https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78657
--- Comment #5 from Joseph Quinsey ---
More similar or duplicate reports:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63612
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43027
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37267
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78657
Joseph Quinsey changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78657
--- Comment #3 from Joseph Quinsey ---
Similar or duplicate reports:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70811,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63326,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60875,
https://gcc.gnu.org/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78657
--- Comment #2 from Joseph Quinsey ---
The code
int foo =
#pragma GCC diagnostic push
42;
gives exactly the same error messages. So this report is not about _Pragma per
se, but about #pragma.
But I cannot see where or if the standard
ty: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jquinsey at entrenet dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The following two-line source file test.c:
#define FOO _Pragma("GCC diagnostic push") 42
int foo = FOO;
g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49915
Summary: Function call with 2-D arrays and -O2 (or
strict-aliasing and inlining) gives random results
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
dBy: jquinsey at entrenet dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45036