On Friday, April 11, 2025 at 2:14:37 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 4/10/2025 9:42 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Thursday, April 10, 2025 at 9:43:20 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 4/10/2025 8:34 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
*The boundary condition for the universe is its present state and
On Thursday, April 10, 2025 at 10:42:37 PM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Thursday, April 10, 2025 at 9:43:20 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 4/10/2025 8:34 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
*The boundary condition for the universe is its present state and it's not
finite.*
Brent
How d
On Thursday, April 10, 2025 at 9:43:20 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 4/10/2025 8:34 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
*The boundary condition for the universe is its present state and it's not
finite.*
Brent
How do you* know *that? ISTM, you're speculating and misreprese
On Thursday, April 10, 2025 at 7:58:06 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 4/10/2025 6:56 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Wednesday, April 9, 2025 at 6:14:52 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 4/9/2025 4:42 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Thursday, April 3, 2025 at 12:48:49 AM UTC-6 Alan Grayson
On Thursday, April 10, 2025 at 11:53:52 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
*Correction: Trump's tariff on China is actually 145% not 125% as I said,
sorry. Trump said it was 125% and I foolishly believed he at least knew how
big of a tariff he was putting on our most important trading partner, but
of
On Wednesday, April 9, 2025 at 6:14:52 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 4/9/2025 4:42 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Thursday, April 3, 2025 at 12:48:49 AM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Wednesday, April 2, 2025 at 6:03:49 AM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Wednesday, April 2, 2025 at 5:21:27 AM
On Thursday, April 3, 2025 at 12:48:49 AM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Wednesday, April 2, 2025 at 6:03:49 AM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Wednesday, April 2, 2025 at 5:21:27 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 6:36 AM Alan Grayson wrote:
*> If the universe has no bound
ot if each denominator is squared. This is what I meant
earlier when I wrote we have to take convergence into account. AG *
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy
Batty/Rutger Hauer)
Le jeu. 20 mars 2025, 12:53, Alan Grayson a écrit :
On Thursday, March 20, 2025 at
On Thursday, March 20, 2025 at 11:38:17 AM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
"No" isn't an argument. It's just a claim. My argument is based on set
theory and topology. If an infinite set can be contained in a countable set
of finite sets,
But that's not the case. The number for finite sets is, hypoth
On Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 10:50:41 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/19/2025 9:14 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 3:28:40 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/19/2025 4:56 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 5:40:48 AM UTC-6 John Clark
On Wednesday, April 2, 2025 at 5:21:27 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 6:36 AM Alan Grayson wrote:
*> If the universe has no boundary, then one cannot determine what the CC
could be, since such a calculation requires a boundary.*
*No, it doesn't. *
Brent
On Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 4:23:51 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 4/1/2025 2:17 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 2:48:03 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 4/1/2025 6:27 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 6:47:27 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
On Tue
On Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 10:14:34 PM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 3:28:40 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/19/2025 4:56 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 5:40:48 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 4:30 AM Alan
pid SHMUCK. I'm done reading your shit. AG
On Sunday, 23 March 2025 at 13:17:59 UTC+2 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Sunday, March 23, 2025 at 5:10:20 AM UTC-6 Cosmin Visan wrote:
Awww... so saaad.
Can't you cease with your stupid BS? Only a total moron would consider you
an autho
On Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 1:09:46 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/31/2025 8:49 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Monday, March 31, 2025 at 6:07:49 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/31/2025 3:25 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
Thanks for that data dump. When E was contemplating
On Wednesday, April 2, 2025 at 6:03:49 AM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Wednesday, April 2, 2025 at 5:21:27 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 6:36 AM Alan Grayson wrote:
*> If the universe has no boundary, then one cannot determine what the CC
could be, since suc
On Monday, March 31, 2025 at 6:07:49 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/31/2025 3:25 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
Thanks for that data dump. When E was contemplating the CC, he knew that
gravity was attractive and NOT the cause of the expansion implied for some
values of the CC. Why then would
On Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 1:09:46 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/31/2025 8:49 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Monday, March 31, 2025 at 6:07:49 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/31/2025 3:25 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
Thanks for that data dump. When E was contemplating the CC, he knew
On Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 2:48:03 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 4/1/2025 6:27 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 6:47:27 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 8:26 AM Alan Grayson wrote:
*>>I stand corrected. *
*> So now you understand my que
On Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 6:47:27 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 8:26 AM Alan Grayson wrote:
*>>I stand corrected. *
*> So now you understand my question? AG *
*To quote you "My sarcasim went over your head, way over! AG"*
*I don't get
On Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 7:35:16 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 9:27 AM Alan Grayson wrote:
On Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 6:47:27 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 8:26 AM Alan Grayson wrote:
*>>I stand corrected. *
*> So now you unde
On Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 5:32:42 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 11:49 PM Alan Grayson wrote:
On Monday, March 31, 2025 at 6:07:49 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
>> THINK, AG! When Einstein wrote is first cosmology paper base on GR, he
thought the universe
On Monday, March 31, 2025 at 6:07:49 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/31/2025 3:25 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
Thanks for that data dump. When E was contemplating the CC, he knew that
gravity was attractive and NOT the cause of the expansion implied for some
values of the CC. Why then would
On Monday, March 31, 2025 at 7:14:59 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 3:23 AM Alan Grayson wrote:
> *For Einstein to get his equations to permit a steady state solution,
wouldn't his CC have to augment gravitational attraction, and thus be
negative, but afte
On Sunday, March 30, 2025 at 11:27:14 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/30/2025 9:04 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Sunday, February 2, 2025 at 3:24:53 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 2/2/2025 12:42 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:
Einstein claimed that when his GR field equations predicted an
On Sunday, February 2, 2025 at 3:24:53 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 2/2/2025 12:42 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:
Einstein claimed that when his GR field equations predicted an explanding
universe when he believed in the Steady State theory, he added the CC to GR
to make it consistent with his
On Saturday, March 29, 2025 at 4:10:44 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/29/2025 8:40 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Monday, March 17, 2025 at 9:45:50 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/16/2025 1:51 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
1) What necessitates the use of complex numbers
On Sunday, March 30, 2025 at 8:04:03 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2025 at 8:08 AM Henrik Ohrstrom
wrote:
*> Cosmin, if you live in an european country then you have no excuse.*
*Yes. **I seem to remember reading somewhere that about 85 years ago
extreme right wingers, who wor
er, but it's too far
from my relatives. At 85 I'm not much for fighting.
Brent
In some countries, like Thailand, one needs substantial financial assets
just to be a permanent resident. AG
On 3/29/2025 3:39 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Friday, March 28, 2025 at 11:15:26 PM UTC-6 Bren
On Friday, March 28, 2025 at 11:15:26 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
I'm trying to talk my children and grandchildren into moving to Canada so I
can move too.
Brent
You ought to check the financial requirements to become a citizen of
Canada. They could be rather onerous. Also, FWIW, the noble
On Monday, March 17, 2025 at 9:45:50 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/16/2025 1:51 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
1) What necessitates the use of complex numbers (whereas in GR only real
numbers are used)?
QM exhibits interference so it must have wave-like phases that can add and
subtract. It
What do you mean by L shaped, if there are two separate detectors? AG
n0w
e3b
On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 2:47 PM John Clark wrote:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 2:36 PM Alan Grayson wrote:
*>> LIGO is able to measure the distance between two mirrors 2 1/2 miles
apart to an accuracy of 1/10,0
On Wednesday, March 26, 2025 at 1:25:12 PM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
*Two hours before the first plane reached its target in Yemen, a raid that
was supposed to be a surprise, Trump's imbecilic cabinet used an unsecured
app to have a group chat about it THAT INCLUDED A REPORTER FROM ATLANTIC
MAG
On Monday, March 17, 2025 at 7:53:46 AM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:
James Webb’s survey of 263 galaxies hints at yes
https://interestingengineering.com/science/living-inside-black-hole-james-webb
Critique of the claim: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jPXbFeaZS6c AG
--
You received this
On Sunday, March 23, 2025 at 10:52:00 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 11:18 AM Alan Grayson wrote:
*> Generally speaking, what are the wave lengths of those space variation
waves, and how are they measured? *
*LIGO is able to measure the distance between two mirrors
On Sunday, March 23, 2025 at 5:18:37 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 4:07 AM Alan Grayson wrote:
*> What exactly is waving, space or spacetime,*
*Spacetime. So if you detect a variation in space caused by a gravitational
wave** then you can use Einstein's equa
March 2025 at 11:29:46 UTC+2 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Sunday, March 23, 2025 at 3:15:21 AM UTC-6 Cosmin Visan wrote:
@Alan. At CERN I did what the rest of the asleep people are doing:
Particles! Particles! Particles!. Meanwhile, I woke up from the sleep,
while they continue: Particles! Part
On Sunday, March 23, 2025 at 5:10:20 AM UTC-6 Cosmin Visan wrote:
Awww... so saaad.
Can't you cease with your stupid BS? Only a total moron would consider you
an authority on anything, much less on consciousness. What you have, if
anything, is a string of words which can't DO anything. AG
y mind can be found by reading the papers. When people
refuse to read the paper, everything that is left is to behave like a
mindless IQ 20 entity: "AI! AI! AI! So g".
On Sunday, 23 March 2025 at 04:56:06 UTC+2 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Saturday, March 22, 2025 at 3:17:1
On Friday, March 21, 2025 at 6:51:18 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 11:47 AM Alan Grayson wrote:
*> Is the gravity wave detected by measuring the vibrating change of the
distance between the two separated locations of the detector? If so, how is
this a variation
On Saturday, March 22, 2025 at 3:17:16 PM UTC-6 Cosmin Visan wrote:
@Quentin, thank you for promoting me. Here is also a song that I made while
I was at CERN in the picture that you put.
https://youtu.be/tE675HtopGA
What exactly did you do at CERN. Regardless, you're not a person who
deserv
On Saturday, March 22, 2025 at 3:10:18 AM UTC-6 Cosmin Visan wrote:
Given Alan obsession with utility, I invite him here to explain to us where
does he think that science will eventually go ? More particles ? More
galaxies ? More AI! AI! AI! ? More what ? AVDASGBA SDGASDG BDFBGGASD ? So
what
On Thursday, March 20, 2025 at 2:17:41 PM UTC-6 Cosmin Visan wrote:
Of course it isnt, trololol. Consciousness is all there is.
Can't you cease with your meaningless *stupidity*. Even if you're
ultimantly correct, your "insight" is meaningless crap which leads nowhere.
AG
On Thursday, 20
On Thursday, March 20, 2025 at 7:28:28 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 1:07 AM Alan Grayson wrote:
*> As I recall, the gravitational potential is the negative derivative of
the gravitational force, but if there's no force in GR, how is that
measured? AG
On Thursday, March 20, 2025 at 6:11:01 AM UTC-6 Quentin Anciaux wrote:
AG, your reasoning assumes that because each countable 4D ball shrinks
arbitrarily close to zero, the entire universe must shrink as well. This
misinterprets how infinity works in both set theory and general relativity.
Sh
sday, 20 March 2025 at 10:12:29 UTC+2 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 11:49:50 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/19/2025 10:09 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 10:50:41 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/19/2025 9:14 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On
On Thursday, March 20, 2025 at 2:12:29 AM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 11:49:50 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/19/2025 10:09 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 10:50:41 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/19/2025 9:14 PM, Alan Grayson
On Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 11:49:50 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/19/2025 10:09 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 10:50:41 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/19/2025 9:14 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 3:28:40 PM UTC-6 Brent
; thinking you've written something
useful. AG
On Wednesday, 19 March 2025 at 23:28:40 UTC+2 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/19/2025 4:56 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 5:40:48 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 4:30 AM Alan Grayson wrote:
*>
On Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 3:28:40 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/19/2025 4:56 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 5:40:48 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 4:30 AM Alan Grayson wrote:
*> If the universe is infinite in spatial extent, and
On Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 3:23:16 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/19/2025 4:32 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Monday, March 17, 2025 at 9:45:50 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/16/2025 1:51 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
1) What necessitates the use of complex numbers (whereas in GR only
On Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 5:32:18 AM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Monday, March 17, 2025 at 9:45:50 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/16/2025 1:51 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
1) What necessitates the use of complex numbers (whereas in GR only real
numbers are used)?
QM exhibits
personally doubt there will ever be a quantum theory of gravity. A
repulsive fifth force seems like a simpler possible solution. Is there any
substantive objection to this conjecture? AG
Quentin
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy
Batty/Rutger Hauer)
Le mer. 19
creases
to zero? AG
Quentin
This is *one* of numerous answers given.
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy
Batty/Rutger Hauer)
Le mer. 19 mars 2025, 12:56, Alan Grayson a écrit :
On Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 5:40:48 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at
On Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 2:39:57 AM UTC-6 Quentin Anciaux wrote:
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy
Batty/Rutger Hauer)
Le mer. 19 mars 2025, 09:30, Alan Grayson a écrit :
On Tuesday, March 18, 2025 at 11:52:42 PM UTC-6 Quentin Anciaux wrote:
AG
On Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 5:40:48 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 4:30 AM Alan Grayson wrote:
*> If the universe is infinite in spatial extent, and we run the clock
backward, is all the mass/energy of the observable region confined to a
tiny or zero volume?*
*
On Monday, March 17, 2025 at 9:45:50 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/16/2025 1:51 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
1) What necessitates the use of complex numbers (whereas in GR only real
numbers are used)?
QM exhibits interference so it must have wave-like phases that can add and
subtract. It
On Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 4:01:40 AM UTC-6 Quentin Anciaux wrote:
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy
Batty/Rutger Hauer)
Le mer. 19 mars 2025, 10:19, Alan Grayson a écrit :
On Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 2:39:57 AM UTC-6 Quentin Anciaux wrote:
All
rain. (Roy
Batty/Rutger Hauer)
Le mer. 19 mars 2025, 05:36, Alan Grayson a écrit :
On Tuesday, March 18, 2025 at 10:30:41 AM UTC-6 Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Yes, I’m assuming spatial expansion, not just increasing galactic
distances. The observable horizon expands because the Hubble rate evolves
high
temperature with all mass/energy concentrated nearly as a spatial
singularity at this BB cause a BH to form? AG *
Quentin
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy
Batty/Rutger Hauer)
Le mar. 18 mars 2025, 16:54, Alan Grayson a écrit :
On Monday, March 17, 2025 at 5:03:
On Monday, March 17, 2025 at 5:03:42 PM UTC-6 Quentin Anciaux wrote:
I have been reflecting on the idea that our universe could be the interior
of a giant black hole, but several fundamental questions arise.
How can this account for the apparent flatness of the universe, given that
a black ho
's motives, and generally that you know
anything about anything? I think it will take incurable terminal TB for you
to get the message. AG
On Tuesday, 18 March 2025 at 11:30:12 UTC+2 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Monday, March 17, 2025 at 8:02:20 AM UTC-6 Cosmin Visan wrote:
Finally the wokies are
On Monday, March 17, 2025 at 8:02:20 AM UTC-6 Cosmin Visan wrote:
Finally the wokies are taken out.
If you had some brains, which is obviously not the case, you'd concern your
precious white butt with the increase of travelers coming to the US with
the drug resistent form of TB. Containing th
t whose successful realization would
disprove real quantum theory, in the same way as standard Bell experiments
disproved local physics*."
* John K ClarkSee what's on my new list at Extropolis
<https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>*
6ab
On Sun, Mar 16, 20
James Webb’s survey of 263 galaxies hints at yes
https://interestingengineering.com/science/living-inside-black-hole-james-webb
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
s realization that
gravity isn't a force, is not related to the EP. AG*
On 3/16/2025 4:48 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Friday, March 14, 2025 at 11:41:45 PM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Friday, March 14, 2025 at 11:03:37 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
Except he didn't show any such thi
1) What necessitates the use of complex numbers (whereas in GR only real
numbers are used)?
2) What necessitates the postulate that some, but presumably not all
operators are non commuting?
3) With respect to 2), why is the non commuting difference i*h (or i*hbar)?
TY, AG
--
You received this
1) What necessitates the use of complex numbers (whereas in GR only real
numbers are used)?
2) What necessitates the postulates that some, but presumably not all
operators are non commuting?
3) With respect to 2), why is the non commuting difference i*h (or i*hbar)?
TY, AG
--
You received this
On Sunday, March 16, 2025 at 7:00:22 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 11:48 AM Brent Meeker wrote:
*> They should have held out the threat of a shut down as a negotiating
tactic*
*But I think it's entirely possible that Musk and Trump wanted the
government shutdown and we
On Friday, March 14, 2025 at 11:41:45 PM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Friday, March 14, 2025 at 11:03:37 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
Except he didn't show any such thing and he generally did regard it as a
force, although he saw merit in Minkowski's geometric interpretation.
Br
On Saturday, March 15, 2025 at 1:16:54 PM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Saturday, March 15, 2025 at 9:48:08 AM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/15/2025 8:36 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Thursday, March 13, 2025 at 7:57:32 AM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Wednesday, March 12, 2025 at 10:09
On Saturday, March 15, 2025 at 9:48:08 AM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/15/2025 8:36 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Thursday, March 13, 2025 at 7:57:32 AM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Wednesday, March 12, 2025 at 10:09:15 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
I'm concerned that shutting dow
Maybe the EP just showed Einstein that graity is not a force, so it must be
modeled differently, possibly by geometry? AG
On Wednesday, March 12, 2025 at 3:37:55 PM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:
> As precisely as possible, can anyone describe the function and value of
> the EP in the constr
On Friday, March 7, 2025 at 8:09:52 AM UTC-7 Alan Grayson wrote:
My email response to Roger Penrose's speculations about the root of
consciousness and computability. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=biUfMZ2dts8
Dr. Penrose; What you intuit exists, and seek, is called in Tibetan
Buddhism
On Thursday, March 13, 2025 at 7:57:32 AM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Wednesday, March 12, 2025 at 10:09:15 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
I'm concerned that shutting down the government is just creating the kind
of crisis Trump would like to justify his saving the nation by disba
On Saturday, March 15, 2025 at 5:11:42 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 1:20 AM Brent Meeker wrote:
*>> I can't conclude a person is not intelligent and conscious just because
I don't know his motivations, I can't always explain, even to myself, why I
did what I did other t
well say gravity IS a force, just an idea in
consciousness. The issue is how does one distinguish between a true or
false idea about a gravity, and your "of course" just shows
your ignorance. AG
On Friday, 14 March 2025 at 16:31:55 UTC+2 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Friday, March 14, 2025 at
7 UTC+2 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Saturday, March 15, 2025 at 5:11:42 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 1:20 AM Brent Meeker wrote:
*>> I can't conclude a person is not intelligent and conscious just because
I don't know his motivations, I can't always expl
On Friday, March 14, 2025 at 11:41:45 PM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Friday, March 14, 2025 at 11:03:37 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
Except he didn't show any such thing and he generally did regard it as a
force, although he saw merit in Minkowski's geometric interpretation.
Br
t; gravity wasn't a force;
rather he concluded it from a thought experient of man in free fall. You
can conclude this from his direct quote, which I recently read. AG
On 3/14/2025 2:59 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:
Maybe the EP just showed Einstein that graity is not a force, so it must be
mo
On Friday, March 14, 2025 at 8:31:55 AM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Friday, March 14, 2025 at 6:46:05 AM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Friday, March 14, 2025 at 3:59:42 AM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:
Maybe the EP just showed Einstein that graity is not a force, so it must be
modeled
On Friday, March 14, 2025 at 6:46:05 AM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Friday, March 14, 2025 at 3:59:42 AM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:
Maybe the EP just showed Einstein that graity is not a force, so it must be
modeled differently, possibly by geometry? AG
No. The EP just shows that gravity is
On Friday, March 14, 2025 at 3:59:42 AM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:
Maybe the EP just showed Einstein that graity is not a force, so it must be
modeled differently, possibly by geometry? AG
No. The EP just shows that gravity is equivalent to acceleration ignoring
tidal forces, but the fact
On Wednesday, March 12, 2025 at 10:09:15 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
I'm concerned that shutting down the government is just creating the kind
of crisis Trump would like to justify his saving the nation by disbanding
Congress and ruling by edict. Perhaps though it could be driven the other
As precisely as possible, can anyone describe the function and value of the
EP in the construction of GR? Alternatively, how are the field equations
implied by the EP? TY, AG
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe fr
https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/perfect-cosmological-principle/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegrou
On Tuesday, March 11, 2025 at 11:33:55 PM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Tuesday, March 11, 2025 at 11:03:04 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/11/2025 9:40 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Tuesday, March 11, 2025 at 10:26:37 PM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Tuesday, March 11, 2025 at 1:41:29 PM
On Tuesday, March 11, 2025 at 1:41:29 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/10/2025 11:48 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Tuesday, March 11, 2025 at 12:33:36 AM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/10/2025 11:04 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Monday, March 10, 2025 at 11:15:07 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker
On Tuesday, March 11, 2025 at 11:03:04 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/11/2025 9:40 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Tuesday, March 11, 2025 at 10:26:37 PM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Tuesday, March 11, 2025 at 1:41:29 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/10/2025 11:48 PM, Alan Grayson wrote
On Tuesday, March 11, 2025 at 10:26:37 PM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Tuesday, March 11, 2025 at 1:41:29 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/10/2025 11:48 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Tuesday, March 11, 2025 at 12:33:36 AM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/10/2025 11:04 PM, Alan Grayson
Looks like they'll crash the stock markets. Will the MAGA sychophants
finally come to their senses? AG
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everyt
On Monday, March 10, 2025 at 9:13:21 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 10:03 AM Alan Grayson wrote:
*> Maybe "definitions" is the wrong way to look at the problem. It's really
the unsolved mind-body problem. How does chemistry give rise to
consciousness? *
On Tuesday, March 11, 2025 at 12:48:31 AM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Tuesday, March 11, 2025 at 12:33:36 AM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/10/2025 11:04 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Monday, March 10, 2025 at 11:15:07 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/9/2025 11:14 PM, Alan Grayson
On Monday, March 10, 2025 at 6:43:21 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 2:28 AM Alan Grayson wrote:
*> without a definition of consciousness, I see no basis for claiming
either is conscious.*
*I have 4 questions for you: *
*1) Why do you think definitions are better t
On Monday, March 10, 2025 at 9:20:56 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 9:33 AM Alan Grayson wrote:
*> Someone here, I think it was YOU, who claimed Einstein's field equation
without the CC implied unstable equilibrium.*
*Static versus dynamic, and stable versus
On Monday, March 10, 2025 at 6:53:23 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 8:43 AM Alan Grayson wrote:
*> Which observations were wrong?*
*In 1914 astronomers thought the universe was static, and the stars in the
Milky Way were not getting further apart, and in 1
On Monday, March 10, 2025 at 11:15:07 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/9/2025 11:14 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
I don't think you understand my question. Without a CC, or equivalently
setting it to zero, don't we get a universe which is in UNSTABLE
equilibrium, like balancing a pen
On Tuesday, March 11, 2025 at 12:33:36 AM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/10/2025 11:04 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Monday, March 10, 2025 at 11:15:07 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/9/2025 11:14 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
I don't think you understand my question. Without a C
On Monday, March 10, 2025 at 11:32:10 AM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:
Looks like they'll crash the stock markets. Will the MAGA sychophants
finally come to their senses? AG
Dow approaching 1200 down. AG
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"
On Monday, March 10, 2025 at 6:03:26 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 2:14 AM Alan Grayson wrote:
*> **Without a CC, or equivalently setting it to zero, don't we get a
universe which is in UNSTABLE equilibrium, like balancing a pencil of its
writing tip, *
*No.
1 - 100 of 2472 matches
Mail list logo
