Luck
AI: 2
II: 1
{
Replace the text of R2156 with:
{{
The eligible voters on an ordinary decision are those entities
that were active players at the start of its voting period. The
voting limit of an eligible voter on an ordinary decision is eir
Luck at the start of its voting pe
On 1 Nov 2008, at 05:19, Roger Hicks wrote:
I resolve this motion:
APPROVE:
BobTHJ - 2399 chits
Taral - 2224 chits
DISAPPROVE:
woggle - 639 chits
The motion is approved. I make the changes as outlined above.
THE RBOA IS NOW A MOUSETRAP.
Get out while you still can.
--
ehird
On 1 Nov 2008, at 06:05, Roger Hicks wrote:
5828 D 2 2.0 Wooble More contests
AGAINST - Don't fix what isn't brokenthe PRS does this just fine.
Of course it's broken. the PRS is a stupid hack that gets around the
rules but had to
be ACTIVATED by the rules!
--
ehird
On 1 Nov 2008, at 12:36, Ed Murphy wrote:
Mon 29 Sep 01:03:13 ehird : Murphy> ehird (JavaScript)
CoE: Murphy did that.
--
ehird
q wrote:
> On 1 Nov 2008, at 05:19, Roger Hicks wrote:
>
>> I resolve this motion:
>>
>> APPROVE:
>> BobTHJ - 2399 chits
>> Taral - 2224 chits
>>
>> DISAPPROVE:
>> woggle - 639 chits
>>
>> The motion is approved. I make the changes as outlined above.
>
>
> THE RBOA IS NOW A MOUSETRAP.
>
> Get
On 1 Nov 2008, at 13:45, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I intend, with 2 support, to initiate a criminal CFJ against the
person with the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED], alleging e violated
Rule 2170 by intending to mislead others as to eir identity in at
least the signature on the above-quoted message,
On 31 Oct 2008, at 18:20, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I intend, with the support of the People, to amend the PBA contract by
replacing "ehird" with "BobTHJ" in paragraph 12.
--Wooble
I *would* like to keep Coinkeepor, you know. Even though it's not my
choice.
--
ehird
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:28 PM, warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I issue a challenge of identity pertaining to Elliott Hird. I issue a
>> challenge of identity pertaining to penguinofthegods. I issue a
>> challenge o
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 06:36, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BobTHJ wrote:
>
>> In addition to the above, I would gladly track (officially or
>> unofficially) the gamestate of the Air Force One contract (since it
>> interacts with Vote Market and the RBOA) but I need Murphy to publish
>> a
> Kelly17 Nov 95 29 Jul 96
> else...if [EMAIL PROTECTED] (aka Henry)30 Jul 96 21 Aug 96
> Kelly Oct 967 Nov 96
. . .
> k Ivan Hope CXXVII [EMAIL PROTECTED] 30 Jan 08 14 Jul 08
> a Offhande
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 29 Oct 2008, at 12:44, Ed Murphy wrote:
>
>> I don't want to dump that into R2193 itself. Re-propose adding the
>> relevant bit somewhere in R2105 and I'll support.
>
> Um, it's my Monster proposal. I'm Mad Scientist now
On 1 Nov 2008, at 16:55, Ian Kelly wrote:
Actually it's not, since you forgot to make it disinterested.
Goshdarnit.
--
ehird
Elysion wrote:
> On Sat, 01 Nov 2008 05:36:44 -0700
> Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> - time of last report -
>> Tue 7 Oct 15:25:58 comex : comex > ais523(lulz)
>> Wed 8 Oct 13:05:03 Wooble: comex > Murphy(CFJ 2167)
>> Mon 13 Oct 23:29:11 Pavitra :
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Voting results for Proposals 5807 - 5821:
>
> [This notice resolves the Agoran decisions of whether to adopt the
> following proposals. For each decision, the options available to
> Agora are ADOPTED (*), REJECTED (x), and FA
On 1 Nov 2008, at 22:37, Ed Murphy wrote:
TTbtAFO:
Surely too ambiguous to be effective.
--
ehird
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Surely too ambiguous to be effective.
Seems obvious to me.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On 1 Nov 2008, at 23:46, comex wrote:
(I transfer one prop from ehird to ais523 because that Cookie Monster
wasn't eir own drawing.)
No duh?
--
ehird
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Nov 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Proposal 5817 (Democratic, AI=2.0, Interest=1) by Murphy
>> Private pledges are pointless
>>
>> Amend Rule 2191 (Pledges) by replacing "A pledge is a contract"
>> with "A pledge is a pub
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 11:14 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I call for judgement on the following statement:
> All non-public pledges that existed at the time of passage
> of Proposal 5817 are null and void (i.e. no longer exist).
Note that, contrary to the title of Proposal 5817
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 10:11 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 11:14 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I call for judgement on the following statement:
>> All non-public pledges that existed at the time of passage
>> of Proposal 5817 are null and void (i.
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 10:11 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 11:14 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I call for judgement on the following statement:
>>> All non-public pledges that existed at the time of passage
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:02 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Nov 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 10:11 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Note that, contrary to the title of Proposal 5817, private pledges are
>>> not pointless, because many pledges consi
22 matches
Mail list logo
