let me disagree on this misconcept of "endorsement" or "reference" or
> "repo
Dear colleagues,
RIPEstat is a neutral source of information and we aim to provide users
with access to as many data sources as possible to provide insights.
UCEProtect was added as a data source prior to 2010 and is still used by
several network operators to filter traffic into their networks.
I
> UCEProtect was added as a data source prior to 2010 and is still used by
> several network operators to filter traffic into their networks.
> Including it as a data source in RIPEstat allows users to see whether
> resources are included in their lists.
uceful :)
randy
Do you see email providers of significant size using it?
--srs
From: anti-abuse-wg on behalf of Christian
Teuschel
Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 9:57:50 PM
To: anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] UCEPROTECT DNSBL possibly abusive practice and
On 2021-03-04 01:54, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Do you see email providers of significant size using it?
--srs
Potentially Microsoft
[https://www.e-shot.net/insights/help/half-of-the-internet-is-blacklisted-uceprotect].
Office 365 Support has referred to uceprotect-level3 as a possible
As far as I can see that is probably an artefact of an overly helpful customer
service person trying to troubleshoot mail delivery for you
--srs
From: Kristijonas Lukas Bukauskas
Sent: Thursday, March 4, 2021 5:47:38 AM
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian
Cc: christian.t
On 2021-03-04 03:26, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
As far as I can see that is probably an artefact of an overly helpful
customer service person trying to troubleshoot mail delivery for you
I've seen various sources (not sure if they are sufficient to drive any
conclusions though) that Micros
12 matches
Mail list logo
