On 20 Oct 2008, at 21:22, warrigal wrote:
I withdraw as many coins as possible from the RBoA.
--Warrigal of Escher
Scratch that. This fails, you are not a Comrade.
--
ehird
On 20 Oct 2008, at 22:37, Elliott Hird wrote:
On 20 Oct 2008, at 21:22, warrigal wrote:
I withdraw as many coins as possible from the RBoA.
--Warrigal of Escher
Scratch that. This fails, you are not a Comrade.
--
ehird
Actually, if you specified an actual chit value they would be
On 20 Oct 2008, at 23:01, Charles Reiss wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 22:22, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
[snip]
2223 ais523UNDEAD PT ends 10/23
05:02:46
Claim of Error: ais523 is not a party to UNDEAD and it is not a
pledge, so this case was not in
BobTHJ - please publish an RBoA report as soon as possible, because I
don't think anyone really knows the current state of it. Be sure to
read ais523's interpretation email,
ofc. But yes, we really need to know.
(So that everyone can evacuate quicker, naturally. ;-) )
--
ehird
On 20 Oct 2008, at 23:32, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Unless of course you'd rather the courts stayed out of your private
affairs, in which case this is part of the full implications that you
weigh when not doing something that you SHOULD. I'm please that the
UNDEAD (*if* it exists, its existence I neit
On 20 Oct 2008, at 23:45, warrigal wrote:
I withdraw as many coins as possible from the RBoA.
Thanks a bunch. More unknown gamestate. Sigh. We need BobTHJ's report.
--
ehird
On 20 Oct 2008, at 23:39, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Bha hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Oh thanks ehird, that's
sincerely the best
ironic laugh I've had in this forum since you joined.
I'd love for you to point out the things I've done to make that
hypocritical, if you
please.
--
ehird
On 21 Oct 2008, at 00:09, Kerim Aydin wrote:
It also means that "fishing expeditions" led by non-members armed
with the potential name of a contract (but nothing more) should be
discouraged by the Rules lest the means become a burden. I hope the
current case does so discourage.
Scam plotting
On 21 Oct 2008, at 05:39, Roger Hicks wrote:
I leave for the day to go hear Governor Palin speak
My condolences.
and I come back to this. I'm tempted to step back and let someone else
sort this out (since socialism is ruling the day?)I not only
have to make
sense of the RBOA, but the
On 21 Oct 2008, at 05:35, Ed Murphy wrote:
tl;dr. Does this boil down to "exchange rates allow me to move assets
around with the net effect of spending X to gain X+Y, with the RBoA
correspondingly losing Y"?
It boils down to "ding dong, the RBoA is dead!".
--
ehird
On 21 Oct 2008, at 07:08, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 13:51, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I PBA-deposit a 5 crop and a Points Voucher (for ^34).
I PBA-withdraw a 6 crop and a 0 crop (spending ^27).
I mill 5/6=X and 5/6=X using my two Division Mills.
I mill 4*8=X and 4*8=X
On 21 Oct 2008, at 01:00, Pavitra wrote:
If the PBA has 6 X Crops, I PBA-withdraw an X Crop for ^18.
Sorry bud, you have no coins.
--
ehird
On 21 Oct 2008, at 12:59, comex wrote:
No, rather the former. The RBoA still has lots of Coins, so chits
have only a slightly depreciated value.
The point is, however, that all the RBoA is really useful for now is
switching to coins.
--
ehird
On 21 Oct 2008, at 15:27, Roger Hicks wrote:
Liberalism springs from a failure of rational thinking
So does assuming, and so do generalizations.
--
ehird
On 21 Oct 2008, at 15:42, Roger Hicks wrote:
Oops...and finally, through your PBA deposit net you 68 coins (instead
of 60) I am only considering 60 coins to be deposited in the RBOA.
BobTHJ
Actually, the whole thing was ineffective, due to incorrectly
specified rates.
--
ehird
On 21 Oct 2008, at 16:13, comex wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The point is, however, that all the RBoA is really useful for now is
switching to coins.
...until people start depositing more assets in the RBoA, and there's
no
On 21 Oct 2008, at 17:05, Roger Hicks wrote:
Ok, now we have a problem. Five 7 crops will cost you 360 chits and
you only have 334. I'm considering this a withdraw of four 7 crops,
and will wait on ehird to determine what occurs on the PBA side before
continuing. You have (334 - 288 =) 46 chits.
On 21 Oct 2008, at 18:09, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
ehird (what a blatant ripoff...)
In defense of ehird, some context was lost. E submitted that before
the contest as a possible rewrite to the Rule (correcting some meter
IIRC) and when the contest started as
On 21 Oct 2008, at 17:05, Roger Hicks wrote:
Ok, now we have a problem. Five 7 crops will cost you 360 chits and
you only have 334. I'm considering this a withdraw of four 7 crops,
and will wait on ehird to determine what occurs on the PBA side before
continuing. You have (334 - 288 =) 46 chits.
ttdf
Begin forwarded message:
From: Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 21 October 2008 18:18:01 BDT
To: agora-discussion@agoranomic.org
Subject: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Bank run, hopefully working this time
On 21 Oct 2008, at 17:05, Roger Hicks wrote:
Ok, now we have a problem. Five 7
On 21 Oct 2008, at 18:23, Roger Hicks wrote:
I know the "I deposit the resulting 65 Chits for 650 Coins" fails as
ais523 got the currencies backward.
He specified that incorrect PBA rates should still work. So e
deposited 65 chits for
some coins. Ugh.
--
ehird
On 21 Oct 2008, at 18:25, Elliott Hird wrote:
On 21 Oct 2008, at 18:23, Roger Hicks wrote:
I know the "I deposit the resulting 65 Chits for 650 Coins" fails as
ais523 got the currencies backward.
He specified that incorrect PBA rates should still work. So e
deposited 65 chits
On 21 Oct 2008, at 18:33, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:28, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wait, you can't deposit chits for coins. Yep, fails.
Soagain the real question: Did ais523 succeed in depositing zero,
four, or five 7 crops in the PBA?
Bob
On 21 Oct 2008, at 18:58, Ed Murphy wrote:
ais523 wrote:
ehird (what a blatant ripoff...)
IIRC that one was explicitly presented as a revision of the rule in
question, to tighten up meter or something.
No, that was Pavitra's version, which I copied wholesale.
--
ehird
On 21 Oct 2008, at 19:59, Roger Hicks wrote:
Here is an unofficial RBOA report covering the bank run scam and all
messages up until ais523's message "Converging the Gamestates". In
order to calculate that message I will need to know from ehird the
number of coins that ais523 presently possesses
http://agora.eso-std.org/pba-report is an unofficial report which
contains a note of the
coins that ais523 deposited into the RBoA.
I now request an RBoA report which I can base calculations for the
following actions
for.
Then we can ratify both bank's reports and this will all be over.
Th
On 21 Oct 2008, at 22:40, Alex Smith wrote:
The relevant part seems to be that I deposited a total of 551 Coins
into
the RBoA, during the scam and shortly afterward. That should let
BobTHJ
be able to calculate how many Chits I had altogether when I started
buying assets.
I think most of them
On 21 Oct 2008, at 22:46, Roger Hicks wrote:
2008-10-20 19:33 - ais523 withdraws two X crops for ^37
conditional on the
deposit succeeding. (it didn't - ed, 2008-10-21) ais523 transfers
all eir coins
to the RBoA (^551 - ed, 2008-10-21).
So, 551 coins are deposited into the RBOA?
BobTHJ
On 21 Oct 2008, at 22:57, Alex Smith wrote:
So I deposited ^551 into the RBoA altogether.
Working out how much I deposited when is both much more difficult
and irrelevant.
--
ais523
Oh, I see. I will include a note in my report.
--
ehird
On 21 Oct 2008, at 23:03, Roger Hicks wrote:
Please disregard this last message. It is utterly incorrect. I will
repost it.
Yay! So are you up to date on RBoA matters? If so, once a [proto-]
report is posted I can
resolve the last few PBA transactions, we can ratify the reports, etc.
--
e
On 22 Oct 2008, at 11:50, Joshua Boehme wrote:
In times of trouble and of strife,
We all need some joy in life,
Rejoice, Agora, and delight,
Out of an impulsive night,
Returns a long-time wayward bard,
From eir studies, often hard,
Cramming, 'till eir head was full,
Knowledge actuari
On 22 Oct 2008, at 16:46, Roger Hicks wrote:
Is this really necessary? You already made your point with the first
scam. Intentionally devaluing other players using already exposed
loopholes is frowned upon, isn't it?
It wasn't a scam. It was stated that 1 chit = 10 coins. ais523 was
just fix
On 22 Oct 2008, at 19:16, Alex Smith wrote:
I'd also like to point out that the current exaggerated rate is quite
possibly correct. The PBA's designed to adjust exchange rates
automatically, and I think it'll automatically adjust so that a
Coin is
worth 10 Chits if people withdraw and deposit
On 22 Oct 2008, at 20:04, Ian Kelly wrote:
Doesn't matter. The RBoA has a surplus of coins. Might as well put
them to use, and if that temporarily reduces the available PBA assets
as a side-effect, all the better.
Yes, let's punish it for not being vulnerable to rate scams.
--
ehird
On 22 Oct 2008, at 20:38, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I PBA-withdraw a WRV.
ais523 beat you to it.
I transfer a WRV to the PNP
This succeeds. :-P
--
ehird
On 22 Oct 2008, at 21:14, Ian Kelly wrote:
I PBA-withdraw 7 1 crops for 113 coins.
Thanks for improving the rates! The PBA is designed to reward you for
that, and now
you've made the rates better so it's good for all.
However, that withdraw fails as it'd actually cost you 112 coins.
--
e
On 22 Oct 2008, at 22:46, Ian Kelly wrote:
but for some reason the PBA doesn't seem to have much of actual value.
That's because PBA's designed not to stockpile things which are very
valuable, like 2
crops.
--
ehird
On 22 Oct 2008, at 23:05, Ian Kelly wrote:
Yes, and they always seem to get withdrawn by the same minority of
coinholders, which suggests that in the PBA the slower-to-react
players are just feeding the faster ones.
No, it would seem like there aren't many Comrades at the moment and
of thos
On 22 Oct 2008, at 23:30, Bayes wrote:
Bayes submits the following proposal, titled "Plugging grafts
possibility hang,"
(AI=1):
comex ran this despite me yelling at him not to.
--
ehird
On 22 Oct 2008, at 23:21, Ian Kelly wrote:
I PBA-withdraw a 2 crop for 27 coins (and could somebody verify that
my coin holdings are now 153? the web report claims I only have 93
before this transaction).
Why would you have that many?
You now have ^66.
--
ehird
On 22 Oct 2008, at 23:40, Ian Kelly wrote:
I withdrew ^250 from the RBoA, withdrew 2 1-crops for ^23, withdrew 6
VP for ^63, deposited several note credits for ^168, withdrew 2
5-crops for ^39, withdrew 7 1-crops for ^112, and finally withdrew a
2-crop for ^27. That adds up to ^154.
Hmm, ok
On 22 Oct 2008, at 23:46, comex wrote:
Proposal: Monstercracy (AI=1, II=0)
You are not Mad Scientist and I see no reason to interfere with MS/
Monster in this way.
--
ehird
On 23/10/2008, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I join the PBA.
>> I PBA-deposit all my 6 crops (I think this gets me ^156).
>> I RBoA-deposit all my coins (I think this gets me 1560 chits).
>> I become a Banker.
>> I RB
On 23 Oct 2008, at 00:03, Ian Kelly wrote:
I RBoA-deposit 154 coins for 1540 chits.
I RBoA-withdraw 5 X crops for 825 chits.
I destroy all my remaining chits.
I leave all banks to which I am a party.
-root
Works fine.
On 23 Oct 2008, at 01:02, Ed Murphy wrote:
I have 482 chits, plus (* = D
On 23 Oct 2008, at 16:07, Roger Hicks wrote:
Per the AAA the PBA only has one 5 crop. I'm considering it to be
withdrawn unless I hear otherwise from ehird.
OK, my web report assumes it all works, and I'm writing a script to
manage all this for
me, so no immediate fix, but I will include t
On 23 Oct 2008, at 16:32, Roger Hicks wrote:
Fails. the PBA has no X crops.
Um, if you check my online report, I already processed these actions.
It did have one,
but e took it out.
--
ehird
On 23 Oct 2008, at 16:43, Roger Hicks wrote:
Nope...it sure didn'tunless you can tell me where it came from.
Oh...okay. oO( Good thing my script will sort this out... good thing
ratification will
sort this out... )
--
ehird
On 23 Oct 2008, at 16:32, comex wrote:
Why exactly would this work?
Do you like fruit pancakes?
--
ehird
http://agora.eso-std.org/pba-report
New report format. Stuff was different, I messed up, this is made by
a program, it's
correct.
Comments welcome.
@BobTHJ: A program has now verified that yes, it did have an X crop.
It's probably in
the history somewhere.
--
ehird
On 23 Oct 2008, at 19:54, Ed Murphy wrote:
I'm treating this as ineffective until/unless you produce some
convincing evidence that such a contract exists and has Sgeo and
you as parties.
Well, Sgeo is a party even if e doesn't know it.
You happen to be a party too, I believe you are obligated
On 23 Oct 2008, at 20:14, Elliott Hird wrote:
http://agora.eso-std.org/pba-report
New report format. Stuff was different, I messed up, this is made
by a program, it's
correct.
Comments welcome.
@BobTHJ: A program has now verified that yes, it did have an X
crop. It's probab
On 23 Oct 2008, at 20:14, Elliott Hird wrote:
http://agora.eso-std.org/pba-report
New report format. Stuff was different, I messed up, this is made
by a program, it's
correct.
Comments welcome.
@BobTHJ: A program has now verified that yes, it did have an X
crop. It's probab
On 23 Oct 2008, at 20:20, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Show us why we all are, please? -G.
I'd love to, but that'd violate section 7.
--
ehird
On 23 Oct 2008, at 20:26, Elliott Hird wrote:
OK, now you can look.
--
ehird
Note - the stuff the PBA has is just from root's leaving.
It calculates for the version of the PBA (soon to be resolved) where
it's just
destroyed. Although when that's resolved, all the
On 23 Oct 2008, at 20:40, Ed Murphy wrote:
Proposal: The Monster has reached critical mass
How dare you. It's a good thing we be exporting that thing into B!!
--
ehird
On 23 Oct 2008, at 21:00, Roger Hicks wrote:
You're showing ais523 depositing an X crop as part of the original
bank run scam. To the best of my knowledge e did not. Therefore it can
not withdraw it later.
I'm pretty sure e did, considering e wrote that log.
--
ehird
On 24/10/2008, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://sgeo.diagonalfish.net/agora/newmain.htm is an updated version
> of agoranomic.org, so perhaps Taral might use this..
> Comments?
> Thanks to woggle for help with some content!
>
Please don't abuse murphy's slow machine.
On 24/10/2008, Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 24/10/2008, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> http://sgeo.diagonalfish.net/agora/newmain.htm is an updated version
>> of agoranomic.org, so perhaps Taral might use this..
>> Comments?
>> Than
On 24 Oct 2008, at 07:42, Ian Kelly wrote:
GreyKnight both came up with the heraldry and created the image. Eir
domain appears to be gone, but eir email was yahoo, and I assume it
probably still works.
I had luck contacting him via MemoServ on freenode (e was apparently
an #esoteric
deniz
On 24 Oct 2008, at 18:06, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Geoffrey Spear
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I withdraw 74 coins from the RBoA for 395 chits.
Since that probably failed, I instead withdraw 65 coins for 390 chits.
(I rounded in the wrong place I think)
Waitin
On 24 Oct 2008, at 18:18, Roger Hicks wrote:
I RBoA-deposit ^50 for 500 chits.
I'll assume for now that this works, though ehird please let me know
if Murphy has insufficient coins to make this RBOA deposit.
It doesn't. Recorded at http://agora.eso-std.org/pba-report;
basically no collatera
On 24 Oct 2008, at 18:32, Alex Smith wrote:
According to ehird's website, Murphy only had ^43 at that point.
ehird,
care to make that official?
I already said that to a-d.
--
ehird
On 24 Oct 2008, at 18:34, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:31, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 24 Oct 2008, at 18:18, Roger Hicks wrote:
I RBoA-deposit ^50 for 500 chits.
I'll assume for now that this works, though ehird please let me know
if
On 24 Oct 2008, at 18:36, Roger Hicks wrote:
Here you succeed in withdrawing 11 Coins for 66 chits, leaving you
with 2 chits remaining.
Now come on. "instead" and the context clearly means it shouldn't
happen if the previous
succeeded.
--
ehird
On 24 Oct 2008, at 19:42, Ed Murphy wrote:
I RBoA-withdraw as many coins as I can.
BobTHJ?
--
ehird
On 24 Oct 2008, at 19:43, Ed Murphy wrote:
You should link to this from http://www.nomictools.com/
Sidebar.
--
ehird
On 24 Oct 2008, at 20:26, Roger Hicks wrote:
NOTE: After this withdraw I show the RBoA having 260 coins remaining.
The PBA would seem to have a different figure. What's the difference?
I dunno. I don't have your recent change history; you have the PBA's.
Search for 'RBoA',
all the lines are
On 24 Oct 2008, at 21:39, comex wrote:
I agree to the following pledge:
{
This is a pledge. Bones are a currency. The Treasurer is the
recordkeeper of Bones. Initially the Treasurer is comex.
}
Royal Bank of UNDEAD!
--
ehird
On 24 Oct 2008, at 22:47, Ed Murphy wrote:
ITYM "Contest".
ITYM "unambiguous".
--
ehird
On 24 Oct 2008, at 23:36, 0x44 wrote:
I become party to the Fantasy Rules Contest.
I become a Farmer.
I become party to the Vote Market.
I believe you would like the PBA. ;-)
--
ehird
On 25 Oct 2008, at 02:37, warrigal wrote:
If you join the Llama Party, you can force BobTHJ and me to vote
AGAINST (unless we're both FOR it, in which case you'll be voting
AGAINST and we'll be voting FOR).
If e joins the Llama Party e has less of a vote.
--
ehird
On 25 Oct 2008, at 16:04, warrigal wrote:
E has more of a vote, if eir votes are AGAINST.
But in other cases...
--
ehird
On 25 Oct 2008, at 18:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I spend E G# B to increase ehird's caste to Delta, unless this would
violate the Note Exchange agreement. (I don't think it does, but this
is from memory.)
Oh, you taunter...
--
ehird
On 25 Oct 2008, at 19:07, warrigal wrote:
Claim of error: The above was actually sent by ehird. Thank you for
pointing out that a fake From: address was used.
It absolutely was not, as e said e was going to do it privately on
IRC beforehand.
--
ehird
On 25 Oct 2008, at 21:19, Ian Kelly wrote:
FOR x 5. Down with the PBA!
Damn that evil thing with the qualities of not being incredibly
exploitable re: rates!
Seriously, what's wrong with it?
--
ehird
Full disclosure. Both I and ais have root on the serv in q.
On 25/10/2008, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 25, 2008, at 1:16 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I spend E G# B to increase ehird's caste to Delta, unless this would
>> violate the Note Exchange agreement. (I don't t
On 26 Oct 2008, at 03:07, warrigal wrote:
So as to be able to lend more money:
I deposit a Vote Point for 21 coins. I deposit a Vote Point for 20
coins. I deposit a Vote Point for 19 coins. I deposit a Vote Point for
18 coins. I deposit a Vote Point for 17 coins. I deposit a Vote Point
for 16 c
On 26 Oct 2008, at 03:42, Ian Kelly wrote:
Nothing in particular. Just the scams annoyed me, and I'm feeling
petty.
The scams are pretty unrelated to the PBA itself, though; just
because I was pretty
satisfied with them and said "sure" to ais523 finishing it off later
doesn't mean the
On 26 Oct 2008, at 06:43, Jamie Dallaire wrote:
This is a partnership between X and Y. If the Dow hits 6000 before
hitting 12000, X must transfer 1000 chits [[not sure what those are
yet...]] to Y. Else, Y must transfer 1000 chits to X.
Chits are the currency of the Reformed Bank of Agora,
On 26 Oct 2008, at 14:51, Roger Hicks wrote:
I would recommend against the doom and gloom that indicates teh RBOA
will fail. Despite any setbacks it is still doing fine.
However, its model has been shown to be fundamentally flawed.
--
ehird
On 26 Oct 2008, at 15:18, Roger Hicks wrote:
Not at all. It just proved to be a useful too to balancing the PBA's
initial rate flaws. Now that the PBA rates are more in line with what
they should be the RBOA abuse should slow or stop completely.
...until actual usage patterns show up a differ
On 26 Oct 2008, at 16:29, Roger Hicks wrote:
Revenge? Vindication? Grumpiness?
Waaah, my bank was scammed.
--
ehird
On 26 Oct 2008, at 17:42, Roger Hicks wrote:
Anyway, anyone want to fill my Buy ticket? I want to see these
distributed today.
All of the active PerlNomic members seem to be PBA-{neutral,supportive}.
--
ehird
14:05:51 fungot: If your response to this message makes sense
as a set of obligations to impose on me in Agora, I pledge to follow
them.
14:05:51 comex: ( a) as soon as possible after being made
aware of this condition, randomly select a copy of the requested
records within one week.
14:0
On 26 Oct 2008, at 21:36, Roger Hicks wrote:
OopsI had another (highly secret) reason for doing thisbut I
just realized it won't work after all. Ah well.
Can I have my VP now?
--
ehird
On 26 Oct 2008, at 22:11, comex wrote:
I deposit all of my non-fixed assets which have an exchange rate
into the PBA.
>__<
God damn it.
--
ehird
On 27/10/2008, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 6:11 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I deposit all of my non-fixed assets which have an exchange rate into the
>> PBA.
>
> I withdraw all assets that I deposited in this message, except for 2 VP.
>
can't afford all of
On 27 Oct 2008, at 03:56, Ian Kelly wrote:
Ironic.
Oh? Not very.
Messing with people's contracts from inside their framework is fine.
Messing them up via proposal is not.
--
ehird
On 27 Oct 2008, at 13:34, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
comex: you shouldn't purposely make things difficult for the
recordkeepors of badly-designed banks.
The RBoA has exactly the same problem, except BobTHJ controls almost
every currency it
trades in anyway.
--
ehird
On 27 Oct 2008, at 13:10, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
For practical reasons, such announcements SHOULD be avoided to
prevent cascading of
unknown-at-the-moment-but-platonically-unambiguous gamestate.
tell that to comex
--
ehird
On 27 Oct 2008, at 14:28, comex wrote:
I think there's just a fundamental problem trading assets with
different recordkeepors. I repeat that automation would be nice-- one
entity could effectively recordkeep all assets anyone cared to make,
removing the current constraints on the asset system.
On 27 Oct 2008, at 14:33, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
Proto: PNP becomes the Accountor, someone besides me writes the code
to make that work, and all contracts are amended to remove the
recordkeepors of the assets they define.
Proto: Agora absorbs PerlNomic.
--
ehird
On 27 Oct 2008, at 15:13, Roger Hicks wrote:
I note that if I didn't have to spend several hours each day sorting
out crazy transactions like this I would have plenty of time to
publish reports for the contracts that I manage.
Hear, hear.
--
ehird
On 27 Oct 2008, at 16:31, Roger Hicks wrote:
The total amount of coins ais523 deposited during the Bank Run was
551, not 719.
Incorrect. That was how much I thought. My program says otherwise.
2008-10-20 19:39 -- RBoA transfers ^275 to root.
This was 250 coins, not 275.
Nope. Again, I th
On 27 Oct 2008, at 17:06, Ian Kelly wrote:
Why? The whole point of making an R1728 contract is to let the
contract be governed by Agora. Messing with things by proposal is a
long tradition in Agora.
It'd help if this were actually interesting. Even comex doesn't
approve eir own
proposal;
On 27 Oct 2008, at 17:48, Roger Hicks wrote:
Just to clarify: I really don't want to see the demise of the PBA by
proposal.
Then vote against the mental health act.
--
ehird
On 27 Oct 2008, at 16:44, Roger Hicks wrote:
2008-10-20 19:39 -- RBoA transfers ^275 to root.
root clearly specifies in eir e-mail that e is withdrawing 250 coins.
> I believe I have 4337 chits. I withdraw 394 coins for 4334 chits; if
> I have fewer chits than 4334, then I withdraw as man
On 27 Oct 2008, at 18:17, Roger Hicks wrote:
ehird, this is the message of root's I am referring to.
OK. Will process
On 27 Oct 2008, at 01:34, warrigal wrote:
I do this 30 times: if I have more than 50 VP, I deposit 1 VP for at
least 15 coins.
bobthj, please tell me how many vp warriga
On 22 Oct 2008, at 23:40, Ian Kelly wrote:
I withdrew ^250 from the RBoA, withdrew 2 1-crops for ^23, withdrew 6
VP for ^63, deposited several note credits for ^168, withdrew 2
5-crops for ^39, withdrew 7 1-crops for ^112, and finally withdrew a
2-crop for ^27. That adds up to ^154.
BobTHJ..
On 27 Oct 2008, at 18:26, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:23, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 22 Oct 2008, at 23:40, Ian Kelly wrote:
I withdrew ^250 from the RBoA, withdrew 2 1-crops for ^23,
withdrew 6
VP for ^63, deposited several note credits for ^168, wi
501 - 600 of 1799 matches
Mail list logo
