Re: [Netstack] proposal for new quantum-core devs

Thanks a lot Bob, Maru and Dave +1 for all Ram On Mar 13, 2012, at 19:57, "Sumit Naiksatam (snaiksat)" wrote: > +1 for all! > > From: netstack-bounces+snaiksat=cisco@lists.launchpad.net > [mailto:netstack-bounces+snaiksat=cisco@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of > Debo Dutta (ded

Re: [Netstack] cloudpipe stuff

In general I completely agree on the VPN service with set of APIs. That's the main motivation, we proposed a "Network Extensions Proposal aka Hybrid Cloud Service for Network resources" in the last Boston Essex summit. The proposal initially is to "solve" the VPN based on IPsec as a first itera

[Netstack] Wiki page for Quantum L3 Spec (Draft) and Blueprint

Hello All: With further reference to our Essex Summit proposal and discussion on L3 abstractions support in Quantum, and recent interest from community members on L3 support in Quantum, we have registered a blue print at https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/quantum-l3-api and posted t

Re: [Netstack] Quantum Layer 3 support

Hi Thiago Absolutely Very timely email We presented a blueprint proposalon L3 support with API and support for L3 services in the Boston summit We have also developing a prototype and spec and planning to have it available for review It would be great to collaborate on this For quick refere

Re: [Netstack] fedora quantum packaging status

Thanks, Chris. We will give it a try and test it. Cheers Ram -Original Message- From: netstack-bounces+radurair=cisco@lists.launchpad.net [mailto:netstack-bounces+radurair=cisco@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of Chris Wright Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 12:38 PM To: netsta

[Netstack] Hybrid Cloud Service Blueprint discussions - Etherpad

http://etherpad.openstack.org/HybridCloudService -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~netstack Post to : netstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~netstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Netstack] Etherpad for Network Services Blueprint

http://etherpad.openstack.org/NetworkServices -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~netstack Post to : netstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~netstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Netstack] Quantum 2011.3 Diablo is out!

Hi Dan: Took a quick look. Thanks a lot for pulling this together. Looks good for the first cut. Few comments/suggestions for now. 1.having a "dir structure" of the Quantum and short explanation would be helpful 2. Under the section 3.4, could you add line suggesting

Re: [Netstack] R:Re: Proposing sessions for Openstack design summitq

Yes, Salvatore. I think we are on the same page. As your rightly pointed out eases the adoption and also from network API/model perspective for nova and “apps” its uniform and simpler Thanks Ram From: netstack-bounces+radurair=cisco@lists.launchpad.net [mailto:netstack-bounces+radura

Re: [Netstack] Proposing sessions for Openstack design summitq

nday, September 19, 2011 9:40 AM To: Dan Wendlandt Cc: Ram Durairaj (radurair); netstack@lists.launchpad.net; Thierry Carrez Subject: RE: [Netstack] Proposing sessions for Openstack design summitq I agree with your approach. I see Ram has already proposed a couple of sessions. It might be wor

Re: [Netstack] Proposing sessions for Openstack design summitq

Thanks a lot Thierry and for the session type suggestion as well. This is of great help to group them all under one track. Cheers Ram -Original Message- From: Thierry Carrez [mailto:thie...@openstack.org] Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 8:33 AM To: Ram Durairaj (radurair) Cc

Re: [Netstack] Proposing sessions for Openstack design summitq

lando [mailto:salvatore.orla...@eu.citrix.com] Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 8:36 AM To: Ram Durairaj (radurair); netstack@lists.launchpad.net Cc: Thierry Carrez Subject: RE: [Netstack] Proposing sessions for Openstack design summitq Hi Ram, Thanks for sharing your proposed sessions fo

Re: [Netstack] Proposing sessions for Openstack design summitq

Hello Salvatore and all: We suppose to have a Netstack track...Its good to follow-up with Thierry to group all the Net stack related blueprint and sessions in one track for all the interested community participants to contribute and discuss. In addition to the list, here are few more items

Re: [Netstack] Quantum diablo-rbp available

Awesome, Congratulations, Netstackers. This is a great milestone and achievement Ram -Original Message- From: netstack-bounces+radurair=cisco@lists.launchpad.net on behalf of Dan Wendlandt Sent: Fri 9/9/2011 5:48 PM To: netstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: [Netstack] Quantum

Re: [Netstack] Merge Proposals - Action Item.

Sent from my iPhone On Sep 9, 2011, at 18:03, "Dan Wendlandt" wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Ram Durairaj (radurair) > wrote: > > > > > Hope this eliminates some of the confusion. While lp837752 is critical and we > need it

Re: [Netstack] Merge Proposals - Action Item.

Hi Dan: Thanks for the responses and reviewing the merge request. My responses are embedded below. Cheers Ram From: Dan Wendlandt [mailto:d...@nicira.com] Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 9:17 AM To: Ram Durairaj (radurair) Cc: salvatore.orla...@eu.citrix.com; Rick Clark (rickclar

[Netstack] Merge Proposals - Action Item.

Hello Dan,Rick, Salv and et al.,: In this week's Netstack IRC meeting, I'd an Action item for resolving the merge requests to bug association and its importance for the next Diablo release. For more context information, please refer the IRC "cut and paste" at the end of this email. Bran

Re: [Openstack] [Netstack] Quantum Diablo-4 Milestone Release

Congrats all Lets push forward towards Diablo release Cheers Ram Sent from my iPhone On Aug 26, 2011, at 15:44, "Dan Wendlandt" wrote: > Hello folks, > > The Quantum Diablo-4 Milestone has been released. > > Download & details are at: https://launchpad.net/quantum/diablo/diablo-4 > > Maj

Re: [Netstack] Quantum Diablo-4 Milestone Release

Congrats all Lets push forward towards Diablo release Cheers Ram Sent from my iPhone On Aug 26, 2011, at 15:44, "Dan Wendlandt" wrote: > Hello folks, > > The Quantum Diablo-4 Milestone has been released. > > Download & details are at: https://launchpad.net/quantum/diablo/diablo-4 > > Maj

Re: [Netstack] Port states

Hi Arvind: Are you also planning to show, in network speak, Administratively UP/Down, Operationaly UP/Down. We don't have to complicate this..but useful while debugging. My $0.02 Ram -Original Message- From: netstack-bounces+radurair=cisco@lists.launchpad.net [mailto:netstack-bounc

Re: [Netstack] plugin-specific unit testing

] Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 11:44 PM To: Ram Durairaj (radurair) Cc: netstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Netstack] plugin-specific unit testing Hi Ram, There's definitely a lot of work to be done in the scope of functional and system test. Would be great if your team want

Re: [Netstack] plugin-specific unit testing

Hi Dan: This is very helpful. Will take a look and let you know. Also I'm wondering about what we can do for "testing" all the dependencies for Quantum to work at the system level. For Example: We need certain level of Nova and also some of the infra level requirement if any, something like a

Re: [Netstack] Quantum API question - port creation

Hi Dan: Responses embedded. From: Dan Wendlandt [mailto:d...@nicira.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:04 AM To: Ram Durairaj (radurair) Cc: Troy Toman; Salvatore Orlando; netstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Netstack] Quantum API question - port creation On Wed, Jul 27

Re: [Netstack] Quantum API question - port creation

I like the model 2 as well. I'm not an API expert, but for any "Cloud API" following asynchronous model is a basic design tenet and IMHO must be supported. On the persistence or DB side, on 802.1qbh plugin, we saw the need for a persistence store. We are adding that function with ORM/mysql. Rohi

Re: [Openstack] [NetStack] Quantum Service API extension proposal

Glad to see we are converging. Couple of things/questions that we need to discuss/decide in our meeting today. 1. For plugin-specific extensions - Option 1: Use DataExtension scheme as in Jorge proposal with Key-Value pairs. Any other options? Or just go with. BTW, I agree with this

Re: [Openstack] [NetStack] Quantum Service API extension proposal

discuss, decide on this as soon as possible and move on to start developing Quantum side extensions. Ram From: Dan Wendlandt [mailto:d...@nicira.com] Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2011 1:06 PM To: Ram Durairaj (radurair) Cc: Ying Liu (yinliu2); openstack@lists.launchpad.net; Jorge Williams

Re: [Openstack] [NetStack] Quantum Service API extension proposal

Hi Dan: As far as I remember, In Design summit, we've agreed to expose "extra" attributes for Virtual networks and any other vendor specific features using "API-Extensions" and possibly thru existing Openstack extension mechanisms. Don't recall that we've concluded on Jorge's proposal. Als

[Openstack] Network service: Quantum and Donabe BPs

Hello All: As per our discussions in Design summit, created 4 Blueprint (BP) placeholder for Donabe...and also see 6 BPs for Quantum ...wondering about need for so many # of BPs... Could we just have two BPs one for Quantum and another for Donabe? That way most of the discussions and the s

[Openstack] Project Donabe: Call for participation.

Hello All: Please join us at Camino Real Room (2nd floor) tomorrow from 1-2, if you are interested in participating in Project Donabe (Container Service) code development efforts. We can start discussing about APIs and all the good stuff. Thanks Ram __