On 28 May 2016 12:58 a.m., "Eric Fiselier via cfe-commits" < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I think that would be a possibility. However IMO such a change has little value. Unlike other uses of `_LIBCPP_PREFERRED_OVERLOAD`, which fix const correctness issue, I don't think the int vs bool return type distinction as that important. Perhaps I"m just being ignorant?
I don't think it's likely to be particularly important, but it seems pretty easy for us to fix with the techniques we're using elsewhere. > /Eric > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
