> >>solved. The same 1010 box shows no noise in windows. On
> recordings it
> >>sounds like a ground hum (again, not present on the same box in
> MS).
> >
> >
> > I thought that I fixed this problem in 1.0.1. It seems not :-( Can
> you
> > make a report in our bug-tracking system?
>
> Jarosl
Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, kevin ernste wrote:
--- Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyone using M-Audio Delta 1010?
Does it work ok with ALSA? Can you change sampling rates, etc?
Hi Florin -
I am running Planet with ALSA 1.0.1. (Fernando's cvs build).
Our studio has
>
> I thought that I fixed this problem in 1.0.1. It seems not :-( Can
> you
> make a report in our bug-tracking system?
Let me first double check my versions of ALSA on that machine. If it
is 1.0.1 (up to date with Planet as I assumed) then I'll post it in the
bug-tracking system.
> > 1. Bass
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, kevin ernste wrote:
>
> --- Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Anyone using M-Audio Delta 1010?
> >
> > Does it work ok with ALSA? Can you change sampling rates, etc?
>
> Hi Florin -
>
> I am running Planet with ALSA 1.0.1. (Fernando's cvs build).
>
> Our studio
On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 21:06, kevin ernste wrote:
> > It seems to me that the Multiface is more extensible than the Delta
> > 1010. And of course it has more ways to connect to other devices. But
> > then it's a lot more expensive ($920 vs. $600).
>
> I think your instinct is right on. Do you see
--- Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 13:37, kevin ernste wrote:
>
> > Other than the concerns I listed, I am very happy with the 1010 in
> > linux. The only box I have liked as much is the HDSP mentioned
> above,
> > but it's more expensive and doesn't sound as go
> It seems to me that the Multiface is more extensible than the Delta
> 1010. And of course it has more ways to connect to other devices. But
> then it's a lot more expensive ($920 vs. $600).
I think your instinct is right on. Do you see yourself wanting to use
this rig remotely? The cardbus ad
On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 13:37, kevin ernste wrote:
> Other than the concerns I listed, I am very happy with the 1010 in
> linux. The only box I have liked as much is the HDSP mentioned above,
> but it's more expensive and doesn't sound as good to my humble ear.
Interesting!
Most of the other op
On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 13:37, kevin ernste wrote:
> Now that the HDSP driver is stable (and the mixer is working so well!)
> I'd say it's a toss up between these two boxes depending on you
> needs/finances (this is much discussed elsewhere on this list).
It seems to me that the Multiface is more e
--- Bill Unruh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > especially with JACK and the fact that m-audio cards tend to be
> > brainlessly easy to set up in linux. Other than the issues I list
>
> Having just battled with the MAudio Transit for the past month, your
> characterisation of MAudio is not correct
> especially with JACK and the fact that m-audio cards tend to be
> brainlessly easy to set up in linux. Other than the issues I list
Having just battled with the MAudio Transit for the past month, your
characterisation of MAudio is not correct. Plus the fact that Maudio
tends to be very closed m
> That said, I see no reason why two cards couldn't be used together,
With proper clocking to ensure they are synced
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the
--- Doug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> Are you using the 2 1010's together?
Yes, but not the way you are planning. We have two machines in the
same studio which are often used in conjunction (two different OS's).
Both boxes talk digitally to one another via S/PDIF, and then they ar
Hi Kevin,
Are you using the 2 1010's together? I am planning on getting a second
one to add 16 track capability. Right now I use about 13 mic inputs for
our live band recording, and do things like sub'ing the 3 tom mics
together on the board, for example, to get down to 8 tracks.
I've read
--- Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone using M-Audio Delta 1010?
>
> Does it work ok with ALSA? Can you change sampling rates, etc?
Hi Florin -
I am running Planet with ALSA 1.0.1. (Fernando's cvs build).
Our studio has two 1010's. Sampling rate switching works great, but I
con
Actually both:
2.4.23 w/ low latency patches applied and 2.6.1 on Slackware 9.1. I
haven't run 2.6.1 extensively, just enough to confirm everything works,
and await good low latency performance.
moron wrote:
On February 4, 2004 10:01 pm, Doug wrote:
Using a Delta 1010LT here, works great. Ins
On February 4, 2004 10:01 pm, Doug wrote:
> Using a Delta 1010LT here, works great. Instead of the generic
> alsamixer, build the envy24control tool in the alsa-tools package fora
> gtk mixer / router / control interface with bar graph displays for every
> input / output and digital mix bus. Ha
Using a Delta 1010LT here, works great. Instead of the generic
alsamixer, build the envy24control tool in the alsa-tools package fora
gtk mixer / router / control interface with bar graph displays for every
input / output and digital mix bus. Has advanced s/pdif control,
clock rate / source
Anyone using M-Audio Delta 1010?
Does it work ok with ALSA? Can you change sampling rates, etc?
Can you control the channels with the provided utility?
What's in the Windows drivers that's missing in ALSA?
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
19 matches
Mail list logo
