Mailing lists matching lists.llvm.org
cfe-commits lists.llvm.orglldb-commits lists.llvm.org
llvm-branch-commits lists.llvm.org
llvm-bugs lists.llvm.org
Re: Builder llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-scei-ps4-windows10pro-fast is back to normal
anova via llvm-commits < > llvm-comm...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Builder >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-scei-ps4-windows10pro-fast >> is back to normal. >> Sorry for the noise. >> >> Thanks >&
Re: [libcxx] r271060 - Tolerate incorrect return type for 'isinf' and 'isnan' in tests.
On 28 May 2016 12:58 a.m., "Eric Fiselier via cfe-commits" < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I think that would be a possibility. However IMO such a change has little value. Unlike other uses of `_LIBCPP_PREFERRED_OVERLOAD`, which fix const correctness issue, I don&#
Re: [libcxx] r254050 - Silence a -Wmissing-braces warning in the tests; mbstate_t is defined differently on different C libraries.
Is {} not portable in some way? On Nov 25, 2015 5:58 AM, "Joerg Sonnenberger via cfe-commits" < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 05:38:23PM -0800, David Blaikie via cfe-commits > wrote: > > Could this initialization just be written as
Re: r254143 - Fix for merging decls in pragma weak
Please fix or revert this patch. On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 09:34:31AM -, Alexander Musman via cfe-commits > wrote: > > Author: amusman > > Date: Thu Nov 26 03:34:
Re: [cfe-users] [llvm-dev] Error: ISO C++17 does not allow 'register' storage class specifier [-Wregister], when building Boost 1.69.0
This seems a better question for cfe-dev or cfe-users ~Craig On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 12:23 PM Osman Zakir via llvm-dev < llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > When trying to build Boost using LLVM, I had this error: > " > error: ISO C++17 does not allow 'register
Re: [cfe-users] Why re-compile clang with clang?
via cfe-users < > cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I noticed here - >> https://clang.llvm.org/docs/LibASTMatchersTutorial.html#step-0-obtaining-clang >> that >> it is recommended to recompile clang after building it for the first time >&g
Re: [Lldb-commits] Builder llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-scei-ps4-windows10pro-fast is back to normal
anova via llvm-commits < > llvm-comm...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Builder >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-scei-ps4-windows10pro-fast >> is back to normal. >> Sorry for the noise. >> >> Thanks >&
[llvm-bugs] [Bug 36527] New: test_*int*_t_dwarf failing on FreeBSD
Priority: P Component: All Bugs Assignee: lldb-...@lists.llvm.org Reporter: ema...@freebsd.org CC: llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org test_{,u}int{8,16,32,64}_t_dwarf tests are failing on FreeBSD. I intend to enable tests on the FreeBSD buildbot worker soon
Re: [llvm-bugs] Why utf convertion functions requires output buffer to be empty?
You can probably relax it if you like. On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Xpol Wan via llvm-bugs < llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > The function convertUTF16ToUTF8String and convertUTF8ToUTF16String defined > in lib/Support/ConvertUTFWrapper.cpp has an assertion that out buf
Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Tim Northover via llvm-dev < llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 31 May 2016 at 12:31, Renato Golin via cfe-dev > wrote: > > What do people think? Any issue not covered that we should? > > I'm in favour of the move. Git-svn just
Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [5.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 4 tagged
-testers < release-test...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello testers, > > 5.0.0-rc4 was just tagged. > > There were very few changes after rc3, and if nothing unexpected comes > up, this is what the final release will look like. > > Please test and let me know if there are
Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [5.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 5 tagged
ase-test...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello again, > > 5.0.0-rc5 was just tagged. > > I had hoped rc4 would be the last one, but I think we needed the fix > for PR34381. > > Please do a quick test; if there are no new issues, this will become > 'fina
[lldb-dev] [Bug 36527] New: test_*int*_t_dwarf failing on FreeBSD
Priority: P Component: All Bugs Assignee: lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org Reporter: ema...@freebsd.org CC: llvm-b...@lists.llvm.org test_{,u}int{8,16,32,64}_t_dwarf tests are failing on FreeBSD. I intend to enable tests on the FreeBSD buildbot worker soon
Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [7.0.0 Release] rc1 has been tagged
SLES11 rc1 build failed, opened PR38589. Uploaded SLES12 rc1: 39ba1263db364999357fae8c6f2829b8fce7cfdd clang+llvm-7.0.0-rc1-x86_64-linux-sles12.3.tar.xz On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 6:38 AM Hans Wennborg via Release-testers < release-test...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Dear testers, > >
Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] 8.0.1-final has been tagged
lang+llvm-8.0.1-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 10:21 PM Tom Stellard via Release-testers < release-test...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > The 8.0.1 final release has been tagged. Testers please upload
Re: [lldb-dev] LLVM 9.0.1-rc3 has been tagged
bout the delay. Diana On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 at 07:34, Tom Stellard via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I've just tagged LLVM 9.0.1-rc3. Testers can begin testing and uploading > binaries. This will be the last release candidate unless there is a > m
Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] December LLVM bay-area social is this Thursday!
< llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > We'll be at Tied House as usual, starting on Thursday the 5th at 7pm! > > If you can, help us plan and RSVP here: > https://www.meetup.com/LLVM-Bay-Area-Social/events/kncsjlyzqbhb > > See everyone there! > __
Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 11.0.1-rc1 has been tagged
v7a-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz Cheers, Diana On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 01:01, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer via cfe-dev < cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Thursday, November 26, 2020 08:21 CET, Tom Stellard via Release-testers > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I've
Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 11.0.1-final has been tagged
Hi, I finished testing llvm-11.0.1 on Power PC 64-bit Little Endian for - Ubuntu 18.04 - Red Hat 7.4 I have uploaded the binaries from IBM. The sha1 files are attached. Thanks, Ahsan Saghir. On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 22:21, Tom Stellard via Release-testers < release-test...@lists.llvm.org>
Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] 13.0.0-rc2 has been tagged
Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 7:20 AM Tom Stellard via Release-testers < release-test...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I've tagged the 13.0.0-rc2 release. Testers can begin testing and > uploading > binaries. > > 13.0.0-rc3 is scheduled to be released on Sep. 7, so we
Re: 3.8 Merge Request: r259776
>> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 09:40:44AM -0700, Richard Smith wrote: >> It's larger than I'd like for a merge onto the branch, but yes, it looks OK. >> >> On 7 Jun 2016 9:20 a.m., "Tom Stellard via cfe-commits" < >> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrot
Re: [lldb-dev] Patch for addressing format warnings on 32-bit
5 at 12:32 PM, William Dillon via lldb-dev > mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > Message: 1 > > Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 21:15:53 +0100 > > From: Joerg Sonnenberger via lldb-dev > <mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>> > > To: lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org &
Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [llvm-foundation] Sequential ID Git hook
I could see wanting to compare data from master and a release branch. If that means sequential IDs need to work across branches, then we're back to needing a fancier solution than 'rev-list –count'. --paulr From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-boun...@lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of
Re: [lldb-dev] Issue: print std unique pointer
her STL things won't work as well. We are tuned for a specific STL On Feb 27, 2018, at 2:12 PM, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev <mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: This probably isn't arch-dependent. More likely you just have a different version of libstdc++. Can you share how
Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [9.0.0 Release] The release branch is open; trunk is now 10.0.0
hts on lldb-vscode tests running forever on Linux? > > From: lldb-dev On Behalf Of Brian Cain via > lldb-dev > Sent: Monday, July 22, 2019 10:44 PM > To: Hans Wennborg > Cc: llvm-dev ; Release-testers > ; clangd-...@lists.llvm.org; openmp-dev > (openmp-...@lis
Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] [11.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 6 is here
Hi! Can someone tell me what configure / build flags do you use when building these packages (.tar.xz)? I guess there should be a script, but is it available somewhere? Thanks in advance, - Ilia On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:28 AM Diana Picus via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
Re: [lldb-dev] top-of-tree build failure when using configure on Linux?
o:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> > wrote: I haven't seen that one myself. Are you still seeing it? Is it possible the buildbot's commands are possibly using older/stale object files? Is distcc/ccache involved? Does the build force a clean build? If not, does the issue go awa
[PATCH] D67420: [analyzer] NFC: Separate PathDiagnosticConsumer options from AnalyzerOptions.
NoQ added a comment. @vsavchenko and others just joining: The backstory and the overall plan are in this thread: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-August/063092.html. Continued at http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-September/063229.html. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https
Re: [cfe-users] Snapshot Updates
__ > cfe-users mailing list > cfe-users@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-users > ___ cfe-users mailing list cfe-users@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-users
[llvm-announce] New mailing list is up!
All, The LLVM mailing lists are up and running. If you encounter any issues, please email me directly. As a reminder, llvmdev is now llvm-...@lists.llvm.org and llvmbugs is llvm-b...@lists.llvm.org Please update your contacts/filters. All llvm.org <http://llvm.org/> services should b
[lldb-dev] [Bug 33452] New: [LLDB][MIPS] TestNoreturnUnwind.py Fail
Priority: P Component: All Bugs Assignee: lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org Reporter: nitesh.j...@imgtec.com CC: llvm-b...@lists.llvm.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug
RE: [Patch][OpenCL] Custom atomic Builtin check ignores address space of a non-atomic pointer
Hi Pekka, Re-attaching as a full patch again as something went wrong earlier with the diff wrapping in the email. Thanks, Anastasia -Original Message- From: cfe-commits [mailto:cfe-commits-boun...@lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Anastasia Stulova via cfe-commits Sent: 07 December 2015 17
Re: [Patch][OpenCL] Custom atomic Builtin check ignores address space of a non-atomic pointer
...@lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Anastasia Stulova via cfe-commits Sent: 07 December 2015 17:25 To: 'Pekka Jääskeläinen'; cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org Subject: RE: [Patch][OpenCL] Custom atomic Builtin check ignores address space of a non-atomic pointer Could someone jump in, please! I have ma
Re: r326156 - [analyzer] Logging test typo quickfix.
should be fine now. > On Feb 27, 2018, at 12:04 AM, Yvan Roux wrote: > > Hi George, > > On 27 February 2018 at 02:31, George Karpenkov via cfe-commits > mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> Author: george.karpenkov >> Date: Mon Feb 26 17:31:06 201
Re: [PATCH] D55076: [analyzer] RetainCountChecker: recognize that OSObject can be created directly using an operator "new"
Thanks and sorry about the trouble. I’ll recommit with size_t. > On Nov 30, 2018, at 10:56 AM, Aaron Ballman wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 9:37 AM Artem Dergachev via Phabricator via > cfe-commits mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>> > wrote: >> &
Re: clang-format: Fix deref treated as binary op in throw
Thx. Submitted as r308185. On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 4:28 PM Erik Uhlmann wrote: > I don’t have commit access, so I’d need you to check it in. Thanks for > your help! > > > > *From: *Manuel Klimek > *Date: *Monday, July 17, 2017 at 03:31 > *To: *Erik Uhlmann , &qu
Re: [PATCH] D29877: Warn about unused static file scope function template declarations.
On 11/04/17 22:25, Richard Smith wrote: On 11 April 2017 at 08:35, Marshall Clow via Phabricator via cfe-commits <mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: mclow.lists added a comment. Complete reproducer: // Tested with with: clang++ -std=c++14 -Wunused
Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [3.9 Release] 'final' has been tagged
rom: Release-testers [release-testers-boun...@lists.llvm.org] on behalf of Hans Wennborg via Release-testers [release-test...@lists.llvm.org] Sent: 01 September 2016 00:49 To: Release-testers Cc: llvm-dev; cfe-dev; openmp-dev (openmp-...@lists.llvm.org); LLDB Dev Subject: [Release-testers] [3.9 Relea
Re: [lldb-dev] Recent Linux test failures
Thank you Paul. Could you paste the output of the "check-lldb" command? The LogTest.cpp thing looks like a gcc issue I ran into earlier, I'll have that fixed shortly. cheers, pl On 28 February 2017 at 17:39, Robinson, Paul via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: &
Re: [lldb-dev] Forcing lldb to refresh process state
en a need for this. > >> > >> What commands are you planning to send? Or equivalently, how much > state are you expecting to change? > >> > >> Jim > >> > >>> On Aug 18, 2017, at 4:36 PM, Vadim Chugunov via lldb-dev < > lldb-d
Re: [lldb-dev] purpose of ProcessGDBRemote::m_flags
Sorry, I was unclear – I mean existing recently added plugin “Architecture”. And “dynamic” configuration is not necessary retrieved from gdb-server. From: Greg Clayton [mailto:clayb...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, 3 November, 2017 9:37 PM To: Tatyana Krasnukha Cc: lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org Subject
Re: [lldb-dev] purpose of ProcessGDBRemote::m_flags
clayb...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, 3 November, 2017 9:37 PM > To: Tatyana Krasnukha > Cc: lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org > Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] purpose of ProcessGDBRemote::m_flags > > > > If this isn't used, then this should be removed. Anything dynamic settings > that a
Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 tagged
an8.tar.xz)= e6a281885d2f0fbc4e00bdc34803f67bb756f19badef3f24ed3738b2244c57cc Thanks, Simon From: Release-testers [release-testers-boun...@lists.llvm.org] on behalf of Hans Wennborg via Release-testers [release-test...@lists.llvm.org] Sent: Wednesday,
Re: [lldb-dev] [Openmp-dev] GitHub Migration Starting Now
I'm unable to push. I filed https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43761 What's the github meta bug bug # ? On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 12:57 PM Tom Stellard via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 10/22/2019 09:08 AM, Tom Stellard via Openmp-dev wrote: > >
Re: [clang] c90e198 - Fix parsing of enum-base to follow C++11 rules.
> On May 20, 2020, at 5:53 PM, Richard Smith wrote: > > On Wed, 20 May 2020 at 16:30, Akira Hatanaka via cfe-commits > mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > Hi Richard, > > It looks like this patch will reject the following code, which used to > com
Re: [PATCH] D12134: Improve debug info for implicitly captured vars in lambdas
e more >> convenient for user >> to see the diagnostic on the first use of the variable >> rather than >> on '=' or '&' symbol. >> >> >> Why the difference between the diagnost
RE: [Patch][OpenCL] Custom atomic Builtin check ignores address space of a non-atomic pointer
; cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org Cc: nd Subject: Re: [Patch][OpenCL] Custom atomic Builtin check ignores address space of a non-atomic pointer Hi Anastasia, Still LGTM. Pekka On 16.12.2015 16:42, Anastasia Stulova wrote: > Hi Pekka, > > Re-attaching as a full patch again as something went wron
Re: r365030 - Make a buildbot using a buggy gcc happy
Thank you so much! Sorry for the inconvencience, I'll be that much more careful next time :) On Mon, 8 Jul 2019, 21:42 Richard Smith, wrote: > I'll commit the change below once my testing finishes :) > > On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 at 12:40, Kristóf Umann via cfe-commits < > c
Re: [cfe-users] libclang: Spelling on typedefs lacks namespaces
lps. -Adam On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Michael via cfe-users mailto:cfe-users@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: Nobody? Wrong list? Any insight in this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Michael On 08/30/2016 07:00 PM, Michael via cfe-users wrote: Hi Ho
Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r280755 - Reorder FreeBSD Host.cpp #includes to fix build
e already included. Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 at 12:05 AM From: "Dimitry Andric via lldb-commits" To: "Zachary Turner" Cc: lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r280755 - Reorder FreeBSD Host.cpp #includes to fix build In general, and
Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [3.8 Release] RC2 has been tagged
Fedora looks OK, openSUSE not so much, check gets stuck at 90% on x64 but test suite passes OK, on x86 build succeeds but test suite fails saying 'import spec' no module found. On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Daniel Sanders via Release-testers < release-test...@lists.llvm.org>
Re: [lldb-dev] Setting shared library search paths and core files
my_extract/lib/..., my_extract/opt/..., my_extract/usr/..., etc). >>> >>> With gdb, I'd do something like: >>> >>> set sysroot . >>> file opt/my_cool_program >>> core my_broken_coredump >>> >>> then everything would work.
[libcxx] r244772 - Merging r244003:
ines Update references to lists.llvm.org Modified: libcxx/branches/release_37/ (props changed) libcxx/branches/release_37/CMakeLists.txt libcxx/branches/release_37/www/atomic_design.html libcxx/bran
Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues [UPDATED]
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 17:00, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev < llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 04/21/2020 03:36 PM, Richard Smith via llvm-dev wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 11:04, Philip Reames via cfe-dev < > cfe-...@lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-...@lists.llvm.org>
Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues [UPDATED]
; > On 04/21/2020 03:36 PM, Richard Smith via llvm-dev wrote: >> >> On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 11:04, Philip Reames via cfe-dev >> >> mailto:cfe-...@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> >> >> +1 to James's take >> >> >> >&g
Re: clang extra refactor tweaks link patch
___ > cfe-commits mailing list > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
[PATCH] D27621: [clang-tidy] check to find declarations declaring more than one name
firolino added a comment. Unfortunately, I am not able to make getUserWrittenType easier right now. TypeLoc does not give me the desired range. See also: - http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2013-March/028467.html - http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2010-April/008664.html - https
Re: [PATCH] trivial documentation fix regarding Obj-C ARC objc_arc_weak_reference_unavailable
gt;Cheers, > >Sean >___ >cfe-commits mailing list >cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org >http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits objc_arc_weak_unavailable-typo.patch Description: Binary data ___
Re: [PATCH] Use the correct ObjC++ personality
> > -- > Jonathan > ___ > cfe-commits mailing list > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
[PATCH] D30015: Add arch-specific directory to search path
pirama added a reviewer: rnk. pirama added a subscriber: rnk. pirama added a comment. @rnk: This patch was to address discussion in http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/openmp-dev/2017-February/001659.html but now also addresses http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2017-January/052512.html. Can
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 1130
P -Original Message- From: Sent: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 06:33:27 -0700 To: 7578703...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_1130?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or unsubsc
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 205, Issue 1719
STOP -Original Message- From: Sent: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 16:01:19 -0700 To: 7578703...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_205=2C_Issue_1719?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 205, Issue 1727
STOP -Original Message- From: Sent: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 17:05:11 -0700 To: 7578703...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_205=2C_Issue_1727?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 205, Issue 1750
STOP -Original Message- From: Sent: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 08:29:50 -0700 To: 7578703...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_205=2C_Issue_1750?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2065
7726 -Original Message- From: Sent: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 17:58:28 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2065?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2064
7726 -Original Message- From: Sent: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 17:55:57 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2064?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2063
7726 -Original Message- From: Sent: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:58:17 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2063?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2066
7726 -Original Message- From: Sent: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 18:25:39 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2066?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2067
7762 -Original Message- From: Sent: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 18:26:46 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2067?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2068
7762 -Original Message- From: Sent: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 19:28:06 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2068?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2069
7762 -Original Message- From: Sent: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 19:33:16 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2069?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2070
7762 -Original Message- From: Sent: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 20:21:39 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2070?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2071
7762 -Original Message- From: Sent: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 20:46:37 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2071?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2072
7762 -Original Message- From: Sent: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 20:56:04 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2072?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2073
7762 -Original Message- From: Sent: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 21:20:44 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2073?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2074
7762 -Original Message- From: Sent: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 22:11:52 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2074?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2076
7762 -Original Message- From: Sent: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 22:52:07 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2076?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2077
7762 -Original Message- From: Sent: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 22:52:38 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2077?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2079
7762 -Original Message- From: Sent: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 23:38:25 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2079?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2080
7762 -Original Message- From: Sent: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:01:46 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2080?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2081
7762 -Original Message- From: Sent: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:02:38 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2081?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2082
7762 -Original Message- From: Sent: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:13:59 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2082?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2084
7762 -Original Message- From: Sent: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:44:38 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2084?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2085
7762 -Original Message- From: Sent: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 01:02:35 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2085?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2087
7762 -Original Message- From: Sent: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 02:06:41 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2087?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2088
7762 -Original Message- From: Sent: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 02:13:57 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2088?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2090
7762 -Original Message- From: Sent: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 02:32:24 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2090?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2091
7762 -Original Message- From: Sent: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 02:38:45 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2091?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2092
7762 -Original Message- From: Sent: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 02:44:17 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2092?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2093
7762 -Original Message- From: Sent: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 02:49:34 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2093?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2094
7762 -Original Message- From: Sent: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 02:51:01 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2094?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2095
7762 -Original Message- From: Sent: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 02:53:22 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2095?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2097
7762 -Original Message- From: Sent: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 02:57:51 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2097?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2098
7762 -Original Message- From: Sent: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 03:04:49 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2098?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2099
7762 -Original Message- From: Sent: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 03:12:00 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2099?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2100
7762 -Original Message- From: Sent: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 03:18:22 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2100?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2101
7762 -Original Message- From: Sent: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 03:20:33 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2101?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2103
7762 -Original Message- From: Sent: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 04:20:24 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2103?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2070
STOP -Original Message- From: Sent: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 20:21:39 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2070?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
RE: cfe-commits Digest, Vol 206, Issue 2071
STOP -Original Message- From: Sent: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 20:46:37 -0700 To: 5103850...@txt.att.net Subject: =?utf-8?q?cfe-commits_Digest=2C_Vol_206=2C_Issue_2071?= >Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > >To subscribe or uns
