On 22/09/2024 16:34, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
On 19/09/2024 20:04, Dan Mack wrote:
On Thu, 19 Sep 2024, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 19/09/2024 18:16, Dan Mack wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jul 2024, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
So we set uid 53 (bind) at 0.083518302, and then try to bind to
port
953
On 19/09/2024 18:16, Dan Mack wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jul 2024, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
So we set uid 53 (bind) at 0.083518302, and then try to bind to port
953 at 0.093282161.
Are you going to poe a bug with the bind people?
Already did: https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/issues/4793
S
On 25/08/2024 10:05, ft wrote:
I have make an upgrade from 13.1 to 14.1.
uname -a
FreeBSD ftc 14.1-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE-p3 GENERIC amd64
Everything works fine.
My question:
There are some zfs and some snapshots. Can I destroy them or are they
required?
Here is the list:
zfs:
zroot/
The branch stable/13 has been updated by matthew:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=a30b941ea73995e7a92bdc925b6267652a6b3ee2
commit a30b941ea73995e7a92bdc925b6267652a6b3ee2
Author: Matthew Seaman
AuthorDate: 2024-05-27 08:14:15 +
Commit: Matthew Seaman
CommitDate: 2024
The branch stable/14 has been updated by matthew:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=a7abf88b478302fe1e30a1e70cf0f5c01bc58288
commit a7abf88b478302fe1e30a1e70cf0f5c01bc58288
Author: Matthew Seaman
AuthorDate: 2024-05-27 08:14:15 +
Commit: Matthew Seaman
CommitDate: 2024
The branch main has been updated by matthew:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=4354163e5fe8e180f62b892cdc3e51e3d7e4706f
commit 4354163e5fe8e180f62b892cdc3e51e3d7e4706f
Author: Matthew Seaman
AuthorDate: 2024-05-27 08:14:15 +
Commit: Matthew Seaman
CommitDate: 2024-05-28
The branch main has been updated by matthew:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=4354163e5fe8e180f62b892cdc3e51e3d7e4706f
commit 4354163e5fe8e180f62b892cdc3e51e3d7e4706f
Author: Matthew Seaman
AuthorDate: 2024-05-27 08:14:15 +
Commit: Matthew Seaman
CommitDate: 2024-05-28
On 20/12/2023 10:53, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 20 Dec 2023, at 11:25, Matthew Seaman wrote:
I'm getting a failure building FreeBSD-base packages for stable/14 during
buildworld in my poudriere setup:
```
/usr/local/bin/ccache cc -target x86_64-unknown-freebsd14.0
--sysroot=/usr/ob
I'm getting a failure building FreeBSD-base packages for stable/14
during buildworld in my poudriere setup:
```
/usr/local/bin/ccache cc -target x86_64-unknown-freebsd14.0
--sysroot=/usr/obj/usr/local/poudriere/jails/stable14base/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp
-B/usr/obj/usr/local/poudriere/jails/s
On 06/12/2023 07:00, Xavier Humbert wrote:
Hi,
py39-setuptools_scm has been upgrade to version 7, but I got errors with
some ports :
===> py39-anyio-4.1.0 depends on package: py39-setuptools_scm>=6.4 -
not found
While
pkg info py39-setuptools_scm7
py39-setuptools_scm7-7.1.0
Name
On 16/11/2023 16:23, Warner Losh wrote:
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 9:07 AM Jessica Clarke wrote:
On 16 Nov 2023, at 15:07, Jonathan T. Looney wrote:
printf '\t"struct "#s"_lite field "#f" not at offset "#o)\n'
-cat "$temp/asserts"
+echo -e "${asserts}\c"
This isn’t POSIX, and i
On 11/11/2023 19:00, Roger Marquis wrote:
For those who are concerned about backup files being left in non-backup
directories this small script will cleanup .pkgsave files:
DBPATH=/var/db/pkgsave/`date +%G%m%d%H%M`
if [ ! -d $DBPATH ]; then
mkdir -p $DBPATH
fi
for f in `find
On 02/11/2023 16:28, mike tancsa wrote:
On one of my VMs that I upgraded from RELENG_13 to RELENG_14, I forgot
to update the boot loader so now at bootup, I have
ZFS: unsupported feature: com.klarasystems:vdev_zaps_v2
Can't find /boot/zfsloader
What is the best way to recover from this ? Its a
On 25/10/2023 07:47, Xavier Humbert wrote:
Le 10/25/23 08:46, Cy Schubert a écrit :
In message <09a4bfb8-ba61-4e05-b646-973104337...@groumpf.org>, Xavier
Humbert w
rites:
Hi,
When building rust, all memory is eaten, leading to OOM killing almost
everything, eventually failing, and leading to a
On 24/10/2023 13:54, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote:
Does anyone in 'port land' know what the current developments are wrt
CertBot (or py-crypto under its hood)?
CertBot is happily compiling against OpenSSL 3 from ports, but when
running 'certbot', the crypto side of it talks
On 01/09/2023 16:25, Ronald Klop wrote:
I found https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271192
"net/jose: does not compile/link against OpenSSL 3".
It is marked as "BROKEN_SSL= openssl30 openssl31" in
https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/?id=551118aae6f7f68204a1b7f17376521142b98af5
On 21/08/2023 09:06, Christos Chatzaras wrote:
I am aware that work is currently being done for upcoming FreeBSD 14
release and there may not be available human resources, but is there
anyone working on this?
The FreeBSD project doesn't have the capability to fix this
independently of the CPU
On 03/07/2023 19:36, Matthias Fechner wrote:
What I understood from the documentation:
*-s* /server/[#/port/]
I can maintain e.g. my zones from my local computer at home inside a git
repository and use nsdiff and nspatch to push the changes to the server
in the internet?
Correct.
Does the s
On 02/07/2023 12:27, Matthias Fechner wrote:
I have the following problem that changes in a zone file do not get
active, no matter if I reload the zone using rndc or restarting bind
9.16.42 on FreeBSD.
If I update a zone I edit the zone file, adapt the serial in the SOA and
normally do a rndc r
On 16/06/2023 17:57, Matthew Seaman wrote:
I've tried to reproduce the problem, but without success so far. I note
that was using the default options settings for pg_citus which does have
ANONSTATS disabled. Given that enabling ANONSTATS is the only reason
for pg_citus to have anythi
On 16/06/2023 08:32, ft wrote:
On Fri, 2023-06-16 at 07:21 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 16/06/2023 05:45, ft wrote:
A postgresql database v14 is running in a jail.
I installed pg_citus with portupgrade: no error messages
I get an error,
(1). when I create extension citus; or
(2). when I
On 16/06/2023 07:21, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 16/06/2023 05:45, ft wrote:
A postgresql database v14 is running in a jail.
I installed pg_citus with portupgrade: no error messages
I get an error,
(1). when I create extension citus; or
(2). when I change shared_preload_libraries and restart the
On 16/06/2023 05:45, ft wrote:
A postgresql database v14 is running in a jail.
I installed pg_citus with portupgrade: no error messages
I get an error,
(1). when I create extension citus; or
(2). when I change shared_preload_libraries and restart the database
(1)
errormessage:
SQL Error [58P01]
On 03/06/2023 16:07, Xavier Humbert wrote:
Hi,
I'm unable to compile textproc/py-rich :
[root@numenor py-rich]# make all
===> Building for py39-rich-13.4.1
* Getting build dependencies for wheel...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/pyproject_h
On 13/05/2023 13:43, Xavier Humbert wrote:
I'm planning in a few days, as soon as it beeen branched, to upgrade
base from 13-STABLE to 14-STABLE
I'm trying to avoid to rebuild my > 1600 ports.
Is there a wayto determine ports affected by the ABI change, which must
be recompiled ? Obviously Pu
On 17/04/2023 00:35, Steven Stallion wrote:
I submitted https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=267107 6
months ago in October. It's been picked up, however there's been no
movement. Could someone take a look when they have a moment?
I'll certainly do that. Give me a little while to
On 12/04/2023 05:21, Matthias Fechner wrote:
Am 11.04.2023 um 19:54 schrieb Matthew Seaman:
Hmmm... I wonder if this is the shared library provides/requires thing
that pkg does? If you run ldd(1) against the binaries from
gitlab-shell, is there any indication of linking against a shlib from
On 11/04/2023 12:41, Matthias Fechner wrote:
Am 11.04.2023 um 13:23 schrieb Matthew Seaman:
Your initial understanding was correct: BUILD_DEPENDS is for software
required to build a package, but not necessary to be installed at
run-time. In my experience, it works exactly as described.
If
On 11/04/2023 09:45, Matthias Fechner wrote:
Dear all,
I have a question regarding BUILD_DEPENDS.
The manual in bsd.port.mk tells:
# BUILD_DEPENDS - A list of "path:dir[:target]" tuples of other ports this
# package depends to build (between the
"extract" and
#
On 25/03/2023 12:18, LuMiWa wrote:
I did run pkg audit -F today and my question is if is still safe to use
Internet with all of this vulnerabilities, please? Thank you.
It's not significantly any more safe or unsafe than usual. Sure there
are several vulnerabilities affecting you concurrently
On 22/03/2023 01:56, Romain Tartière wrote:
Almost :-D pam_ssh_agent_auth does not support the "new" OpenSSH -sk
keys [1] (keys that are hardware backed [2]). There was some effort to
integrate his PAM module into openssh [3] but it has been abandoned.
Now, this is something that isn't clear
On 20/03/2023 03:50, Romain Tartière wrote:
The branch main has been updated by romain:
URL:https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=d8560936e35c4a0fa797431cbe6e234639df690b
commit d8560936e35c4a0fa797431cbe6e234639df690b
Author: Romain Tartière
AuthorDate: 2023-03-20 03:33:19 +
Commit
On 15/03/2023 13:17, Charlie Li wrote:
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Currently the ports has devel/py-setuptools_scm at version 6.4.2, but
I'm seeing some python packages now wanting setup_tools_scm >= 7.0.0
Now, setuptools_scm is widely depended upon by many python packages,
and updating i
On 15/03/2023 13:17, Charlie Li wrote:
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Currently the ports has devel/py-setuptools_scm at version 6.4.2, but
I'm seeing some python packages now wanting setup_tools_scm >= 7.0.0
Now, setuptools_scm is widely depended upon by many python packages,
and updating i
Currently the ports has devel/py-setuptools_scm at version 6.4.2, but
I'm seeing some python packages now wanting setup_tools_scm >= 7.0.0
Now, setuptools_scm is widely depended upon by many python packages, and
updating it over a major version boundary would probably cause all sorts
of proble
Currently the ports has devel/py-setuptools_scm at version 6.4.2, but
I'm seeing some python packages now wanting setup_tools_scm >= 7.0.0
Now, setuptools_scm is widely depended upon by many python packages, and
updating it over a major version boundary would probably cause all sorts
of proble
On 08/01/2023 18:52, Steffen Christgau wrote:
ip4.addr
A list of IPv4 addresses assigned to the jail. If this is set, the
jail is restricted to using only these addresses. [...] Attempts to
use wildcard addresses silently use the jailed address instead. For
IPv4 the first address given will b
On 06/08/2022 07:51, Yuri wrote:
On 8/5/22 13:19, Mark Millard wrote:
Part of what is going on is that having a NOARCH end result
can still involve the build using build-environment-ARCH
specific toolchains.
You are implying that NOARCH packages should be built on each
architecture individua
On 11/02/2021 16:26, Shawn Webb wrote:
Being a ports newb, I'm not sure how to properly create a port from a
pre-built package. Does anyone have any non-xkcd pointers[1]?
A port is simply a set of instructions to build a pkg. So you're
looking for a set of instructions to build a pkg from a p
On 04/01/2021 12:29, David Wolfskill wrote:
Caveat: Since the switch, I have yet to encounter a case where I needed
to merge a change in (e.g., because of a newly-created user, or there
was a commit to /etc/crontab or /etc/newsyslog.conf). I may find things
rather "more interesting" when that h
On 06/11/2020 20:17, Ryan Quinn wrote:
> Hi Matthew!
>
> Would it be possible to get barman to support multiple versions of postgres?
>
> Here’s the background.
>
> I’m testing barman as a backup solution, and I upgraded barman to version
> 2.11 on my test system. I wasn’t paying attention, so
On 09/08/2020 07:03, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
> I usually run `pkg version` to see what packages have changed.
>
> Previously, that was a more or less instant operation, now it takes over 100
> seconds. The problem is that /usr/ports/INDEX-12 is missing.
Yes. For historical reason, the order of prec
On 17/06/2020 04:23, @lbutlr wrote:
> Thank you, cleared /usr/src and running the svn checkout with that
> URL now. It's still well over a gig so it will be a few minutes
> before trying to build lsof again.
Alas, it is a bit late now, but next time you need to switch branches
like this, use `svn s
On 10/06/2020 15:51, Donald Wilde wrote:
Okay, it didn't work, but discovered INDEX-12 in /usr/ports, so
' grep gcc INDEX-12 | wc -l ' worked.
Such an interesting file, INDEX-12. More research needed. Is it not
INDEX-13 because I did ' make index' instead of ' make fetchindex ' ?
You should al
On 08/06/2020 06:31, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 07/06/2020 15:50, Kyle Evans wrote:
>> Hmm, I think pkg executed the merge successfully when the test user
>> was introduced here. Do you still have the transcript from this
>> upgrade available to make sure that it didn
On 07/06/2020 15:50, Kyle Evans wrote:
> Hmm, I think pkg executed the merge successfully when the test user
> was introduced here. Do you still have the transcript from this
> upgrade available to make sure that it didn't deinstall -runtime due
> to a conflict before reinstalling it?
>
Looks lik
I just had a somewhat amusing time updating my CURRENT pkgbase VM.
pkg(8) managed to blow away my /etc/master.passwd and /etc/group,
replacing them with default versions. I believe this was triggered by
the introduction of the new 'test' user and group upstream. Luckily I
noticed pretty quickly
On 25/05/2020 03:55, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> Thank you, Matthew! This is such gold. Could you maybe dump that into
> a page on the FreeBSD wiki? It'd be nice to have in the PHB but wiki
> would be a great start. Clear explanations like this are precisely
> what users need, and we need to start mak
On 24/05/2020 03:39, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote:
> Is there a "howto" that explains how to build a port from a project that
> is on github? The FreeBSD porters handbook seems to assume a lot of
> knowledge is already understood.
Well, the only thing "different" about porting something from G
On 18/04/2020 03:19, Robert Huff wrote:
> a) according to the Makefile, is it possible to build this with
> python-37? (Or even -36?)
If the Makefile for the port says:
USES= python:27
then the port is for python-2.7.x only. All other python ports will
support python-3.x (
On 17/03/2020 12:58, Florian Limberger wrote:
> On 16.03.20 23:33, Chris wrote:
>
>> For the record. I'm *only* using FreeBSD in this situation. I
>> only mentioned Windows above, for the use of it's boot manager.
>
> If you only use FreeBSD, and also use ZFS, you might find beadm[1]
> interestin
On 07/03/2020 22:38, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> This was only an issue on the "latest" branch. If you don't alter
>> "/etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf", you'll get packages from the "quarterly"
>> branch, which fortunately wasn't affected.
> No, this isn't necessarily correct. I have never modified this
On 18/02/2020 17:20, Yuri wrote:
> Currently maintainers aren't notified when their ports are labeled broken.
>
> Adding broken ports to "Issues that need your attention" e-mails would
> make a difference.
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243271
>
> Who can make this change?
On 01/01/2020 22:03, George Mitchell wrote:
> Assuming you can get poudriere to work. Even by today's standards,
> a low-cost PC is not going to have the juice to support it. And to
> reiterate, the ports framework itself MUST work standalone.
Rubbish. I maintain my own poudriere repo on a mach
On 08/12/2019 18:16, Po-Chuan Hsieh wrote:
> For now, you could try using the patched setup.py from current version [1]:
>
> import setuptools
> if __name__ == "__main__":
> setuptools.setup(use_scm_version=True)
>
> At least it works for me for sysutils/py-ansible-lint 4.2.0.
Good idea. I'
On 05/12/2019 07:36, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> There's a comment in the ChangeLog:
>
>* Fully depend on Pip having PEP 517 implementation #607
>
> and the associated merge:
>
>https://github.com/ansible/ansible-lint/pull/607/files
>
> has the removal of
I'm looking at updating sysutils/py-ansible-lint
(https://github.com/ansible/ansible-lint) and it's got me scratching my
head. Seems there's now no setup.py included in the source code, and
that makes the ports sad:
```
lucid-nonsense:~...ports/sysutils/py-ansible-lint:% make
===> License MIT a
On 22/11/2019 06:19, Victor Sudakov wrote:
2. ICMP traffic in any direction
Sounds like a bad idea. Why would you do it?
Well, for example, if a host in $inside_net sends a UDP datagram to a
host in $dmz_net which generates an ICMP port unreachable message, I
want the host in $inside_net to
On 15/11/2019 15:25, Nick Rogers wrote:
For me the affected ports were sysutils/pftop, sysutils/zfs-stats, and
sysutils/stress, which worked just fine before this commit. Apologies if I
am missing something, but it seems like they are not actually broken?
If you were building these ports previo
On 21/10/2019 14:59, John Kennedy wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 01:59:17PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 21/10/2019 13:31, Sergei Vyshenski wrote:
Is it possible to instruct "poudriere testport" such
that it downloads depends (in a form of binary packages) from the
central repos
On 21/10/2019 13:31, Sergei Vyshenski wrote:
Is it possible to instruct "poudriere testport" such
that it downloads depends (in a form of binary packages) from the
central repository,
and actually tests only the port in question?
Currently, no this is not available. Using another repo to see
On 23/09/2019 14:27, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:27 AM Matthew Seaman wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I put this together as the basis of the class I gave at EuroBSDCon a few
>> days ago, and I thought I'd share it as it might pro
Hi,
I put this together as the basis of the class I gave at EuroBSDCon a few
days ago, and I thought I'd share it as it might prove useful:
https://github.com/infracaninophile/p4pm
This should be able to take an 'as installed' FreeBSD machine with just
a local user account added, or the defau
On 21/09/2019 10:16, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 21/09/2019 09:59, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> So, I have a VM running current which I maintain by building packages.
>> On doing a routine update, I see the following:
>>
>> ```
>> codling:~:# etcupdate
>> Warning
On 21/09/2019 09:59, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> So, I have a VM running current which I maintain by building packages.
> On doing a routine update, I see the following:
>
> ```
> codling:~:# etcupdate
> Warnings:
> Removed file changed: /etc/rc.d/growfs
> Removed fi
So, I have a VM running current which I maintain by building packages.
On doing a routine update, I see the following:
```
codling:~:# etcupdate
Warnings:
Removed file changed: /etc/rc.d/growfs
Removed file changed: /etc/rc.subr
```
Looks like there were quite a lot of changes in the packagin
On 10/09/2019 03:17, Mihir Luthra wrote:
> Also, while replacing gethostby* calls, I came across arp. I learned that
> arp command is only for ipv4 while ipv6 uses ndp protocol. I was wondering
> if it would be useful to make a ndp command for ipv6 just like arp is for
> ipv4?
There already is a n
On 07/08/2019 06:28, Melanie wrote:
> We are a Cloud Software Magazine and would like to publish a news
> story about FreeBSD as your OS is definitely worth introducing to our
> readers. Would it be possible to get some questions answered to prepare
> the news story?
>
>
>
> I am also wondering
On 25/07/2019 10:42, Andy Farkas wrote:
make_index: /usr/ports/archivers/atool: no entry for
/usr/ports/:lang/perl5.26
Done.
1533.047u 907.912s 8:12.79 495.3% 23786+867k 500780+163017io 13720pf+0w
root:/usr/ports # ls -l INDEX-11
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Jul 25 19:07 INDEX-11
root:/usr/
Dear all,
I should have done this years ago, but I am an extremely skilled
prevaricator and it seems that only now is finally the time...
MySQL is no-longer part of my life, so I'd like to off-load some MySQL
related ports:
databases/mysql-connector-java
databases/mysql-connector-java51
On 13/06/2019 17:00, Steve Wills wrote:
Hmm, flavors have to be something that can be installed in parallel,
right? How does that impact binutils?
They don't /have/ to be something that can be installed in parallel.
Different flavours of the same package can conflict with each other.
Look at
On 08/06/2019 19:29, Bob Eager wrote:
> The committer folded the README file into pkg-message, and I disagree
> with this:
> 2) It meant that an end user (without access to the ports tree) didn't
> have an immediate way to see the README contents.
That's not actually correct.
```
% pkg info -D p
On 04/06/2019 06:32, O. Hartmann wrote:
> As far as I know,, the package installation is performed via "chroot'ed"
> environment and somehow /dev/null is out of a sudden not accessible anymore
> while pkg tries to delegate some output to /dev/null.
Assuming you're chroot'd to /chroot, then:
m
On 29/05/2019 10:56, Peter Pentchev wrote:
Hmm, I could be wrong, but isn't ${LOCALBASE} supposed to be where
ports find stuff*during the build*, and ${PREFIX} where they
install the built files? Of course, I haven't actually touched
a FreeBSD ports build in years, so I might very likely be wron
On 15/05/2019 21:11, Brad Davis wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2019, at 1:39 PM, Brad Davis wrote:
>> On Mon, May 13, 2019, at 8:39 AM, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
>>> On Sun, 12 May 2019 20:24:04 -0700
>>> Ashley Chase wrote:
>>>
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 03:44:10PM +0200, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
> On S
On 03/05/2019 17:10, David Boyd wrote:
The vm-image for 13.0-CURRENT
FreeBSD-13.0-CURRENT-amd64-20190503-r347033.vmdk
is only 4.0 GB in size. Previous images were about 31.0 GB.
This smaller image doesn't leave much room to add packages and other
customizations.
Yes, the V
On 29/04/2019 11:52, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
This situation should be improved. Given that etcupdate is in all
supported releases, we can even update UPDATING and the Handbook.
So, does anyone have a pointer to the official procedure?
Basically run:
# etcupdate
towards the end of yo
On 06/04/2019 14:58, Matthias Fechner wrote:
> as pkg cannot handle CONFLICTS_INSTALL I tried now to implement this as
> a preinstall command using @preexec in pkg-plist.
>
> The command should check if a package is installed and stop the
> installation or continue if the package is not installed
On 16/03/2019 21:08, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> How do I stop these emails?
>
> I just retired my commit bit and stopped committing to ports after some
> folks yelled at me for committing to ports without signoff even though I
> was doing ports before the src/ports split.
>
> thanks,
>
> -Alfred
On 12/03/2019 07:50, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> On 12/03/2019 1:39 am, Koichiro Iwao wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm willing to commit this. It fixes lang/python27 to build with
>> libressl{,-devel} but it seems few people interested in that.
>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234568
>>
>> I'
On 07/03/2019 07:22, Antoine Brodin wrote:
> Please don't use the django metaport, this port should be removed and
> people should stop using hacks.
> Someone needs to integrate a USE_PYTHON=django in python.mk
Let me look at that. I never did like leaving D12592 so unresolved.
Although it woul
On 04/02/2019 14:22, Luciano Mannucci wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 13:38:56 +
> Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
>> Tell us the details and we may be able to help.
> Well, I'm migrating some web servers from very old linux to freebsd.
> I need several versions of
On 04/02/2019 12:14, Luciano Mannucci wrote:
> Is there a way to deregister a port without touching port's files?
Only by futzing with the package database directly, which is not
recommended.
Why would you want to do this anyway? Misleading the pkg database as to
what is actually installed on yo
On 10/01/2019 11:58, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día jueves, enero 10, 2019 a las 11:14:19a. m. +, Matthew Seaman
escribió:
On 10/01/2019 10:04, Matthias Apitz wrote:
I've compiled on CURRENT the ports of December 23 from SVN with my
poudriere oven. ANd I have nothing set about FLAV
On 10/01/2019 10:04, Matthias Apitz wrote:
I've compiled on CURRENT the ports of December 23 from SVN with my
poudriere oven. ANd I have nothing set about FLAVOR in make.conf for
python. Why d I habe now some 157 py27 ports and only 4 py3:
$ ls -l /usr/PKGDIR.20181223/py27* | wc -l
157
$ l
On 27/12/2018 01:45, Walter Parker wrote:
> I've just upgraded an existing FreeBSD 11.1 system with php56 to FreeBSD
> 11.2 and php72.
>
> In order to do this, I used a mix of ports and packages to delete php56 and
> all of the php56 extensions and replace them with php72 and php72
> extensions. E
On 21/12/2018 17:10, Andrea Brancatelli wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Just a quick head up Today we update a FreeBSD 11.2 to 12.0 machine
> and our SSHD got broken.
>
> The problem is with HMAC line in the config file, specifically the
> hmac-ripemd160 value. It was legit in 11.2 (and I suspect
> def
On 14/12/2018 10:44, Carmel NY wrote:
> Using poudriere, I attempted to update my system to the new "perl 5.28". I
> made the necessary changes in the "make.conf" files and then attempted to run
> poudriere. At the very beginning of the run, poudriere issued a warning that
> "security/py-certbot |
On 13/12/2018 14:41, Arthur Pirika wrote:
1. If I understand correctly, the version of the ports tree as fetched by
portsnap isn’t the best for working on the tree. I should instead make another
copy of the tree as an svn checkout? Distfiles, however, still go to
/usr/ports/distfiles
If you'
On 10/12/2018 14:54, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
On 11/12/2018 1:43 am, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 10/12/2018 14:10, Paul Macdonald via freebsd-ports wrote:
On 10/12/2018 13:15, Paul Macdonald via freebsd-questions wrote:
Is anyone else seeing py-certbot having lost all installed certs,
and the
On 10/12/2018 14:10, Paul Macdonald via freebsd-ports wrote:
On 10/12/2018 13:15, Paul Macdonald via freebsd-questions wrote:
Is anyone else seeing py-certbot having lost all installed certs, and
the initial registation data?
There was an update on the 7th
Upgrade of py27-certbot-0.28.0_1,
On 12/11/2018 14:58, Karl Pielorz wrote:
How long does it usually take for an updated port (e.g. mysql56-server
which in ports is at 5.6.42) to be available as a pkg? (pkg under FBSD
11.2 is currently 5.6.41).
Which branch are you trcking in your pkg(8) config? If it's 'latest',
then you'll
On 11/11/2018 12:34, Grzegorz Junka wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to understand a bit better how the ports infrastructure works.
>
> 1. Recommended way of upgrading ports is "poudriere ports -p local -u",
> right? But this always gets me the latest version, in which some ports
> may not compi
On 20/10/2018 16:28, Lorenzo Salvadore via freebsd-ports wrote:
>> I just updated my ports tree and then proceeded to run: "pkg version -vL="
>> which produced this:
>>
>> suphp-0.7.2_2 ? orphaned: www/suphp
>>
>> There is nothing about this in either the UPDATING or MOVED files. Has this
>> port a
On 22/09/2018 19:13, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
> As for your question:
> pbr is set in molecule's setup.py as setup_depends, so it should go to
> BUILD_DEPENDS in Makefile. Also make sure that you list all the
> dependencies from the molecule's requirements.txt as RUN_DEPENDS.
That's fixed it, t
So, I've been working on porting molecule
(https://pypi.org/project/molecule/), and I have a port that /almost/
works. I can compile and run molecule from my shell prompt using the
port. Everything seems fine.
Except when I try and build the port inside poudriere. It seems that
python setuptool
On 09/09/2018 19:34, Bjarne wrote:
>
> I have been using python 2.7 so far for all ports, which means all
> python packages are built as py27-something. These python packages are
> all automaticcaly build as dependencies from other packages, for example
> like py27-dnspython which is a requiremen
On 19/08/2018 01:55, Shane Ambler wrote:
>> I run 12-CURRENT on few machines, some more powerful that other (all
>> of them x86_64, march varies).
> You can use freebsd-update by setting up your own update server
> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/freebsd-update-server
freebsd-upgrade(8)
On 15/08/2018 00:35, Dan Langille wrote:
>> On Aug 14, 2018, at 2:55 PM, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Dan Langille dan at langille.org wrote on
>> Tue Aug 14 17:54:01 UTC 2018 :
>>
>>> . . .
>>> At https://dev.freshports.org/www/p5-CGI/ you can see:
>>>
>>> CONFLICTS: p5-CG
On 31/07/2018 11:41, tech-lists wrote:
Hello,
context: freebsd-12 r336215 arm64
I don't want xorg or X11 or any of its components installed on this
system. I install ports in the traditional way, in other words cd port
&& make config && make install. Any ports that in a generic config want
t
1 - 100 of 5573 matches
Mail list logo
