> On Jul 8, 2021, at 10:52 PM, Brian E Carpenter
> wrote:
>
> I've just come across Jeff Mogul's keynote speech about self-driving (i.e.
> autonomic) networks from a couple of years ago. Well worth reading before
> designing your own autonomic network:
> https://conferences.sigcomm.org/sigc
On Jul 10, 2021, at 12:44 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Alan DeKok wrote:
>> Networks are generally organized by configuration, not by state.
>> i.e. the "state" of the network, such as it is, is buried inside a
>> random grab-bag collection of confi
> Perhaps someone else will find this email useful.
> Mostly, it convinces me to never set any EKU bits.
> I guess, I need to set serverAuth too, now that I think about it.
Yes.
Alan DeKok.
___
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
ps a different question is "Do we want to avoid mandating TLS 1.3 for
everyone *else* in the world, simply because one use-case refuses to upgrade?"
My answer to that would be "no". The benefit gained everywhere else by
mandating TLS 1.3 likely outweighs the minor problems of
andate TLS 1.3 now, but
perhaps we will mandate it one day. I just don't see any of the current
arguments against mandating TLS 1.3 changing in 10 or even 20 years.
Alan DeKok.
___
Anima mailing list -- anima@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to anima-le...@ietf.org
erywhere _else_ is fine. And if that's true, what is the plan for mandating
TLS 1.3, and when we will put that plan into effect.
If those other issues can't be addressed, then by the same token, there's no
need to address the "don't mandate TLS 1.3" argumen
