> So where do we do this cleanup?
> Can it occur in cBRSKI?
Seems fine to me, as we're already making changes to the registry in cBRSKI.
This would fit into that.
I had opened an issue already on GitHub to do this:
https://github.com/anima-wg/constrained-voucher/issues/326
Esko
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>
Sent: dinsdag 25 februari 2025 20:24
To: Esko Dijk <esko.d...@iotconsultancy.nl>
Cc: anima@ietf.org; Mahesh Jethanandani <mah...@cisco.com>; i...@iana.org
Subject: Re: [Anima] the RFC8995 BRSKI well-known URIs registry
Esko Dijk <esko.d...@iotconsultancy.nl> wrote:
> Agree with the change from "URI" to "Path Segment".
So where do we do this cleanup?
Can it occur in cBRSKI?
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =- *I*LIKE*TRAINS*
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list -- anima@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to anima-le...@ietf.org
