Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c:3698: warning: Excess function parameter
'adev' description in 'DEFAULT_SH_MEM_BASES'
Cc: Alex Deucher
Cc: "Christian König"
Cc: David Airlie
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Sumit Semwal
Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesk
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/iceland_ih.c:191: warning: Function parameter or
member 'ih' not described in 'iceland_ih_get_wptr'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/iceland_ih.c:223: warning: Function parameter or
member 'ih' not described in 'iceland_ih_d
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/cz_ih.c:191: warning: Function parameter or member
'ih' not described in 'cz_ih_get_wptr'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/cz_ih.c:223: warning: Function parameter or member
'ih' not described in 'cz_ih_decode_iv'
drivers/g
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/tonga_ih.c:193: warning: Function parameter or
member 'ih' not described in 'tonga_ih_get_wptr'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/tonga_ih.c:225: warning: Function parameter or
member 'ih' not described in 'tonga_ih_decode_iv
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 6:19 AM Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> > Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c:637:6: warning: no previous
> > prototype for ‘radeon_device_is_virtual’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> >
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/dce_v11_0.c:255: warning: Function parameter or
member 'async' not described in 'dce_v11_0_page_flip'
Cc: Alex Deucher
Cc: "Christian König"
Cc: David Airlie
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Luben Tuikov
Cc: amd-gfx@lists.fre
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_0.c:848: warning: Function parameter or
member 'job' not described in 'sdma_v4_0_ring_emit_ib'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_0.c:848: warning: Function parameter or
member 'flags' not described in 'sdma_v4
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v5_0.c:403: warning: Function parameter or
member 'job' not described in 'sdma_v5_0_ring_emit_ib'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v5_0.c:403: warning: Function parameter or
member 'flags' not described in 'sdma_v5
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v3_0.c:428: warning: Function parameter or
member 'job' not described in 'sdma_v3_0_ring_emit_ib'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v3_0.c:428: warning: Function parameter or
member 'flags' not described in 'sdma_v3
This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1
kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with
niggly little warnings.
730 out of 5000 left.
Lee Jones (40):
drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker: Fix descriptions for 'drm_device'
drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0: Suppy some missing
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c:95: warning: cannot understand
function prototype: 'struct amdgpu_uvd_cs_ctx '
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c:555: warning: Function parameter or
member 'adev' not described in 'amdgpu_uvd_cs_msg_
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c: In function ‘gfx_v10_rlcg_wreg’:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c:1416:18: warning: variable ‘grbm_idx’
set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c:1415:18: wa
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c:555: warning: Function parameter or
member 'buf_sizes' not described in 'amdgpu_uvd_cs_msg_decode'
Cc: Alex Deucher
Cc: "Christian König"
Cc: David Airlie
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Sumit Semwal
Cc: amd-gfx
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vce.c:97: warning: Function parameter or
member 'size' not described in 'amdgpu_vce_sw_init'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vce.c:441: warning: Function parameter or
member 'bo' not described in 'amdgpu_vce_g
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/uvd_v6_0.c:211: warning: Function parameter or
member 'bo' not described in 'uvd_v6_0_enc_get_create_msg'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/uvd_v6_0.c:211: warning: Excess function parameter
'adev' description in 'uvd_v6_0_en
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c:278: warning: Function parameter or
member 'vmhub' not described in 'gmc_v10_0_flush_gpu_tlb'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c:278: warning: Function parameter or
member 'flush_type' not described in
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/navi10_ih.c:453: warning: Function parameter or
member 'ih' not described in 'navi10_ih_get_wptr'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/navi10_ih.c:512: warning: Function parameter or
member 'ih' not described in 'navi10_ih_decod
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c:2998:6: warning: no previous prototype
for ‘gfx_v9_0_rlc_stop’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
Cc: Alex Deucher
Cc: "Christian König"
Cc: David Airlie
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Sumit Semwal
Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesk
It's used in some, but not all source files which include 'smu_v11_0.h'.
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
In file included from
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/swsmu/smu11/smu_v11_0.c:36:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/inc/smu_v11_0.h:61:43: warning:
‘smu11_thermal_policy’
On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 13:32 -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 08:31:30AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > Really, no ... something which produces no improvement has no value
> > at all ... we really shouldn't be wasting maintainer time with it
> > because it has a cost to merge. I
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v2_4.c:254: warning: Function parameter or
member 'job' not described in 'sdma_v2_4_ring_emit_ib'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v2_4.c:254: warning: Function parameter or
member 'flags' not described in 'sdma_v2
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 08:31:30AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> Really, no ... something which produces no improvement has no value at
> all ... we really shouldn't be wasting maintainer time with it because
> it has a cost to merge. I'm not sure we understand where the balance
> lies in value
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/uvd_v5_0.c:153: warning: Function parameter or
member 'handle' not described in 'uvd_v5_0_hw_init'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/uvd_v5_0.c:153: warning: Excess function parameter
'adev' description in 'uvd_v5_0_hw_init'
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/psp_v11_0.c:223:5: warning: no previous prototype
for ‘psp_v11_0_wait_for_bootloader’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
Cc: Alex Deucher
Cc: "Christian König"
Cc: David Airlie
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Hawking Zhang
Cc: amd-gfx@l
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 05:32:51PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 8:17 AM Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 11:51:42AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > If none of the 140 patches here fix a real bug, and there is no change
> > > to machine code then it so
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/dce_v10_0.c:237: warning: Function parameter or
member 'async' not described in 'dce_v10_0_page_flip'
Cc: Alex Deucher
Cc: "Christian König"
Cc: David Airlie
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Luben Tuikov
Cc: amd-gfx@lists.fre
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v3_0.c:1651: warning: Function parameter or
member 'ib' not described in 'sdma_v3_0_emit_copy_buffer'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v3_0.c:1651: warning: Excess function
parameter 'ring' description in 'sdma_v3_
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
>
> The C standard has nothing to do with this. We use compiler extensions
> of several kinds, for many years. Even discounting those extensions, the
> kernel is not even conforming to C due to e.g. strict aliasing. I am not
> sure what you are trying
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 11:24 PM Finn Thain wrote:
>
> These statements are not "missing" unless you presume that code written
> before the latest de facto language spec was written should somehow be
> held to that spec.
There is no "language spec" the kernel adheres to. Even if it did,
kernel co
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 08:31:30AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > Really, no ... something which produces no improvement has no value at
> > all ... we really shouldn't be wasting maintainer time with it because
> > it has a cost to merge. I'm not sure
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
Cc: Alex Deucher
Cc: "Christian König"
Cc: David Airlie
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu12/renoir_ppt.c | 4 ++--
1 file chang
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c:5008:6: warning: no previous prototype
for ‘gfx_v10_0_rlc_stop’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
Cc: Alex Deucher
Cc: "Christian König"
Cc: David Airlie
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Sumit Semwal
Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freede
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v5_2.c:367: warning: Function parameter or
member 'job' not described in 'sdma_v5_2_ring_emit_ib'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v5_2.c:367: warning: Function parameter or
member 'flags' not described in 'sdma_v5
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 9:38 PM James Bottomley
wrote:
>
> So you think a one line patch should take one minute to produce ... I
> really don't think that's grounded in reality.
No, I have not said that. Please don't put words in my mouth (again).
I have said *authoring* lines of *this* kind tak
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/jpeg_v1_0.c:219: warning: Function parameter or
member 'addr' not described in 'jpeg_v1_0_decode_ring_emit_fence'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/jpeg_v1_0.c:219: warning: Function parameter or
member 'seq' not described in
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v1_0.c:439: warning: Excess function parameter
'sw' description in 'vcn_v1_0_disable_clock_gating'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v1_0.c:566: warning: Excess function parameter
'sw' description in 'vcn_v1_0_enable_
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 1:58 AM Finn Thain wrote:
>
> What I meant was that you've used pessimism as if it was fact.
"future mistakes that it might prevent" is neither pessimism nor states a fact.
> For example, "There is no way to guess what the effect would be if the
> compiler trained program
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 12:53 AM Finn Thain wrote:
>
> I'm saying that supporting the official language spec makes more sense
> than attempting to support a multitude of divergent interpretations of the
> spec (i.e. gcc, clang, coverity etc.)
Making the kernel strictly conforming is a ship that s
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
Cc: Alex Deucher
Cc: "Christian König"
Cc: David Airlie
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Evan Quan
Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones
---
.../gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/navi10_ppt.c | 204 ---
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/powerplay/smumgr/fiji_smumgr.c: In function
‘fiji_populate_smc_boot_level’:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/powerplay/smumgr/fiji_smumgr.c:1603:6:
warning: variable ‘result’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-va
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/uvd_v7_0.c:219: warning: Function parameter or
member 'bo' not described in 'uvd_v7_0_enc_get_create_msg'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/uvd_v7_0.c:219: warning: Excess function parameter
'adev' description in 'uvd_v7_0_en
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v2_0.c:483: warning: Excess function parameter
'sw' description in 'vcn_v2_0_disable_clock_gating'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v2_0.c:644: warning: Excess function parameter
'sw' description in 'vcn_v2_0_enable_
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vega10_ih.c:377: warning: Function parameter or
member 'ih' not described in 'vega10_ih_get_wptr'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vega10_ih.c:440: warning: Function parameter or
member 'ih' not described in 'vega10_ih_decod
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c:2576:5: warning: no previous prototype
for ‘parse_ta_bin_descriptor’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
Cc: Alex Deucher
Cc: "Christian König"
Cc: David Airlie
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c:183: warning: Function parameter or
member 'handle' not described in 'acp_hw_init'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c:183: warning: Excess function
parameter 'adev' description in 'acp_hw_init'
drive
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/swsmu/smu11/vangogh_ppt.c: At top level:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/swsmu/smu11/vangogh_ppt.c:764:5: warning: no
previous prototype for ‘vangogh_set_default_dpm_tables’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
764 | int vang
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/jpeg_v2_0.c:498: warning: Function parameter or
member 'addr' not described in 'jpeg_v2_0_dec_ring_emit_fence'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/jpeg_v2_0.c:498: warning: Function parameter or
member 'seq' not described in 'j
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v3_0.c: In function ‘vcn_v3_0_start_sriov’:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v3_0.c:1242:3: warning: variable ‘direct_poll’
set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
Cc: Alex Deucher
Cc: "Christian König"
Cc: Da
Hi
Am 24.11.20 um 15:06 schrieb Christian König:
Am 24.11.20 um 14:56 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
Hi
Am 24.11.20 um 14:36 schrieb Christian König:
Am 24.11.20 um 13:15 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
[SNIP]
First I wanted to put this into drm_gem_ttm_vmap/vunmap(), but
then wondered why ttm_bo_vm
Hi
Am 24.11.20 um 15:09 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 02:56:51PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 24.11.20 um 14:36 schrieb Christian König:
Am 24.11.20 um 13:15 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
[SNIP]
First I wanted to put this into
drm_gem_ttm_vmap/vunmap(), but then wonde
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 11:27 PM Andrey Grodzovsky
wrote:
>
>
> On 11/24/20 9:49 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 12:21:20AM -0500, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
> >> Avoids NULL ptr due to kobj->sd being unset on device removal.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andrey Grodzovsky
> >> ---
Am 25.11.20 um 04:17 schrieb Luben Tuikov:
Rename "node" to "list" in struct drm_sched_job,
in order to make it consistent with what we see
being used throughout gpu_scheduler.h, for
instance in struct drm_sched_entity, as well as
the rest of DRM and the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Luben Tuikov
Re
Am 25.11.20 um 04:17 schrieb Luben Tuikov:
Rename "ring_mirror_list" to "pending_list",
to describe what something is, not what it does,
how it's used, or how the hardware implements it.
This also abstracts the actual hardware
implementation, i.e. how the low-level driver
communicates with the d
Am 25.11.20 um 04:17 schrieb Luben Tuikov:
The job timeout handler now returns status
indicating back to the DRM layer whether the job
was successfully cancelled or whether more time
should be given to the job to complete.
Signed-off-by: Luben Tuikov
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_job.
Am 25.11.20 um 04:17 schrieb Luben Tuikov:
The job done callback is called from various
places, in two ways: in job done role, and
as a fence callback role.
Essentialize the callback to an atom
function to just complete the job,
and into a second function as a prototype
of fence callback which c
Am 25.11.20 um 04:17 schrieb Luben Tuikov:
Introduce a macro DRM_THREAD_NAME_LEN
and use that to define ring name size,
instead of hardcoding it to 16.
Signed-off-by: Luben Tuikov
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h | 2 +-
include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h | 2 ++
2 files c
Am 25.11.20 um 04:17 schrieb Luben Tuikov:
Add a "done" list to which all completed jobs are added
to be freed. The drm_sched_job_done() callback is the
producer of jobs to this list.
Add a "done" thread which consumes from the done list
and frees up jobs. Now, the main scheduler thread only
pus
Am 25.11.20 um 09:37 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
Hi
Am 24.11.20 um 15:09 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 02:56:51PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 24.11.20 um 14:36 schrieb Christian König:
Am 24.11.20 um 13:15 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
[SNIP]
First I wanted to put th
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 11:13:13AM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> Am 25.11.20 um 09:37 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
> > Hi
> >
> > Am 24.11.20 um 15:09 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 02:56:51PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > Am 24.11.20 um 14:36 sc
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 05:44:07PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> Am 24.11.20 um 17:22 schrieb Andrey Grodzovsky:
> >
> > On 11/24/20 2:41 AM, Christian König wrote:
> > > Am 23.11.20 um 22:08 schrieb Andrey Grodzovsky:
> > > >
> > > > On 11/23/20 3:41 PM, Christian König wrote:
> > > > > Am 23.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 10:51:57AM -0500, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
>
> On 11/24/20 9:53 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 12:21:18AM -0500, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
> > > Some of the stuff in amdgpu_device_fini such as HW interrupts
> > > disable and pending fences finilization
Am 25.11.20 um 11:36 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 11:13:13AM +0100, Christian König wrote:
Am 25.11.20 um 09:37 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
Hi
Am 24.11.20 um 15:09 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 02:56:51PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 24.11.20 um 14
On 25/11/2020 03:17, Luben Tuikov wrote:
The job timeout handler now returns status
indicating back to the DRM layer whether the job
was successfully cancelled or whether more time
should be given to the job to complete.
I'm not sure I understand in what circumstances you would want to give
th
On 25/11/2020 03:17, Luben Tuikov wrote:
Add a "done" list to which all completed jobs are added
to be freed. The drm_sched_job_done() callback is the
producer of jobs to this list.
Add a "done" thread which consumes from the done list
and frees up jobs. Now, the main scheduler thread only
pushe
Am Mittwoch, den 25.11.2020, 11:04 + schrieb Steven Price:
> On 25/11/2020 03:17, Luben Tuikov wrote:
> > The job timeout handler now returns status
> > indicating back to the DRM layer whether the job
> > was successfully cancelled or whether more time
> > should be given to the job to complet
On 25/11/2020 11:15, Lucas Stach wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 25.11.2020, 11:04 + schrieb Steven Price:
On 25/11/2020 03:17, Luben Tuikov wrote:
The job timeout handler now returns status
indicating back to the DRM layer whether the job
was successfully cancelled or whether more time
should be g
Hi
Am 25.11.20 um 11:36 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 11:13:13AM +0100, Christian König wrote:
Am 25.11.20 um 09:37 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
Hi
Am 24.11.20 um 15:09 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 02:56:51PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 24.11.20 u
Am Mittwoch, den 25.11.2020, 11:22 + schrieb Steven Price:
> On 25/11/2020 11:15, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 25.11.2020, 11:04 + schrieb Steven Price:
> > > On 25/11/2020 03:17, Luben Tuikov wrote:
> > > > The job timeout handler now returns status
> > > > indicating back to th
Am 25.11.20 um 12:04 schrieb Steven Price:
On 25/11/2020 03:17, Luben Tuikov wrote:
The job timeout handler now returns status
indicating back to the DRM layer whether the job
was successfully cancelled or whether more time
should be given to the job to complete.
I'm not sure I understand in w
Am 25.11.20 um 11:40 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 05:44:07PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
Am 24.11.20 um 17:22 schrieb Andrey Grodzovsky:
On 11/24/20 2:41 AM, Christian König wrote:
Am 23.11.20 um 22:08 schrieb Andrey Grodzovsky:
On 11/23/20 3:41 PM, Christian König wrote:
From: Likun Gao
4MB reserved VRAM size which used for page tables was not enough for
some condition, increase it to 8MB to reduce page table contention.
Signed-off-by: Likun Gao
Change-Id: Ibbc0c14a75bd0e57d77e30b7140a144f4030114a
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h | 2 +-
1 file chang
[AMD Public Use]
Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang
Regards,
Hawking
-Original Message-
From: Gao, Likun
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2020 21:12
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Zhang, Hawking ; Gao, Likun
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: increase reserved VRAM size to 8MB
From: Likun Gao
Am 25.11.20 um 14:12 schrieb Likun Gao:
From: Likun Gao
4MB reserved VRAM size which used for page tables was not enough for
some condition, increase it to 8MB to reduce page table contention.
What's the use case here? 8MB is already pretty extensive, I don't want
to run into problems with A
[AMD Public Use]
/* Reserve 4MB VRAM for page tables */
This comment needs to correct to 8MB as well. With this addressed, the patch:
Reviewed-by: Guchun Chen
Regards,
Guchun
-Original Message-
From: amd-gfx On Behalf Of Likun Gao
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2020 9:12 PM
To: amd-gf
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 10:39 PM James Bottomley
wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-11-23 at 19:56 +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 4:58 PM James Bottomley
> > wrote:
...
> > But if we do the math, for an author, at even 1 minute per line
> > change and assuming nothing can be automate
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 07:58:06AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-11-23 at 15:19 +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 11:36 PM James Bottomley
> > wrote:
> > > It's not about the risk of the changes it's about the cost of
> > > implementing them. Even if you discou
Acked-by: Alex Deucher
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 1:45 AM Marek Olšák wrote:
>
> Please review. This fixes an LDS hang that occurs with NGG, but may occur
> with other shader stages too.
>
> Thanks,
> Marek
>
> ___
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx@lists.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 6:38 AM Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>
> Using struct drm_device.pdev is deprecated. Convert amdgpu to struct
> drm_device.dev. No functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann
> Cc: Alex Deucher
> Cc: Christian König
There are a few unrelated whitespace changes.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 6:39 AM Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>
> Using struct drm_device.pdev is deprecated. Convert radeon to struct
> drm_device.dev. No functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann
> Cc: Alex Deucher
> Cc: Christian König
There are a few unrelated whitespace changes.
Fixed warning: no previous prototype.
Signed-off-by: James Zhu
Reported-by: kernel test robot
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v3_0.c | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v3_0.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v3_0.c
From: Jiange Zhao
In Virtualization case, when one VF is sending too many
FLR requests, hypervisor would stop responding to this
VF's request for a long period of time. This is called
event guard. During this period of cooling time, guest
driver should wait instead of doing other things. After
th
Am 25.11.20 um 15:18 schrieb Colin King:
From: Colin Ian King
An incorrect sizeof() is being used, sizeof((*data)->bps_bo) is not
correct, it should be sizeof(*(*data)->bps_bo). It just so happens
to work because the sizes are the same. Fix it.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Sizeof not portable (SIZE
From: Colin Ian King
An incorrect sizeof() is being used, sizeof((*data)->bps_bo) is not
correct, it should be sizeof(*(*data)->bps_bo). It just so happens
to work because the sizes are the same. Fix it.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Sizeof not portable (SIZEOF_MISMATCH)")
Fixes: 5278a159cf35 ("drm/am
Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das
On 11/25/20 3:09 PM, James Zhu wrote:
Fixed warning: no previous prototype.
Signed-off-by: James Zhu
Reported-by: kernel test robot
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v3_0.c | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gp
Reorder the code to fix checking if blitting is available.
Signed-off-by: Christian König
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c | 54 +
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/rade
[AMD Public Use]
Reviewed-by: Guchun Chen
Regards,
Guchun
-Original Message-
From: Colin King
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2020 10:18 PM
To: Deucher, Alexander ; Koenig, Christian
; David Airlie ; Daniel Vetter
; Zhou1, Tao ; Chen, Guchun
; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org;
dri-de..
Hi Dave, Daniel,
Fixes for 5.10.
The following changes since commit 6600f9d52213b5c3455481b5c9e61cf5e305c0e6:
Merge tag 'drm-intel-fixes-2020-11-19' of
git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-intel into drm-fixes (2020-11-20 11:21:54
+1000)
are available in the Git repository at:
git://peo
GPU reset is handled via SMU similar to previous APUs.
Acked-by: Evan Quan
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/vangogh_ppt.c | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/vangogh_ppt.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/
Vangogh will use mode2 reset, so plumb it through the nv
soc driver.
Acked-by: Evan Quan
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/nv.c | 14 --
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/nv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdg
We need to save and restore PCI config space.
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/nv.c | 34 -
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/nv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/nv.c
index 221a29cdc0aa
Enable GPU reset when we encounter a hang.
Acked-by: Evan Quan
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
index 79dd85f71f
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 04:24:27 -0800 Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> I even agree that most of the churn comes from
>
> case 0:
> ++x;
> default:
> break;
And just to spell it out,
case ENUM_VALUE1:
bla();
break;
case ENUM_VALUE2:
bla();
default:
break;
is a fairly i
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 12:38:01PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 25.11.20 um 11:36 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 11:13:13AM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> > > Am 25.11.20 um 09:37 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > Am 24.11.20 um 15:09 schrie
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 01:57:40PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> Am 25.11.20 um 11:40 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 05:44:07PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> > > Am 24.11.20 um 17:22 schrieb Andrey Grodzovsky:
> > > > On 11/24/20 2:41 AM, Christian König wrote:
> > > > > Am
On 2020-11-25 04:47, Christian König wrote:
> Am 25.11.20 um 04:17 schrieb Luben Tuikov:
>> Rename "ring_mirror_list" to "pending_list",
>> to describe what something is, not what it does,
>> how it's used, or how the hardware implements it.
>>
>> This also abstracts the actual hardware
>> implemen
Hi Dave, Daniel,
More updates for 5.11.
The following changes since commit 178631700f9dc40df754acbe766b55753ddcbfec:
drm/amd/pm: fix spelling mistakes in dev_warn messages (2020-11-17 14:07:26
-0500)
are available in the Git repository at:
git://people.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux tags/am
On 2020-11-25 04:50, Christian König wrote:
> Am 25.11.20 um 04:17 schrieb Luben Tuikov:
>> The job timeout handler now returns status
>> indicating back to the DRM layer whether the job
>> was successfully cancelled or whether more time
>> should be given to the job to complete.
>>
>> Signed-off-b
On 2020-11-25 1:57 p.m., Christian König wrote:
Well thinking more about this, it seems to be a another really good
argument why mapping pages from DMA-bufs into application address space
directly is a very bad idea :)
Apologies for going off on a tangent here...
Since allowing userspace mm
On 2020-11-25 04:55, Christian König wrote:
> Am 25.11.20 um 04:17 schrieb Luben Tuikov:
>> Introduce a macro DRM_THREAD_NAME_LEN
>> and use that to define ring name size,
>> instead of hardcoding it to 16.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luben Tuikov
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h | 2
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 5:56 PM Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> On 2020-11-25 1:57 p.m., Christian König wrote:
> >
> > Well thinking more about this, it seems to be a another really good
> > argument why mapping pages from DMA-bufs into application address space
> > directly is a very bad idea :)
>
> Ap
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
