Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 4:13 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Wednesday, February 12, 2025 at 1:59:00 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 11:59 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, February 12, 2025 at 8:26:58 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: &g

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 11:59 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Wednesday, February 12, 2025 at 8:26:58 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 3:23 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Saturday, February 8, 2025 at 9:36:31 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: &

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 3:23 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Saturday, February 8, 2025 at 9:36:31 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 9:59 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Saturday, February 8, 2025 at 7:26:18 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > &g

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Sun, Feb 9, 2025 at 2:10 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Sunday, February 9, 2025 at 5:24:33 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 9, 2025 at 1:41 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Saturday, February 8, 2025 at 9:36:31 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Sun, Feb 9, 2025 at 1:41 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Saturday, February 8, 2025 at 9:36:31 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 9:59 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Saturday, February 8, 2025 at 7:26:18 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > &g

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Sun, Feb 9, 2025 at 1:41 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Saturday, February 8, 2025 at 9:36:31 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 9:59 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Saturday, February 8, 2025 at 7:26:18 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > &g

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 9:59 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Saturday, February 8, 2025 at 7:26:18 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 8:45 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Saturday, February 8, 2025 at 5:46:02 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > &g

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 8:45 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Saturday, February 8, 2025 at 5:46:02 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 7:17 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Saturday, February 8, 2025 at 3:20:43 PM UTC-7 Alan Grayson wrote: > >

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 7:17 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Saturday, February 8, 2025 at 3:20:43 PM UTC-7 Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Saturday, February 8, 2025 at 9:23:11 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 9:35 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > >

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 9:35 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Saturday, February 8, 2025 at 12:29:55 AM UTC-7 Alan Grayson wrote: > > The way I see it there are two frames f1 and f2, *one *rod located at the > origin of f1, fixed in f1, but moving wrt f2. Of course, frames are > coordinate systems

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 11:17 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Thursday, February 6, 2025 at 3:49:11 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 3:46 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Thursday, February 6, 2025 at 6:48:34 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > &g

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 5:48 PM Jesse Mazer wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 3:46 PM Alan Grayson > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thursday, February 6, 2025 at 6:48:34 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: >> >> On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 4:48 AM Alan Grayson wrote: &g

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 3:46 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Thursday, February 6, 2025 at 6:48:34 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 4:48 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Monday, February 3, 2025 at 6:44:29 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Mon,

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 4:48 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Monday, February 3, 2025 at 6:44:29 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 3:16 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Sunday, February 2, 2025 at 11:37:48 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On

Re: SpaceTime Diagrams

On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 12:26 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Tuesday, February 4, 2025 at 10:11:19 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 11:55 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, February 4, 2025 at 9:11:38 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > &g

Re: SpaceTime Diagrams

On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 11:55 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Tuesday, February 4, 2025 at 9:11:38 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 9:42 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, February 4, 2025 at 5:02:00 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > &g

Re: SpaceTime Diagrams

On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 9:42 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Tuesday, February 4, 2025 at 5:02:00 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 5:45 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, February 4, 2025 at 2:50:03 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On

Re: SpaceTime Diagrams

On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 5:45 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Tuesday, February 4, 2025 at 2:50:03 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 4:29 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, February 4, 2025 at 1:51:26 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > &

Re: SpaceTime Diagrams

On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 4:29 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Tuesday, February 4, 2025 at 1:51:26 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 3:09 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > Two points: I don't see what this has to do with the question on THIS

Re: SpaceTime Diagrams

ring of non-simultaneous events with a spacelike separation) is the way to show how that danger is avoided, and both frames can be in complete agreement about all local physical facts despite the disagreement about whether the car ever fits. Jesse > > On Tuesday, February 4, 2025 at 12:13:4

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 3:16 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Sunday, February 2, 2025 at 11:37:48 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 12:09 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Sunday, February 2, 2025 at 9:39:04 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > >

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 12:09 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Sunday, February 2, 2025 at 9:39:04 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 2, 2025 at 11:04 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > *In mathematics, functions have domains and ranges, standard terminology. > A func

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 10:01 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 30, 2025 at 7:36:42 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 9:25 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Thursday, January 30, 2025 at 6:43:18 PM UTC-7 Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Th

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 9:25 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 30, 2025 at 6:43:18 PM UTC-7 Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Thursday, January 30, 2025 at 6:20:35 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 5:38 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > &

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 5:38 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 30, 2025 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-7 Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Thursday, January 30, 2025 at 2:47:05 PM UTC-7 Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Thursday, January 30, 2025 at 2:21:24 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrot

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 4:47 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 30, 2025 at 2:21:24 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 3:33 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Thursday, January 30, 2025 at 11:55:54 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: &g

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 3:33 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 30, 2025 at 11:55:54 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 1:35 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Thursday, January 30, 2025 at 11:16:52 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: >

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 1:35 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 30, 2025 at 11:16:52 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 12:47 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Thursday, January 30, 2025 at 10:28:05 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: >

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 12:47 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 30, 2025 at 10:28:05 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 11:59 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Thursday, January 30, 2025 at 9:38:19 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: >

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 11:59 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 30, 2025 at 9:38:19 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 11:05 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Thursday, January 30, 2025 at 7:59:32 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: &g

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 11:05 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 30, 2025 at 7:59:32 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 9:16 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Thursday, January 30, 2025 at 6:48:21 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: >

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 9:16 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 30, 2025 at 6:48:21 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 12:51 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 6:52:47 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote: > &g

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 12:51 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 6:52:47 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote: > > Whooo! H! > > Brent > > > Another fool who doesn't get it? Another fool who can't think out of the > box? Jesse claims that the LT preserves what it predicts

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 4:30 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 2:10:53 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 9:27 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 2:26:43 AM UTC-7 Alan Grayson wrote: > > On

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 9:27 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 2:26:43 AM UTC-7 Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 1:30:28 AM UTC-7 Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 12:24:33 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer w

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 12:37 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 9:23:31 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 3:30 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 12:24:33 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On W

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 3:30 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 12:24:33 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 1:24 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, January 28, 2025 at 9:01:14 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: &g

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 1:24 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Tuesday, January 28, 2025 at 9:01:14 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 8:54 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Tuesday, January 28, 2025 at 2:56:32 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote: > > On 1/28

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 8:54 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Tuesday, January 28, 2025 at 2:56:32 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote: > > > > > On 1/28/2025 6:49 AM, Alan Grayson wrote: > > I figured you'd jump on my word "separation". You have no idea what I > mean? Of course, events with different coo

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 4:03 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Tuesday, January 28, 2025 at 1:37:33 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 3:12 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Tuesday, January 28, 2025 at 11:37:54 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Tu

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 3:12 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Tuesday, January 28, 2025 at 11:37:54 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 10:16 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Tuesday, January 28, 2025 at 7:28:08 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Tu

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 10:16 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Tuesday, January 28, 2025 at 7:28:08 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 12:52 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Monday, January 27, 2025 at 10:24:41 PM UTC-7 Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Mo

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 12:52 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Monday, January 27, 2025 at 10:24:41 PM UTC-7 Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Monday, January 27, 2025 at 8:45:32 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 8:24 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Monda

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 8:24 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Monday, January 27, 2025 at 4:46:07 PM UTC-7 Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Monday, January 27, 2025 at 1:15:05 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 3:01 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Monday

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 3:01 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Monday, January 27, 2025 at 12:54:57 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 8:32 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Sunday, January 26, 2025 at 9:02:01 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Sun, Ja

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 8:32 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Sunday, January 26, 2025 at 9:02:01 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 10:23 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Sunday, January 26, 2025 at 9:13:54 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Sun, J

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 10:23 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Sunday, January 26, 2025 at 9:13:54 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 1:54 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Saturday, January 25, 2025 at 11:25:53 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote: > >

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 6:54 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Sunday, January 26, 2025 at 3:45:10 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 4:15 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Sunday, January 26, 2025 at 12:42:14 PM UTC-7 Quentin Anciaux wrote: > > Why th

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 4:15 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Sunday, January 26, 2025 at 12:42:14 PM UTC-7 Quentin Anciaux wrote: > > Why this has to continue ? What a waste of energy for a result well known, > it will loop back again, trolls not only destroy a good mailing list, they > destroy e

Re: Clark, on the claim that everything that's possible, MUST happen

On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 12:19 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Sunday, January 26, 2025 at 8:38:32 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 2:32 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Saturday, January 25, 2025 at 10:44:27 PM UTC-7 Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Sa

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 12:26 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Sunday, January 26, 2025 at 10:04:54 AM UTC-7 Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Sunday, January 26, 2025 at 9:13:54 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 1:54 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Satur

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

/2025 6:34 PM, Alan Grayson wrote: > >On Saturday, January 25, 2025 at 6:47:22 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > >On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 8:07 PM Alan Grayson > wrote: > > On Monday, December 9, 2024 at 2:01:28 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker > wrote: > > >

Re: Clark, on the claim that everything that's possible, MUST happen

On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 2:32 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Saturday, January 25, 2025 at 10:44:27 PM UTC-7 Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Saturday, January 25, 2025 at 10:05:20 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 9:56 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Sa

Re: Clark, on the claim that everything that's possible, MUST happen

On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 9:56 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Saturday, January 25, 2025 at 6:57:31 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 8:29 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Saturday, January 25, 2025 at 12:11:15 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On S

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 9:34 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Saturday, January 25, 2025 at 6:47:22 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 8:07 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Monday, December 9, 2024 at 2:01:28 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote: > > > >

Re: Clark, on the claim that everything that's possible, MUST happen

On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 8:29 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Saturday, January 25, 2025 at 12:11:15 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 1:57 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Saturday, January 25, 2025 at 6:57:27 AM UTC-7 John Clark wrote: > > On S

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 8:07 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Monday, December 9, 2024 at 2:01:28 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote: > > > > > Nothing odd about dilation and contraction when you know its cause. > > But what is odd is the fact that each frame sees the result > > differently -- that the c

Re: Clark, on the claim that everything that's possible, MUST happen

On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 1:57 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Saturday, January 25, 2025 at 6:57:27 AM UTC-7 John Clark wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 5:11 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > *> IIUC,* > > > *According to Google, that means the "International Islamic University > Chittagong", but it m

Re: Questions about the Lorentz Transformation (LT)

On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 4:03 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Monday, January 20, 2025 at 2:13:21 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 3:30 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > Below is what Brent wrote to describe his plots: notice that he uses the > car moving

Re: Brent on Parking Paradox

On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 8:06 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Friday, January 24, 2025 at 2:21:43 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 4:04 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Friday, January 24, 2025 at 10:41:45 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Fri, J

Re: Questions about the Lorentz Transformation (LT)

On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 4:13 PM Jesse Mazer wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 3:30 PM Alan Grayson > wrote: > >> Below is what Brent wrote to describe his plots: notice that he uses the >> car moving at 0.8c. But respect to what? He doesn't say. >>

Re: Brent on Parking Paradox

On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 4:04 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Friday, January 24, 2025 at 10:41:45 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 8:53 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Thursday, January 23, 2025 at 11:46:46 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote: > &g

Re: Brent on Parking Paradox

On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 8:53 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 23, 2025 at 11:46:46 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote: > > That's exactly what my diagram shows. Didn't you look at it? > > Brent > > > Sure, I looked at it but I prefer text, and I forgot you're a deaf mute. > And NO, I d

Re: Brent on Parking Paradox

On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 12:06 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 23, 2025 at 6:03:17 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 5:55 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Thursday, January 23, 2025 at 2:51:50 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On T

Re: Brent on Parking Paradox

On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 5:55 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 23, 2025 at 2:51:50 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 4:28 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Thursday, January 23, 2025 at 12:41:30 AM UTC-7 Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Wed

Re: Brent on Parking Paradox

On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 4:28 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 23, 2025 at 12:41:30 AM UTC-7 Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 22, 2025 at 7:10:56 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 8:06 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > On

Re: Brent on Parking Paradox

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 8:06 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Wednesday, January 22, 2025 at 2:00:25 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > Brent hasn't chosen to answer your question, but my guess would be he just > means if you pick some specific event where part of the car

Re: Brent on Parking Paradox

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 5:10 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Wednesday, January 22, 2025 at 3:03:09 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 4:32 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 22, 2025 at 2:20:32 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On W

Re: Brent on Parking Paradox

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 4:32 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Wednesday, January 22, 2025 at 2:20:32 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 4:08 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 22, 2025 at 2:00:25 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > Br

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 4:13 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Wednesday, January 22, 2025 at 1:48:34 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 2:58 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 22, 2025 at 10:32:58 AM UTC-7 Dirk Van Niekerk wrote: > >

Re: Brent on Parking Paradox

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 4:08 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Wednesday, January 22, 2025 at 2:00:25 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > Brent hasn't chosen to answer your question, but my guess would be he just > means if you pick some specific event where part of the car

Re: Brent on Parking Paradox

Brent hasn't chosen to answer your question, but my guess would be he just means if you pick some specific event where part of the car is inside the garage, like the event A of the back of the car passing the garage entry door, in the garage frame the car is fully inside the garage "at the same tim

Re: Length Contraction in SR (again)

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 2:58 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Wednesday, January 22, 2025 at 10:32:58 AM UTC-7 Dirk Van Niekerk wrote: > > Sorry rear door closed and then opened...typo. D > > On Wednesday, January 22, 2025 at 9:30:29 AM UTC-8 Dirk Van Niekerk wrote: > > Forgive me if this was alre

Re: Questions about the Lorentz Transformation (LT)

On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 3:30 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > Below is what Brent wrote to describe his plots: notice that he uses the > car moving at 0.8c. But respect to what? He doesn't say. > I would actually quibble with his statement "In both diagrams the car is moving to the right at 0.8c", since

Re: Questions about the Lorentz Transformation (LT)

On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 12:40 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Sunday, January 19, 2025 at 10:24:23 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 11:26 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Sunday, January 19, 2025 at 4:27:42 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > >

Re: Questions about the Lorentz Transformation (LT)

On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 11:26 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Sunday, January 19, 2025 at 4:27:42 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 5:07 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Sunday, January 19, 2025 at 12:05:06 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > >

Re: The Case for Moderation

On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 4:16 PM John Clark wrote: > On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 11:18 AM Jesse Mazer wrote: > > *>> I think Alan Turing's Proof that there is no general solution to the >>> halting problem and it's corollary that some things are true but >&

Re: Questions about the Lorentz Transformation (LT)

On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 5:07 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Sunday, January 19, 2025 at 12:05:06 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 12:21 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Saturday, January 18, 2025 at 9:30:47 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > >

Re: Questions about the Lorentz Transformation (LT)

On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 5:04 PM Brent Meeker wrote: > > > > On 1/18/2025 8:54 PM, Jesse Mazer wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 8:58 PM Brent Meeker > wrote: > >> >> >> >> On 1/18/2025 4:56 PM, Alan Grayson wrote: >> >> &g

Re: Questions about the Lorentz Transformation (LT)

On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 12:21 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Saturday, January 18, 2025 at 9:30:47 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 8:25 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Saturday, January 18, 2025 at 1:25:08 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: &g

Re: The Case for Moderation

On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 9:14 AM John Clark wrote: > On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 2:45 PM Jesse Mazer wrote: > > *> my central point that Godel's theorem places no limitations on our >> ability to understand/predict dynamics over finite time periods, and that >>

Re: Questions about the Lorentz Transformation (LT)

On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 8:58 PM Brent Meeker wrote: > > > > On 1/18/2025 4:56 PM, Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Saturday, January 18, 2025 at 5:44:46 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote: > > > > > On 1/18/2025 4:32 PM, Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Saturday, January 18, 2025 at 4:28:06 PM UTC-7 Brent M

Re: Questions about the Lorentz Transformation (LT)

On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 8:25 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Saturday, January 18, 2025 at 1:25:08 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 2:55 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Saturday, January 18, 2025 at 11:50:11 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: &g

Re: Questions about the Lorentz Transformation (LT)

On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 2:55 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Saturday, January 18, 2025 at 11:50:11 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 1:19 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Saturday, January 18, 2025 at 10:24:01 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: >

Re: The Case for Moderation

ment, as long as it's addressed. Finally I'm not interested in the sort of one-upmanship that might lead someone to read other people's claims carelessly or uncharitably for the sake of being in a position to "correct" them. Jesse > > On Saturday, January 18, 2025 at

Re: Questions about the Lorentz Transformation (LT)

On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 1:19 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Saturday, January 18, 2025 at 10:24:01 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 12:09 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Saturday, January 18, 2025 at 9:15:17 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: &g

Re: Questions about the Lorentz Transformation (LT)

On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 12:09 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Saturday, January 18, 2025 at 9:15:17 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 9:36 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Saturday, January 18, 2025 at 7:19:41 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: &g

Re: The Case for Moderation

On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 5:29 AM PGC wrote: > > > On Tuesday, January 14, 2025 at 9:06:29 PM UTC+1 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 4:56 AM PGC wrote: > > > > On Monday, January 13, 2025 at 11:58:38 PM UTC+1 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > > Doesn

Re: Questions about the Lorentz Transformation (LT)

On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 9:36 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Saturday, January 18, 2025 at 7:19:41 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 9:09 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Thursday, January 16, 2025 at 5:52:52 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > >

Re: Questions about the Lorentz Transformation (LT)

On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 9:09 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 16, 2025 at 5:52:52 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 7:33 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Thursday, January 16, 2025 at 2:39:55 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > >

Re: Questions about the Lorentz Transformation (LT)

On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 8:40 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Friday, January 17, 2025 at 5:21:58 PM UTC-7 Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Friday, January 17, 2025 at 4:00:56 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 5:18 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > >

Re: Questions about the Lorentz Transformation (LT)

On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 7:22 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Friday, January 17, 2025 at 4:00:56 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 5:18 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Friday, January 17, 2025 at 2:05:42 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > >

Re: Questions about the Lorentz Transformation (LT)

On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 5:18 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Friday, January 17, 2025 at 2:05:42 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 1:37 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Friday, January 17, 2025 at 11:25:54 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > >

Re: Questions about the Lorentz Transformation (LT)

On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 1:37 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Friday, January 17, 2025 at 11:25:54 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 12:31 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Friday, January 17, 2025 at 7:46:06 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > >

Re: Questions about the Lorentz Transformation (LT)

On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 1:41 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Friday, January 17, 2025 at 11:32:57 AM UTC-7 John Clark wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 12:31 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > *> I am halfway through the video you posted. IMO, there can be several > ways to solve a problem and acceler

Re: Questions about the Lorentz Transformation (LT)

On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 12:31 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Friday, January 17, 2025 at 7:46:06 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 9:38 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Friday, January 17, 2025 at 7:29:19 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > >

Re: Questions about the Lorentz Transformation (LT)

On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 9:38 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Friday, January 17, 2025 at 7:29:19 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 7:51 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Thursday, January 16, 2025 at 5:52:52 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > >

Re: Questions about the Lorentz Transformation (LT)

On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 7:51 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 16, 2025 at 5:52:52 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 7:33 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Thursday, January 16, 2025 at 2:39:55 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > >

Re: Questions about the Lorentz Transformation (LT)

On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 7:33 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 16, 2025 at 2:39:55 PM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 2:43 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Thursday, January 16, 2025 at 11:36:48 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: >

Re: Questions about the Lorentz Transformation (LT)

On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 2:43 PM Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 16, 2025 at 11:36:48 AM UTC-7 Jesse Mazer wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 12:02 AM Alan Grayson wrote: > > Using the LT, we have the following transformations of Length, Time, and > Mass,

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >