> So where do we do this cleanup?
> Can it occur in cBRSKI?
Seems fine to me, as we're already making changes to the registry in cBRSKI.
This would fit into that.
I had opened an issue already on GitHub to do this:
https://github.com/anima-wg/constrained-voucher/issues/326
Esko
-Original
Thanks for reviewing!
> Your PR goes from x5bag -> x5chain in many places, and I'm not sure I
> understand why. A few places still say x5bag: I'm not sure which to pick.
It's basically changed to use x5chain to carry a certificate chain in order.
Just trying to use the container as intended: x5
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-anima-constrained-voucher-27.txt is now available.
It is a work item of the Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach
(ANIMA) WG of the IETF.
Title: Constrained Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (cBRSKI)
Authors: Michael Richardson
> My belief is that anything you can do with x5chain you can do with x5bag.
> The receiver will still need to pessimistic about the ordering, and in some
> cases,
Right, I think so too. x5bag is already prepared for unordered cases.
We could just use "x5bag" as the default carrier?
> I think a c
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-anima-brski-cloud-14.txt is now available. It is a
work item of the Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach (ANIMA) WG
of the IETF.
Title: BRSKI Cloud Registrar
Authors: Owen Friel
Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
Michael Richardson
Name:
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 9733
Title: BRSKI with Alternative Enrollment (BRSKI-AE)
Author: D. von Oheimb, Ed.,
S. Fries,
H. Brockhaus
Status: Standards Tra
Dear ANIMA WG & Friends
If you are interested to join a dinner with other ANIMA folks whether
you're already contributing to the WG or are just interested to chat informally
about it during dinner, then please check out your availability on the
following doodle.
https://doodle.com/group-poll/par
Esko Dijk wrote:
> Thanks for reviewing!
>> Your PR goes from x5bag -> x5chain in many places, and I'm not sure I
>> understand why. A few places still say x5bag: I'm not sure which to
pick.
> It's basically changed to use x5chain to carry a certificate chain in
> order. J
